¶1 Appellant Scott James Eizember was tried by jury and convicted of Second Degree Felony Murder (Count I) (21 O.S. 2001, § 701.8(2)); First Degree Malice Murder (Count II) (21 O.S. 2001, § 701.7(A)); Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (Count III) (21 O.S. 2001, § 645); Shooting with Intent to Kill (Count IV) (21 O.S. 2001, § 652); First Degree Burglary (Count V) (21 O.S. 2001, §

Appellant Aaron Ross (“Appellant”) brought this action challenging his March 12, 2008 and March 25, 2009 arrests for refusing to obey Baltimore City Police Officer Wayne Early’s (“Officer Early”) repeated orders to confine his leafleting to the area designated for protest activities outside the First Mariner Arena (the “Arena”) in Baltimore, Maryland. The designated protest area was

[¶1] Monica Clark, as the personal representative of the estate of Lester Jasmanka, appeals from a district court order denying her motion to vacate a 1990 default judgment quieting title to certain mineral interests in Jack and Eugene Peterson. We affirm, concluding (1) the 1990 judgment was not void and therefore could not be vacated under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4), and (2) the motion to vacate the

Appeal from judgments of the United States District Court for the
Western District of New York (Richard J. Arcara, Judge), after a jury trial, based
on, inter alia, the instruction to the jury not to give weight to administrative
findings, the juryʹs finding of liability on the plaintiffʹs state law discrimination
claims, the juryʹs finding of liability on the plaintiffʹs const

James Christian Warner (“Warner”) appeals from his conviction after a jury trial of attempted inmate fraud1 as a Class C felony, contending that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Warner wrote a letter to Ruby Dilk (“Ruby”) and a letter to Priscilla Young (“Priscilla”) from the Bartholomew County Jail w

In this dispute over life-insurance proceeds, the deceased insured’s former wife appeals the trial court’s ruling that she is not entitled to the interpleaded funds. Her adult son and daughter also have attempted to appeal the judgment.

2

We dismiss the daughter’s appeal for want of prosecution and dismiss the son’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment as i

Michael Shovah filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont against the Diocese and its former priest, Gary Mercure, alleging that Mercure transported Shovah (when he was a minor sometime in the late 1980s2) from New York to Vermont for the purpose of sexually abusing him, and did sexually abuse him. Shovah asserted only general (not specific) jurisdiction over the Di

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation ("Citizens") seeks certiorari review of the trial court's order denying it a stay pending neutral evaluation of the sinkhole claim that forms the basis for the underlying lawsuit. Citizens argues that the statute governing neutral evaluation mandates a stay of court proceedings and that the statutory right to neutral evaluation cannot be waived by participat

The Supreme Court has held that state and local governments may regulate adult estab-­‐‑ lishments by using time, place, and manner restrictions to reduce the secondary effects of those businesses on third parties, but may not regulate them to restrict the dissemina-­‐‑ tion of speech disapproved by local residents. Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002); Renton v. Playt

[¶1] Jeffrey and Jeanne Stoops appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Hunter J.), granting Richard and Betty Nelson’s1 motion for summary judgment declaring that the Nelsons properly acquired title through a municipal quitclaim deed to property located in Madawaska that the Stoopses once owned. The Stoopses argue that the court erred in granting the Nelsons’ m

Jeff Greene appeals a final judgment and order dismissing his complaint against Times Publishing Company, Miami Herald Media Company, and three reporters for libel. Concluding that the complaint states a legally sufficient cause of action against each defendant, we reverse and remand the case to the circuit court for further proceedings.

I. Parties

Greene was a candidate for nominati

Terry Bollea sought to enjoin Gawker Media, LLC, from publishing and otherwise distributing the written report about his extramarital affair that includes video excerpts from the sexual encounter. The circuit court granted Mr. Bollea's motion for temporary injunction, though it did not articulate the reasons for doing so. On appeal, Gawker Media challenges the circuit court's order, asserting that

Kamela Jackson sued Adnan Sheik on an auto negligence theory claiming:

1. That the Plaintiff is a resident of Rogers County, Oklahoma.

2. That the Defendant is a resident of Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

3. That the actions and events that give rise to this suit all arise in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma on the 101h day of February, 2009.

