Charleston, South Carolina, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a prisoner civil rights violation theory.

Tucson, Arizona criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of Conspiracy to Transport Illegal Aliens for Profit.
Human Smuggling Coordinator Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy after Illegal Alien Dies

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff as personal representative of the Estate of Israel Williams, who sued on a prisoner civil rights violation theory.

Tucson, Arizona criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of Conspiracy to Transport Illegal Aliens for Profit.
Human Smuggling Coordinator Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy after Illegal Alien Dies

Miami, Florida employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

Sharon Gallimore sued the City of Opa Locka (“the City”) on an employment discrimination theory brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (the “ADEA”), 29 U.S.

Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

In September 2022, Albuquerque Police Officers Walker Marion and
Alex Castellano accompanied Christopher Armenta, a city code enforcement
supervisor, to inspect Mr. Cannon’s property for compliance with Albuquerque’s
housing code. Upon entering the proper

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented the PlaintiffS who sued on intentional infliction of emotional distress theories.

Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants were liable under this state law claim because their actions “in making or contributing to the making of false reports of abuse to DCS were extreme and outrageous.” However, Arizona’s mandatory reporting statute req

Seattle, Washington consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a Washington Consumer Protection Act Violation theory.

The Olsons have resided in their home in Kent, Washington, since their
marriage in 1990. In early 2019, at a time when they were experiencing financial
difficulties, the Olsons received a flyer in the mail from Unison that offered a way
to o

Seattle, Washington civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

World Vision extended a job offer to McMahon for a remote position as a customer service representative
(CSR). After learning that McMahon was in a same-sex marriage, World Vision revoked its job offer

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania real property condo law lawyers represented the parties.

Plaintiffs Caroline S. Robboy and Peter A. Gearheart ("Gearharts") own a commercial condominium unit they are attempting to sell and seek summary judgment on their claims that Defendant Two Independence Place Condominium Owner's Association ("Two Independence Place") has unlawfully infringed their property

Lincoln, Nebraska employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights job discrimination theory.

Trambly was hired by the University of Nebraska-Kearney in November 2013 to work as a help desk associate in the Information Technology department.Trambly’s duties included responding to requests for assistance, supporting assigned academic departments, and managing st

St. Louis, Missouri employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights violation theory.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Patricia Conway, a registered nurse, was terminated from Mercy Hospital St. Louis (“Mercy Hospital”)—a non-profit healthcare facility owned and operated by Mercy Health Ministries—after she refused to comply with the hospital’s vaccination policy.

Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraud.

Yogesh Pancholi defrauded Medicare of millions of dollars, pocketed the money, and transferred it offshore to India, where it remains unrecovered. He was tried and convicted of health care fraud, witness tampering, money laundering, and aggravated identity theft. He appeals, arguing that his Fifth and

Detroit, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violation theories.

After prosecutors agreed to have his murder conviction thrown
out, Larry Smith sued Wayne County and Robert Donaldson. Smith claims that his conviction
resulted from an elaborate scheme designed by police and prosecutors to elicit false testimony
from jailhouse infor

Bay City, Michigan employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an age discrimination theory.

In June 2018, Kenneth Lowe was fired from his job at Walbro LLC. Lowe was 60 years old at the time and had worked at Walbro for more than four decades. He responded by filing this diversity-of-citizenship lawsuit against Walbro, alleging that the company had violated Michigan’s E

Grand Rapids, Michigan civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff t challenging a Michigan law that bans the use of drones to hunt or collect downed game.

After a hunter shoots a game animal, such as a deer, the animal often runs away and dies
in another location. Tracking dogs and trail cameras are two ways of finding the animal. DDR
offers a third option—one that it says i

Austin, Texas pro se Plaintiff sued asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the
Americans with Disabilities Act, and Texas state law, and its imposition of a
pre-filing injunction.

San Antonio, Texas pro se Plaintiff sued on a job discrimination theory.

42 U.S. Code § 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations.

Here's a breakdown of key aspects:

Houston, Employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a pregnancy discrimination civil rights violation theory.

Richmond began working for TeamOne in 2019 as an Operations Manager at the company’s Freeport, Texas location. TeamOne had a contract with UPS Logistics and was responsible for hiring and managing truck drivers for a UPS client’s Freeport facility. For her par

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the plaintiff who sued on a prisoner civil rights violation theory.

From August 10, 2015, to July 8, 2021, Mark Hernandez was incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) prison system. In 2018, Hernandez filed a pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit against three TDCJ corrections officers, Brady (Cullen) Preischel, Manuel P

Richmond, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with illegal possession of a firearm.

When Richmond, Virginia, police officers observed a vehicle with the temporary license tag number 11134Y, they concluded that it was a fake tag because, within the preceding hours, they had stopped two other vehicles with the identical temporary tag number. The officers activ

Wheeling, West Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights claim

New York, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a due process violation theory.

This is a case about process. When the Constitution requires process, it is a “bedrock” principle that the process due must be afforded “at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.” Taylor v. Rodriguez, 238 F.3d 188, 193 (2d Cir. 2001) (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge, 42

Albany, New York employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued an a wrongful termination civil rights violation theory.

Plaintiff Samantha Long, who previously served as the Clerk of the Town Justice Court for the Town of New Lebanon, sues defendants the Town of New Lebanon and Jessica Byrne, a former Town Justice, alleging that they unlawfully fired her because she cooperated

New York, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a First Amendment violation theory.

The Hateful Conduct Law, broadly speaking, requires social media
networks to (1) provide a “clear and easily accessible mechanism for
individual users to report incidents of hateful conduct,” id. § 394-ccc(2), and
(2) have a “clear and concise policy readil