State of Wyoming, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al. |
This matter comes before the Court on the Petitions for Review of Final Agency Action filed separately in each of these consolidated actions, challenging the Bureau of Land Management's issuance of regulations applying to hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian lands. The Court, having considered the briefs and materials submitted in support of the petitions and the oppositions thereto, includi... More... $0 (06-23-2016 - WY) |
JERRY JAMGOTCHIAN V. KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION, ET AL |
On May 21, 2011, Appellant Jerry Jamgotchian claimed Rochitta, a bay |
Georgia Pacific Corporation v. Cook Timber Company, Inc. |
Cook Timber, a logging company based in Bay Springs, Mississippi, has been in |
American Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Local Union No. 7 |
As we explained in ASE I, the structural steel industry |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAWN HUGHES |
On December 20, 2011 the district court sentenced Hughes to 30 days in prison and 24 months of supervised release. More importantly, the courts sentencing judgment made Hughes and her co-defendant Douglas Brown, the owner of DB Training, jointly and severally liable for $442,330 in restitution. But, critically, the district court also expressed a clear intention that the actual restitution amou... More... $0 (02-23-2016 - DC) |
Columbian Financial Corp. v. Stork |
Amidst the 20072008 financial crisis, the Office of the State Bank |
Twin Creeks Golf Group, L.P. v. Sunset Ridge Owners Association, Inc. |
In the underlying proceeding, Sunset Ridge sued two other entities, Twin Creeks |
Lanam v. Promise Regional Med. Ctr.-Hutchinson, Inc. |
Jaclan Lanam had her right knee replaced at Promise Regional Medical CenterHutchinson, Inc., in October 2009. She was discharged from the hospital 3 days later. Kelly Zoglman, a certified nurse assistant, transferred Lanam from her hospital chair to a wheelchair. Zoglman then rolled Lanam out to the car waiting to take her home. Zoglman was the sole assistant assigned to transfer Lanam from her wh... More... $0 (01-23-2016 - KS) |
United States of America v. Elaine Martin |
Boise, ID - Treasure Valley Contractor Pleads Guilty and is Resentenced |
Castaneda v. Souza |
Congress has long given the Attorney General discretion to decide whether to take aliens who are subject to |
Leica Microsystems Inc v. Hernandez et al |
In this removed action, plaintiff-counterdefendants motion to remand presents the |
Hanover 3201 Realty LLC v. Village Supermarkets |
Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC (Hanover Realty) signed a contract with Wegmans to develop a supermarket on its property in Hanover, New Jersey. The agreement required Hanover Realty to secure all necessary governmental permits and approvals prior to breaking ground. Village Supermarkets, Inc. (ShopRite) owns the local ShopRite. Once ShopRite and its subsidiary Hanover and Horsehill Development L... More... $0 (11-13-2015 - NJ) |
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. |
This copyright dispute tests the boundaries of fair use. Plaintiffs, who are authors of |
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. |
This copyright dispute tests the boundaries of fair use. Plaintiffs, who are authors of 27 |
Bikram's Yoga College of India, LP v. Evolation Yoga, LLC |
Court decides whether a sequence of twenty-six yoga poses and two breathing exercises developed by Bikram Choudhury and described in his 1979 book, Bikrams Beginning Yoga Class, is entitled to copyright protection. |
SD3, LLC; Sawstop, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc. |
SD3, LLC and its subsidiary, SawStop, LLC (together, SawStop), contend that several major table-saw manufacturers conspired to boycott SawStops safety technology and corrupt a private safety-standard-setting process, all with the aim of keeping that technology off the market. Consequently, SawStop sued nearly two dozen saw manufacturers and affiliated entities, alleging that they violated 1 o... More... $0 (09-15-2015 - VA) |
Common Cause Indiana v. Individual Members of the Indiana Election Commission |
Indiana Code 33-33-49-13 (the Statute or the Partisan Balance Statute) establishes the system for the election of judges to the Marion Superior Court in Marion County, Indiana. This system is unique in Indiana, as it is the only office where primary election voters do not vote for as many candidates as there are persons to be elected to that office in the general election. See Ind. Code 3-... More... $0 (09-13-2015 - IN) |
United States of America v. Gregory Bernard Griffin, Jr., a/k/a Johnny Jenkins |
Gregory Bernard Griffin was convicted of bank fraud, wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, money laundering, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. The indictment charged that he defrauded two federally insured banks. One of those banks, Bank of America Corporation,1 was indisputably not involved in his scheme, and at trial the government showed only that the other bank, Magnolia Federal Cred... More... $0 (09-01-2015 - MS) |
Pegastaff v. PG&E |
The PUC is an agency created by the California Constitution to regulate privately owned public utilities such as PG&E. (Cal. Const., art. XII.) |
Insulate SB, Inc. v. Advanced Finishing Systems |
Insulate SB, Inc., a purchaser of fast-set spray foam equipment (FSE), filed this |
DUTY FREE AMERICAS, INC. vs. THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES, INC. |
The essential facts contained in DFAs complaint and its attached exhibits |
Mark Robbins v. Randy Becker, Sr. |
St. Louis, MO - Eighth Circuit affirms District Court summary judgment in favor of Missouri Highway Patrol |
Sensational Smiles LLC DBA Smile Bright v. Dr. Jewel Mullen et al. |
2 The question in this case is whether a Connecticut rule restricting the |
United States of America v. Apple, Inc. |
14 Since the invention of the printing press, the distribution of books has |
Stephen Kimbel v. Marvel Entertainment, L.L.C. |
In Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U. S. 29 (1964), this Court held that a patent holder cannot charge royalties for the use of his invention after its patent term has expired. The sole question presented here is whether we should overrule Brulotte. Adhering to principles of stare decisis, we decline to do so. Critics of the Brulotte rule must seek relief not from this Court but from Congress. |
Next Page |