| United States of America v. Paul David Mitchell, II |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of bank rubbery. |
| United States of America v. Marlon Alonzo Smith |
|
Salt Lake City, Utah, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of controlled substance (drugs) with intent to distribute. |
| State of Oklahoma v. B.B.S. |
|
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. G.L.T. |
|
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Arizona v. Steven Peterson |
|
Holbrook, Arizona, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant was charged with five counts of sexual conduct with a minor and three counts of luring a minor for sexual exploitation. |
| United States of America v. |
|
|
| State of Nebraska v. Ivell M. Hagens |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, first degree sexual assault of a child, a Class IB felony 1; incest |
| United States of America v. James L. Hattten, II |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking a minor in violation of 18 U.S. 1591. |
| Justin Hooper v. The City of Tulsa |
|
Justin Hooper and the City of Tulsa dispute whether the Curtis Act, 30 Stat. 495 (1898), grants Tulsa jurisdiction over municipal violations committed by all Tulsa’s inhabitants, including Indians, in Indian country. Tulsa issued a traffic citation to Mr. Hooper, an Indian and member of the Choctaw Nation, and he paid a $150 fine for the ticket in Tulsa’s Municipal Criminal Court (“municipal $0 (06-28-2023 - OK) |
| MARVIN KEITH STITT, Appellant v. THE CITY OF TULSA, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellant, Marvin Keith Stitt, was convicted of Aggravated Speeding (Tulsa, Okla., Rev. Ordinances Title 37, § 617(C) (2021)) following a non-jury trial before the Honorable Mitchell McCune, Municipal Judge, and fined $250.00 in City of Tulsa Municipal Court Citation/Case No. 7569655. |
| CITY OF TULSA, Appellant v. NICHOLAS RYAN O'BRIEN, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellee, Nicholas Ryan O'Brien, was charged by Information in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa with the following misdemeanor traffic crimes: |
| JERRY LEE IRWIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellant, Jerry Lee Irwin, was convicted by a jury in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2021-3185, of Count 1: Assault and Battery with a Deadly Weapon, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 652(C); Count 4: Kidnapping, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 741; Count 5: Possession of a Firearm After Former Conviction, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2019, § 1283(A); and Count 6: Traffick $0 (08-22-2024 - OK) |
| THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellant v. STEVEN LEON FULLER, Appellee. |
|
¶1 The State of Oklahoma appeals the order of the reviewing judge affirming an adverse ruling of the magistrate dismissing the criminal charges in Ottawa County District Court Case No. CF-2022-215 for lack of jurisdiction. See 22 O.S.2011, §§ 1089.1--1089.7; Rule 6.1, Rules of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, Title 22, Ch.18, App. (2024). |
| MICHAEL GARY PARKER, JR., Appellant v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee. |
|
¶1 Appellant Michael Gary Parker, Jr. appeals his Judgment and Sentence from the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2018-3184, for First Degree Manslaughter, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 711.1 Parker's jury unanimously found him guilty, but deadlocked on the issue of punishment. The Honorable William J. Musseman, Jr., District Judge, who presided over Parker's jury trial, sentenced Pa $0 (07-15-2021 - OK) |
| THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellant v. DALTON WAYNE WARD, Appellee |
|
¶1 The State of Oklahoma, Appellant, appeals from an order sustaining Appellee's motion to dismiss a charge of assault and battery on a police officer filed in the District Court of Mayes County, Case No. CF-2019-295. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing on Appellee's motion to dismiss, and, relying on McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), and Hogner v. State, 2021 OK CR 4, 500 P.3d $0 (08-18-2022 - OK) |
| John Hogner v. State of Oklahoma |
|
¶1 Appellant Travis John Hogner was charged and tried by jury for Feloniously Pointing a Firearm (21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 1289.16) or in the alternative Domestic Assault with a Dangerous Weapon (21 O.S.Supp.2014, § 644) (Count I); Possession of a Firearm, After Former Conviction of a Felony (21 O.S. Supp.2014, § 1283) (Counts II and III); Kidnapping (21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 751 (Count V); Interferenc $0 (03-11-2021 - OK) |
| State ex rel. Matloff v. Wallace |
|
¶1 The State of Oklahoma, by Mark Matloff, District Attorney of Pushmataha County, petitions this Court for the writ of prohibition to vacate the Respondent Judge Jana Wallace's April 12, 2021 order granting post-conviction relief. Judge Wallace's order vacated and dismissed the second degree murder conviction of Clifton Merrill Parish in Pushmataha County Case No. CF-2010-26. Because the Respond $0 (08-12-2021 - OK) |
| Eddie L. Bolden v. Angelo Pesavento, et al. |
|
Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sue on civil rights violation theories claiming that he was wrongfully charged, convicted, and incarcerated. |
| T.N. v. First Baptist Church of Pierce City |
|
Mount Vernon, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a corporate negligence theory. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Dustin Joel Walker |
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer is representing the Defendant charged sexually abusing a child. |
| State of Oklahoma v. timmy Lee Stidman and Bryant Rodney Stidman |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Marquis Donnell Washington |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Bernard Vaughn Moore |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Myangel Gail Puckett and Porscia Louann Majors |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Daniel Murray Patty |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with |
|
Next Page |