Parental Rights Law
 
Mamdou Bah, et al. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Boston, LLC, et al.

Boston, Massachusetts labor law lawyers represented a class of plaintiff suing on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.

Mamadou Bah's complaint alleged that, in violation of the FLSA, Enterprise Boston and EHI failed to pay overtime wages prior to November 27, 2016, to assistant branch managers whom, like himself, the two companies jointly employed. As support for the FLSA claims,

More...   $0 (06-20-2025 - MA)

Mysha Jacara Reynold v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al.

Tampa, Florida consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Credit Reporting Act Violation theory.

* * *

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) is a US federal law designed to promote the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. It regulates how consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) collect, use, and share consu

More...   $1 (06-20-2025 - FL)

Gabrielle Fuentes v. TrueAccord Corp.

Tampa, Florida consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County Court, 2025 SC 003458, which was removed to federal county by the Defendant.

* * *

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that aims to eliminate abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt colle

More...   $1 (06-20-2025 - FL)

Nikki McKay v. Halsted Financial Services, LLC

Fort Myers, Florida consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory.

* * *

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that aims to eliminate abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by third-party debt collectors
. It protects consumers from being harassed or threatened by debt collectors.

More...   $0 (06-20-2025 - FL)

Jesse Andrade, et al. v. Kevin Rambosk, et al.

Fort Myer, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a civil rights wrongful death theory.

Twenty-one seconds after arriving at the scene and without warning, Deputy Jean shot at Morales four times from five feet away. Morales was also attacked by a K-9. Morales died from his injuries.

More...   $0 (06-20-2025 - FL)

Samuel Scott, Jr. v. City of Miami, et al.

Miami, Florida civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming ultiple claims against Officers Guzman,
Bloom, Hernandez, and Carriel in their individual capacities and against the City of Miami.1 Scott sued under the Fourth amendment for unreasonable seizure against all of the officers and unreasonable search against Officer Hernandez pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with filing sta

More...   $0 (06-29-2025 - FL)

Prashant Jain v. Paul Andus, et al.

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights violation theory.

More...   $1 (06-18-2025 - NM)

Jamall S. Baker v. Tammy O'Reilly

Seattle, Washington civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights violation claim.

* * *

Prisoner civil rights laws protect inmates from violations of their constitutional rights while incarcerated. These laws safeguard against cruel and unusual punishment, discrimination, and denial of due process. Key areas of protection include freedom from excessiv

More...   $0 (06-18-2025 - wa)

Stephen D. Woodbridge v. The City of Greenfield

Springfield, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Civil Rights Act violation theory.

* * *

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark US law that prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It addresses discrimination in various areas including voting, public accommodations, public education, and employment. Th

More...   $1 (06-18-2025 - MA)

Heather Hutchison v. Ranch and Home Supply, LLC, d/b/a Murdock's Ranch & Home Supply

Denver, Colorado civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintff on a job discrimination claimed under 42:2000(e)(2)-(o)(t)

* * *
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, which is part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits unlawful employment practices based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This includes discrimination by employers, employment agencies, and labor organ

More...   $1 (06-17-2025 - CO)

Lora Premo v. Starbucks Corporation

Denver, Colorado civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Discrimination) theory.

The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a broad civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability in several areas, including employment, public services, public accommodations, and telecommunications. It ensures equal opportuniti

More...   $1 (06-16-2025 - CO)

Jayce Dorsett v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company

Denver, Colorado insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

In Colorado, an insured party can sue an insurance company for bad faith breach of an insurance contract, which occurs when an insurer unreasonably delays or denies a valid claim. This can involve both statutory and common law claims, potentially leading to the recovery of m

More...   $1 (06-16-2025 - CO)

James Mitchell Gunn v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.

Chattanooga, Tennessee insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff in a bad faith breach of insurance contract case.

Plaintiff was hired by SIAG Aerisyin ("SIAG Aerisyn"), LLC, a producer of steel towers located in Chattanooga, Tennessee, on March 28, 2011 (Admin. R. at 115). SIAG Aerisyin provided Plaintiff healthcare insurance under a Group Policy ("the Plan"), which Defendant admini

More...   $0 (05-15-2025 - TN)

Garvin L. Thomas, et al. v. Richard Montgomery, et al.

Nashville, Tennessee civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming due process violations.

In their class-action complaint against the members of Tennessee’s Board of Parole, plaintiffs allege that Tennessee’s use of a computer test to determine parole eligibility violated their constitutional right to due process. The district court found that plaintiffs failed to state a pl

More...   $0 (06-16-2025 - TN)

Keenan H. Meadors v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the parties in a Job Discrimination (Employment) 42 U.A.X. 2000e casa.

42 U.S.C. 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations. This law makes it illegal to dis

More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - OK)

Prielinso Conner v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

San Antonio, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a Job Discrimination (Employment) claim

Federal employment law prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, and genetic information. This protection extends to various aspects of employment, in

More...   $1 (06-13-2025 - TX)

Sadie Foster v. BNSF Railway Company

Austin, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an Americans with Disabilities Act theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a US civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability. It ensures equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities in various aspects of public life, including employment, state and local government services, public

More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - TX)

Travis Alan Barris, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank

Austin, Texas consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a foreclosure law theory.

This case was filed in the 53rd Judicial District Court, Travis County, TX, D-1-GN-25-002132, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In Texas, foreclosure on a property typically occurs when a borrower defaults on their loan, either through non-payment or other breaches of the

More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - TX)

Foster A. Parnell v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

Austin, Texas consumer law lawyers presented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) is a federal law designed to promote the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of consumer information contained in the files of consumer reporting agencies (CRAs). It regulates how CRAs collect, use, and disclose consumer information, partic

More...   $1 (06-13-2025 - TX)

Jesus Yanez v. Dish Network, LLC, etc.

El Paso, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory.

In 2001, EchoStar Communications Corporation (“EchoStar”) hired
Appellant Jesus Yanez as a customer service representative at its El Paso,
Texas location. As part of his day one onboarding, Yanez allegedly signed an
arbitration agreement purporting to bind Yanez,

More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - TX)

Kenneth D. Anderson, et al.v Crystal Estrada, et al.

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory.


In the early morning of October 10, 2021, Kenneth Anderson, Jr.,
crashed a sedan in Harris County, Texas. Deputy Crystal Estrada was the
first officer to arrive at the scene around 3:25 A.M. Her body camera shows
Anderson’s car against the curb near an intersect

More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - TX)

E.R. v. Beaufort County School District

Beaufordt, South Carolina civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Title IX theory alleging
that Appellee failed to appropriately respond to her reports of sexual abuse and harassment while she was a student.

Title IX prohibits sex discrimination by recipients of federal education funding. The statute provides that “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the b

More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - SC)

Min Tang v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Greenbelt, Maryland civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination retaliation theory brought pursuant to o Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17.

More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - MD)

Curtrina Martin and Toi Cliatt v. United States of America, et al.

Atlanta, Georgia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

On October 18, 2017, the FBI raided the wrong house in suburban At-
lanta. Officers meant to execute search and arrest warrants at a sus-
pected gang hideout at 3741 Landau Lane but instead stormed 3756
Denville Trace, a quiet family home occupied by peti

More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - GA)

Greta J. Hurt, et al. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers are representing the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 2000e job discrimination theories.


COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs Greta J. Hurt and Julie D. Lynn, ("Hurt" and "Lynn") allege:
1. This action is brought on behalf of the Plaintiffs to enforce the provisions of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq. ("Title VII

More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - OK)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher