Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.

Plaintiff claimed to have been injured and/or damaged in a car truck wreck that occurred on September 16, 2021, when Parese Burns negligently drove her vehicle by blocking a lane of travel on I-244, and Jerry Mayo also negligently drove his vehicle.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the on a Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on auto negligence claims.

The Plaintiffs claimed that they were injured and/or damaged in a car wreck caused by the Defendant that occurred on June 27, 2021 that occurred near 100 North Elgin.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.

The Plaintiff claimed that she and her child were injured and/or damaged in a car wreck caused by an Oklahoma City Police Officer.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.

The Plaintiff claimed that he and his were injured and/or damages in a car wreck that occurred on December 5, 2023 in Oklahoma City caused by the Defendant.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence claim.

The Plaintiff claimed that he was injured and/or damaged in a car wreck caused by the Defendant.

Norman, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence claim.

Columbia, South Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory.

A South Carolina state court judge issued a bench warrant to arrest Tim Landholt for not paying child support. Sheriff’s deputies soon arrested Landholt, who was fined and sent on his way. But the clerk’s office never recalled or cancelled the executed warra

Las Vegas, Nevada personal Injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on malicious prosecution, abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) and negligence he Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) claims.

Anchorage, Alaska personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Longshore and Harbor
Workers’ Compensation Act claim.

Elias Nystrom slipped and injured his shoulder while moving frozen cargo
aboard a vessel in Dutch Harbor, Alaska. He brought this maritime negligence
action against the vessel’s owners (Defendants) under the Longshore and Harbor
Worker

San Angelo, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

In Texas, premises liability law holds property owners responsible for injuries that occur on their property due to unsafe conditions. To prove a claim, an injured person must generally demonstrate that the owner was negligent by breaching a legal duty of care. The specific duty of

Shreveport, Louisiana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

auto negligence laws
. This bill, which went into effect on August 1, 2025, replaces the state's "pure comparative negligence" system with a "modified comparative fault" standard.
New modified comparative fault law (effective August 1, 2025)

Modified compara

New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence theory.

New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Louisiana's auto negligence law is primarily defined by its pure comparative fault system, where a plaintiff's compensation is reduced by their percentage of fault, even if they are mostly at fault. To prove negligence, a plaintiff must establish the four elements of duty, breach,

New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sue on a truck wreck negligence theory.

Louisiana auto negligence law centers on
pure comparative fault, meaning you can recover damages even if you are at fault, but your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault. To win a negligence claim, you must prove the four elements of negligence: duty, breach, c

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

The Plaintiffs claimed that they were injured and/or damaged as a direct result of a car wreck that occurred near East 81st Street and South Memorial Drive and a direct result of the negligence on the Defendant.

Atlanta, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence claims.

Mobile, Alabama pro se Plaintiffs attempted to represent themselves with a lawyer in an employment discrimination case.

Ms. Brown is a former Walmart employee. Her twin
brother, Mr. Brown, has power of attorney over her estate. To-
gether, the Browns brought twelve claims against two Walmart
executives, CEO Carl McMillon and CFO John Rainey, for alleged
offenses that occur

Miami, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a slip and fall claim.

On May 26, 2022, while walking toward the entrance of a dining
area on Carnival’s Horizon cruise ship, Scott encountered a Carni-
val employee who advised Scott to take an alternate route due to a
large amount of water on the pool deck. Upon entering the area
into which he was

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence theory.

Greenville, South Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the plaintiff on an auto negligence claim.

Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Manslaughter
Marathon Man Charged with Seaman’s Marathon Man Charged with Seaman’s Manslaughter

Claremore, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence claim.

The Plaintiff claimed that she was injured and/or damaged in a car wreck in Rogers County caused Joshua Ryand and Andpro Plumbing and Drain, Inc. on October 7, 2022.

Anchorage, Alaska insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was initially filed in the State of Alaska, Third Judicial District, 3AN-25-04081, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In Alaska, insurance bad faith occurs when an insurer unreasonably denies or delays payment of a valid claim

Richland, Washington personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a product liability theory.

* * *

Washington product liability law, governed by the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA), addresses injuries caused by defective products. It establishes that manufacturers and sellers can be held liable for harm if a product is not "reasonably safe" due to design flaws, m