Christopher Sadowski v. Romanian-American Network, Inc. |
Chicago, Illinois intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Gregory P. Mango v. The Blark Wall Street Times, Inc. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma copyright lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Gregory P. Mango v. Newsmax Media, Inc. |
West Palm Beach, Florida intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
United States of America v. Jeffrey Carl Cunningham |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated sexual assault abuse of a minor under the age of 12 in Indian Country in violation of 18 USC 1151, 1153, and 2241(c). |
Michael Stokes v. Gold Productions, Inc., d/b/a Girls Night Out The Show |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma copyright infringement lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 501. |
Mark Remme v. Walmart, Inc., et al. |
Santa Ana, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory. |
Evofem Biosciences, Inc. v. Padagis Israel Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. |
Newark, New Jersey intellectual property litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff, who sued the Defendants on patent infringement theories. |
DP Creations v. Frank Li, d/b/a "Dollbie" |
Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Jose Ruiz v. Paramount Global, Inc. |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Ajay Suresh v. Koyfin, Inc. and Rob Boris Koyfman |
New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
James Messerschmidt v. EE Bar, LLC |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff that sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.... More... $0 (08-04-2023 - NY) |
United States of America v. Tyler James Stephens |
Muskogee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with stalking, attempted first degree burglary in Indian Country, attempted sexual abuse, first degree burglary and coercion and enticement. |
Dawn Cutillo, et al. v. David Cutillo, et al. |
Allentown, Pennsylvania intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories. |
Laurie Rubin v. Trendland, L.L.C. |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory in violation of 17 U.S.C. 501, which provides: |
John Kraljevich v. Courser Athletics, Inc. |
Boston, Massachusetts intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories. |
Amy Licht v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al. |
Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories. |
Veranique Payton and Felton Payton, Jr. v. National Continental Insurance Company |
New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant in an auto insurance liability theory. |
Nathan Hansen v. Windsong Ranch Community Association, Inc. et al. |
Sherman, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory. |
James Halverson v. Debra Anne Haaland, Secretary of the Internior |
Billings, Montana real property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking to quiet title to n 86.42% interest, or 690.54 acres, in Allotment 1809 from the United States as trust holder to the Estate of Jack Halverson ("Jack's estate"), and (2) a fee patent deed conveying Jack's estate's interest in Allotment 1809 to Jack's heir.... More... $0 (05-31-2023 - MT) |
Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry Internsational Corp. v. Nearmap, U.S., Inc.; Nearmap Austrial Pty, Ltd.; and Nearmap, Ltd. |
Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property law lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in patent infringement throries. |
Michael W. Hayes, Jr. v. Transportation Insurance Company, et al. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer sued Defendants on auto negligence and medical malpractice theories. |
B.E. Technology, LLC v. Twitter, Inc. and Google, LLC |
Wilmington, Delaware patent infringement lawyer represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendants claiming that they were violating "United States Patent Nos, 8,549,410 (“the '410 patent”), 8,549,411 (“the '411 patent”), and 8,769,440 (“the '440 patent”) (collectively “the Asserted Patents”). D.1.1. All of the /Asserted Patents expired in 2018. D.I. 67 at 2. |
Christopher Sadowski v. Impcto Latin New,s Inc., d/b/a Impacto Latino |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. WINSTON WHITECROW BRESTER |
¶1 This is a consolidated appeal of orders issued by the District Court of Ottawa County, the Honor... More... $0 (05-11-2023 - OK) |
Kathryn Townsend Griffin, et al. v. Edward Christopher Sheeran a/k/a "Ed Sheeran," et al. |
New York, New York civil litigation lawyers represented plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories under 17 U.S.C. 101. |
Next Page |