Motion To Suppress Law
 
United States of America v. Michael Hinds

Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possessing cocaine base with intent to distribute, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and being a felon in possession of a firearm, see id. § 922(g)(1). Hinds moved to suppress the evidence from the car, arguing that the officers lac

More...   $0 (08-15-2025 - MI)

United States of America v. James Eric Larremore

Alpine, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant who was charged with conspiracy to transport illegal aliens in violation of 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) & (B)(i).

On July 9, 2023, at approximately 1:45 p.m., Brewster County Deputy
Christopher Colona was parked on a remote section of U.S. Highway 385
monitoring traffic near a border patrol checkpoint at the time of a r

More...   $0 (08-14-2025 - TX)

United States of America v. David Craig Milam

Wilmington, North Carolina, criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

David Milam, the leader of the Aryan Kings, a White supremacist group, pleaded guilty on August 13, 2019, to possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Then, on January 15, 2020, he pleaded g

More...   $0 (08-13-2025 - NC)

United States of America v. Jeremy Dustin Parke

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with
three counts for sexual abuse of a minor.

Each count was punishable by a different sentence: Count One carried a maximum sentence of fifteen years, Count Two carried a maximum of two years, and Count Three carried a minimum of fifteen years and a
maximum of life imprisonment.

On June 17, 20

More...   $0 (08-12-2025 - OK)

United States of America v. Antonio Ramirez-Lopez

Kansas City, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with reetry of a previously removed alien convicted of an aggravated felony.

The government charged Antonio Ramirez-Lopez with reentry of a previously removed alien convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2), and moved for him to be detained pretrial based on flight risk

More...   $0 (08-12-2025 - KS)

United States of America v. Muhammad Babar Chaudhry

St. Louis, Missouri criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with four counts of wire fraud. Stealing Millions of Dollars from Missouri Grocery Chain

Ohio Man Accused of Stealing Millions of Dollars from Missouri Grocery Chain


More...   $0 (08-11-2025 - MO)

United States of America v. Dinelson Hernandez-Rodrigues

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with

Dinelson Hernandez-Rodriguez was
traveling southbound on Interstate 95 when the vehicle he was
driving was stopped by a Connecticut state trooper. Unbeknownst
to Hernandez-Rodriguez, that vehicle was being tracked by the Drug
Enforcement Administration ("DEA") as part of a months-long

More...   $0 (08-11-2025 - MA)

United States of America v. Muhammad Babar Chaudhry

St. Louis, Missouri criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Stealing Millions of Dollars from Missouri Grocery Chain

Ohio Man Accused of Stealing Millions of Dollars from Missouri Grocery Chain


More...   $0 (08-11-2025 - MO)

State of Florida v. Erika Bernadette Higgins

Orlando, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant who filed a motion of dismiss.

he trial court determined that Higgins had complied with all terms of a pretrial diversion (PTD) contract and was thus entitled to dismissal of her charges. The State argues that the trial court did not have authority to dismiss the charges because the decision to continue prosecution under s

More...   $0 (08-08-2025 - FL)

United States of America v. David Petersen

Mobile, Alabama pro se Defendant representing himself without a lawyer sought a writ of error coram nobis.

A writ of error coram nobis is a legal order that allows a court to correct its own judgment when a fundamental error of fact existed at the time of the original trial, but was not discovered or presented during the proceedings. This writ is typically used as a last resort when other

More...   $0 (08-08-2025 - AL)

United States of America v. Lawrence Lombardi

Tallahassee, Florida criminal represented himself without a lawyer seeking a reduction in sentencing pursuant for 8 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

In 2000, a jury found Mr. Lombardi guilty of federal charges
related to his planting of pipe bombs that exploded on the campus
of the Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University—a histori-
cally black university—in Tallahassee, Florid

More...   $0 (08-08-2025 - FL)

United States of America v. Raul Guzman

Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

In September 2022, Albuquerque Police Officers Walker Marion and
Alex Castellano accompanied Christopher Armenta, a city code enforcement
supervisor, to inspect Mr. Cannon’s property for compliance with Albuquerque’s
housing code. Upon entering the proper

More...   $0 (08-08-2025 - NM)

Kylea Wagner v. Rigo Tovar

Rapid City, South Dakota family law lawyers represented the parties in a protective order matter.

Kylea Wagner filed a petition for a protection order against Rigo Tovar for herself and their two minor children. Following a permanent order hearing, the circuit court found that domestic abuse occurred and issued a five-year domestic permanent protection order that required Rigo not to hav

More...   $0 (08-08-2025 - SD)

Robert Platt v. Sodexo, SA and Sodexo, Inc.

Santa Ana, California employment law lawyer represented the kPlaintiff under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B)
and § 502(a)(3), and a breach of fiduciary duty claim on behalf of the employer-sponsored health insurance plan
(“the Plan”) for losses under ERISA § 502(a)(2).

Robert Platt sued his employer, Sodexo, Inc. and Sodexo, S.A. (collectively, “Sodexo”), claiming that a monthly

More...   $0 (08-07-2025 - CA)

Tami Corrello v. Douglas Corrello

Trenton, New Jersey family law lawyers represented the parties in an alimony payment dispute.

In this matrimonial matter, the parties are before this court again post-judgment regarding the obligation of defendant Douglas Corrello to pay plaintiff Tami Corrello alimony. In this appeal, defendant challenges a March 15, 2024 order, in which a Family Part judge denied defendant's motion to t

More...   $0 (08-06-2025 - NY)

Caroline S. Robboy and Peter A. Gearhart v. Two Independence Place Condominium Owners' Association

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania real property condo law lawyers represented the parties.

Plaintiffs Caroline S. Robboy and Peter A. Gearheart ("Gearharts") own a commercial condominium unit they are attempting to sell and seek summary judgment on their claims that Defendant Two Independence Place Condominium Owner's Association ("Two Independence Place") has unlawfully infringed their property

More...   $0 (08-07-2025 - PA)

James F. Trambly v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska

Lincoln, Nebraska employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights job discrimination theory.

Trambly was hired by the University of Nebraska-Kearney in November 2013 to work as a help desk associate in the Information Technology department.Trambly’s duties included responding to requests for assistance, supporting assigned academic departments, and managing st

More...   $0 (08-06-2025 - NE)

United States of America v. Devante Glenn

Cleveland, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with selling
drugs that led to an overdose death, appeals his conviction on two counts of distributing
carfentanil, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), and one count of using a
telecommunications device to facilitate the transaction, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b).

On July 19, 201

More...   $0 (08-05-2025 - OH)

United States of America v. Fernando Lee Jordan, a/k/a Fernand Lee Jordan, a/k/a Fernando Lee Jordan

Richmond, Virginia pro se Defendant sought a reduction of sentence.

Fernardo Lee Jordan appealed the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. “We review a district court’s decision [whether] to reduce a sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion and its ruling as to the scope of its legal authority unde

More...   $0 (08-01-2025 - VA)

United States of America v. Les Christopher Burns

Lynchburg, Virginia, pro se Defendant sought to fire his appointed counsel.

Les Christopher Burns sought to appeal the district court’s order denying his counsel’s motion to withdraw and appoint new counsel in Burns’s ongoing criminal proceedings. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C

More...   $0 (08-01-2025 - VA)

Laura and James Sampson, et al. v. Subaru of America, Inc., et al.

Newark, New Jersey consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act violation consumer class action.

Plaintiffs Laura and James Sampson, Anthony Ventura and Joanne
Fulgieri Ventura, Elizabeth Wheatley, and Shirley Reinhard, on her own behalf and
on behalf of the Estate of Kenneth Reinhard, (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action for
themse

More...   $0 (08-04-2025 - )

United States of America v. Keith Rodney Moore

Richmond, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with illegal possession of a firearm.

When Richmond, Virginia, police officers observed a vehicle with the temporary license tag number 11134Y, they concluded that it was a fake tag because, within the preceding hours, they had stopped two other vehicles with the identical temporary tag number. The officers activ

More...   $0 (08-04-2025 - VA)

Darrell J. Austin, Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Richmond, Virginia consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.

Parties sometimes agree to resolve disputes between them in private arbitration instead of litigating in state or federal court. The Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to honor such an agreement when a party seeks to enforce it, so long as a binding contract to arbitrate

More...   $0 (08-04-2025 - VA)

United States of America v. Karl Sebastian Greenwood, et al.

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with engaging in a cryptocurrency scam.

Defendant Karl Greenwood pled guilty to various charges related to a cryptocurrency scam. In advance of sentencing, Greenwood submitted a partially redacted sentencing memorandum and accompanying exhibits, most of which the district court sealed entirely. Appellant Mat

More...   $0 (07-30-2025 - ny)

Erick Blecher, et al. v. The Holy See, a/k/a The Apostolic See

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on negligence theories.

The question presented in this case is whether the discretionary function exclusion from the tortious activity exception of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”) precludes federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over claims against the Holy See concerning child sexual

More...   $0 (08-01-2025 - NY)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher