Newark, New Jersey intellectual property litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff, who sued the Defendants on patent infringement theories.

... More...   $1 (09-22-2023 - NJ)

Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

DP Creations is a retain apparel and fashion company located in Bountiful, Utah.

Denise Pratt sculpted life-like newborn dolls as a hobby. Eventually her creations became so popular that Ms. Pratt and her husband, Nevin, organized DP Creations LLC (DPC)... More...   $0 (08-18-2023 - UT)

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

"Copyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material. This can include things like copying, distributing, or performing copyrighted works without permission from the copyright holder.

Copyright infringement is a violation of the copy... More...   $0 (08-08-2023 - NY)

New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

"Copyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material. This can include things like copying, distributing, or performing copyrighted works without permission from the copyright holder.

Copyright infringement is a violation of the copyright... More...   $0 (08-08-2023 - NY)

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff that sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.... More...   $0 (08-04-2023 - NY)

Muskogee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with stalking, attempted first degree burglary in Indian Country, attempted sexual abuse, first degree burglary and coercion and enticement.


18 U.S.C. 1151 provides:

Except as otherwise provided in sections 1154 and 1156 of this title, the term “Indian country”, as used in this chapter, means (a) al... More...   $0 (08-03-2023 - OK)

Allentown, Pennsylvania intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories.


Plaintiffs Dawn Cutillo and Infinity Health, LLC (“IH”) have alleged federal and state law claims against Defendants David Cutillo, Infinity Health Advisors LLC, (“IHA”), and intervenor IHA Distribution, LLC (“IHAD”). Plaintiffs' claims aris... More...   $0 (07-28-2023 - PA)

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory in violation of 17 U.S.C. 501, which provides:

(a) Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 122 or of the author as provided in section 106A(a), or who imports copies or phonorecords into the Unit... More...   $0 (07-21-2023 - NY)

Boston, Massachusetts intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories.

The Complaint alleges that defendants Courser Athletics, Inc., Michael Petry, Gregg Spiro and Laurie Spiro are “willfully infringing Mr. Kraljevich's copyrighted works by manufacturing, importing, distributing and selling high-priced athletic sneakers that co... More...   $0 (07-21-2023 - MA)

Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.


Plaintiff Amy Licht (“Plaintiff” or &ldquo ;Licht”) brings the instant action against Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., and Organon, LLC (collectively, “Merck” or “Defendants”) for claims arising from neuropsychiatric injuries... More...   $0 (07-13-2023 - MA)

New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant in an auto insurance liability theory.

This case was filed in the Civil District Court, Orleans Parish, 22-05143, C-10, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

Plaintiffs challenged the jurisdiction of the federal court to president over the case and sought remand.

... More...   $0 (06-05-2023 - LA)

Sherman, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory.

The case was filed in the 393rd Judicial District, Denton County, Texas and was removed to federal court by the
Defendants.

Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the court and sought remand.
"Federal courts have jurisdiction over civil cases in a variety of situation... More...   $0 (06-05-2023 - TX)

Billings, Montana real property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking to quiet title to n 86.42% interest, or 690.54 acres, in Allotment 1809 from the United States as trust holder to the Estate of Jack Halverson ("Jack's estate"), and (2) a fee patent deed conveying Jack's estate's interest in Allotment 1809 to Jack's heir.... More...   $0 (05-31-2023 - MT)

Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property law lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in patent infringement throries.


In this patent infringement case, Plaintiffs Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. (collectively, “EagleView”) filed a motion to compel Defendant Nearmap US, Inc.[1] to supplement its discovery responses in two areas.[2] First, Eag... More...   $0 (05-18-2023 - UT)

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer sued Defendants on auto negligence and medical malpractice theories.


On October 10, 2018, plaintiff was injured when a tortfeasor stuck plaintiff's vehicle from behind. Dkt. # 2-1, at 2. Plaintiff's vehicle was owned by his employer, and plaintiff was operating it within the scope of his employment at the time of the incident. Id. Pl... More...   $0 (05-16-2023 - OK)

Wilmington, Delaware patent infringement lawyer represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendants claiming that they were violating "United States Patent Nos, 8,549,410 (“the '410 patent”), 8,549,411 (“the '411 patent”), and 8,769,440 (“the '440 patent”) (collectively “the Asserted Patents”). D.1.1. All of the /Asserted Patents expired in 2018. D.I. 67 at 2.

The PT AB issued Fi... More...   $0 (05-16-2023 - DE)

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

Copyright infringement is the use of copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright owner. Copyright infringement can take many forms, including:

Copying or distributing a copyrighted work without permission.
Performing or di... More...   $0 (05-12-2023 - NY)

New York, New York civil litigation lawyers represented plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories under 17 U.S.C. 101.

Plaintiff Structured Asset Sales, LLC, as a beneficial owner of the copyright to the 1973 hit song "Let's Get It On," brings this action against Defendants Edward Christopher Sheeran, Atlantic Recording Corporation, BDi Music Ltd., Bucks Music Grou... More...   $0 (05-04-2023 - NY)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, dis... More...   $0 (04-26-2023 - OK)

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement law theory.

"
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter asking the Court to extend the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (ECF No. 19.) This is the fifth request for an extension of Defendants' deadline. (See ECF Nos. 11, ... More...   $0 (04-11-2023 - NY)

Danny Lamont Chambers and Dontell Rayvon-Eddie Smith allege that Detective Ronald Sanders and his employer, the City of Detroit, violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to familial integrity by procuring the wrongful
conviction and incarceration of their father, Danny Burton. Even assuming that the plaintiffs
have identified a substantive right protected by the Due Process Clause, thei... More...   $0 (04-03-2023 - MI)

Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory.

15 U.S.C. 1114 provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution... More...   $0 (03-29-2023 - OK)

Davenport, Iowa Lanham Act lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on Trademark Infringement Act violation theories claiming $940,000 in damages.

The Lanham Act also provides federal causes of action for trademark dilution, cybersquatting, and several unfair competition claims, such as unregistered trademark infringement (including claims for infringement of unregistered trade d... More...   $0 (03-28-2023 - AZ)

New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.... More...   $0 (03-24-2023 - NY)