Steven A.W. De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation |
Portland, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under the Landham Act. |
Mark Post v. MT Dank Tank LLC, et al. |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma copyright infringement lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a copyright |
Seffrey B. Sedlik v. Katherine Von Drachenberg, a/k/a Kat Von D |
Los Angeles, California intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendants in a copyright infringement dispute. |
United States of America v. Benjamin Adu Acheampong |
Cincinnati, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with romance-fraud conspiracy and making false statements on a COVID‑relief application. |
Scott Hargis, D/B/A Scott Hargis Photo v. Pacifica Senior Living Management LLC, et al. |
Los Angeles, California intellectual property law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory 17 U.S.C. 501, which provides: |
Devona Habiburrahman and Mohammed Habiburrahman v. Dorliea H. Wehye, et al. |
Tenton, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories. |
Alana Marie Souza, et al. v. Brick House, Inc. |
Eugene, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a 15 U.S.C. 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory. |
United States of America v. Jon Q. Wright v. Cornhole Stop, LLC and Shirley Kowtko |
Detroit, Michigan intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on copyright infringement theories. $1 (12-06-2023 - MI) |
Daniel William McKnight v. LawNewz, Inc. |
New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe |
Akron, Ohio intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on 17 U.S.C. 101 a copyright infringement theory. |
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Roosters Cocktails, Inc. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 101. |
Reed Timmer v. Medialinks TV, LLC |
Washington, DC intellectual property lawyer represent the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright violation theory under 17 U.S.C. 501. |
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe |
Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copy right infringement theory. |
Allan Tannenbaum v. CityRealty.com, LLC |
New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyrights infringement law. |
Christopher Sadowski v. Romanian-American Network, Inc. |
Chicago, Illinois intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Mark Remme v. Walmart, Inc., et al. |
Santa Ana, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory. |
Gregory P. Mango v. The Blark Wall Street Times, Inc. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma copyright lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Gregory P. Mango v. Newsmax Media, Inc. |
West Palm Beach, Florida intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
United States of America v. Jeffrey Carl Cunningham |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated sexual assault abuse of a minor under the age of 12 in Indian Country in violation of 18 USC 1151, 1153, and 2241(c). |
Michael Stokes v. Gold Productions, Inc., d/b/a Girls Night Out The Show |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma copyright infringement lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 501. |
Evofem Biosciences, Inc. v. Padagis Israel Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. |
Newark, New Jersey intellectual property litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff, who sued the Defendants on patent infringement theories. |
DP Creations v. Frank Li, d/b/a "Dollbie" |
Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
United States of America v. Tyler James Stephens |
Muskogee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with stalking, attempted first degree burglary in Indian Country, attempted sexual abuse, first degree burglary and coercion and enticement. |
Jose Ruiz v. Paramount Global, Inc. |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Ajay Suresh v. Koyfin, Inc. and Rob Boris Koyfman |
New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Next Page |