5. That this Court has juri

Appellants, Roger and Judy Hoschar (collectively “Appellants”), filed this civil action in the Circuit Court of Mason County, West Virginia, against Appellee, Appalachian Power Company (“APCO”), and Defendant, Industrial Contractors, Inc. (“ICI”), seeking damages for an infectious lung disease called histoplasmosis that Roger Hoschar (“Mr. Hoschar”) allegedly contracted while worki

Plaintiff Scott Matusick, who is white, was employed by the Erie
County Water Authority (ʺECWAʺ) during 2004 when, he claims, he was
assaulted, harassed, and ultimately terminated from his employment because of
a romantic relationship he had with an African‐American woman, Anita Starks ‐‐
now Anita Starks‐Matusick. Starks and Matusick met in 2003 but, according to
her

¶ 1 The Federal District Court for the District of Utah has certified the following question to this court: Does section 78B-3-425 of the Utah Code clarify existing law and therefore retroactively apply to bar negligent credentialing claims that arose prior to its enactment?

WADDOUPS v. NOORDA

Opinion of the Court

2

Utah Code section 78B-3-425 reads: Prohibition on cau

Plaintiff and appellant Ricky D. Ross is a former criminal who achieved some sort of celebrity status due, in part, to the enormous scale of his cocaine-dealing operations. Defendant and respondent William Leonard Roberts II is a famous rap musician who goes by the name “Rick Ross.” His lyrics frequently include fictional accounts of selling cocaine. Plaintiff sued Roberts and other defendants

This case concerns the law of asset forfeiture and, more particularly, the procedures regarding forfeiture of property connected with unlawful drug activity, as governed by sections 11470 through 11489 of the Health and Safety Code. The questions presented are (1) may a policing agency rather than a prosecuting agency initiate these forfeiture proceedings; and (2) is substantial compliance or some

April Layton, Melanie Hunfnagal and Valerie Winfrey sued Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc., Doyle W. Argo, John Whetsel, Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners on civil rights wrongful death theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming that Charles Holdstock died while in custody because the defendants failed and refused to provide batteries for his pacemaker.

The Defens

This appeal relates to the service of four members of the Board of Directors for the Southern Valley County Recreation District (the Recreation District). The Valley County Prosecuting Attorney (the State) brought usurpation actions against Donald Keithly, Yvette Davis, Patrick Cowles, and Michael Smith (the Directors), alleging they usurped their offices as directors of the Recreation District. T

This appeal arises from a $1.1 million jury award in favor of a terminated employee on a claim of retaliation for the exercise of his First Amendment rights.

A veteran deputy sheriff used pepper spray and physical force to subdue a motorcyclist fleeing from a fellow law enforcement officer. The deputy duly prepared his report of the incident and submitted the report to his superiors, who in

In 2012, Bryan Craig selfpublished a short book of adult relationship advice entitled “It’s Her Fault.” And when we say “adult,” we mean it in every sense of the word—in his book, Craig repeatedly discusses sexually provocative themes and uses sexually explicit terminology. Eventually, Craig’s employer, a school district located in Chicago’s south suburbs, learned of the publica2

We learn from this Title VII appeal that Tonia Royal worked at an apartment complex for only four days before she was fired by defendant CCC&R. During this brief time, she was regularly visited in her small office by two maintenance men who hovered over her and sniffed her in a sexually suggestive manner. When she complained to her superiors about this behavior, she was then fired for unspecific r

In August 2012, the Postal Regulatory Commission issued an order approving a negotiated service agreement for the sale of postage between the United States Postal Service and Valassis Direct Mail, Inc., a national marketing company. Under the agreement, Valassis receives discounted postage for some of its advertisement mailers once its mail volume hits a predetermined threshold. Petitioner Newspap

An attorney's website advertised her success in two cases raising issues similar to those she was about to try here. The trial court admonished the jury not to "Google" the attorneys or to read any articles about the case or anyone involved in it. Concerned that a juror might ignore these admonitions, the court ordered the attorney to remove for duration of trial two pages from her website discus