Pikeville, Kentucky employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.

AI Overview

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) covers minimum wage, overtime pay, and child labor standards for most private and public sector employees. It mandates that employees receive at least the federal minimum wage, and overtime pay at a rate of t

Corsicana, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with theft of cargo in violation of Texas Penal Code § 31.18.

On January 25, 2017, Appellant entered the premises of Corsicana Bedding in
Navarro County. He backed his semi-truck up to a trailer containing mattresses that had
been manufactured at the bedding facility. The trailer containing the mattres

Houston, Texas, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.c. 1983.

On December 26, 2019, at approximately 7:19 p.m., Deputy Jose Nunez of the Harris County Sheriff’s Office responded to a 911 call reporting a suspected in-progress home invasion. The caller, Sandra Garibay, informed the dispatcher that she had locked herself and her

Morristown, New Jersey, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful death negligence theory.

The essential facts are undisputed. On September 23, 2020, plaintiffs, accompanied by their minor child, C.T., and then sixty-nine-year-old father and grandfather, Anthony Timpanaro ("decedent"), traveled to defendants' beachfront property to spend the day. By all accou

Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on product liability theories.

AI Overview

Massachusetts product liability law holds manufacturers, distributors, and sellers strictly liable for injuries caused by defective products, meaning you don't need to prove negligence.

You can file a claim for a product that has a design defect, ma

Savannah, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a produce liability theory.

See: 11th Circuit, 25-13895-A, State Court of Chatham County, Georgia, STCV23-02341

Honolulu, Hawaii, personal injury lawyers represent the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

Portland, Oregon employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.

Zoe Hollis, a dancer at a Portland strip club called Sassy’s, sued the club’s owners and managers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“the FLSA” or “the Act”) for misclassifying its dancers as independent contractors and violating corresponding wage and hou

New Haven, Connecticut, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs.

Google A.I.:

Federal conspiracy to distribute controlled substances is a serious criminal charge under
21 U.S.C. § 846 that targets an agreement between two or more individuals to violate federal drug laws, such as manufacturing or distributing illegal drugs

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

1. FALSELY PERSONATE ANOTHER TO CREATE LIABILITY

2. DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL

3. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN INSURANCE OR SECURITY

4. OPERATE VEHICLE AT SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE & PROPER

5. FAILURE TO WEAR SEATBELT

Las Vegas, Nevada commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking a writ of prohibition or, alternatively, mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim in a consumer protection action.

The State of Nevada filed a complaint against petitioners TikTok, Inc., and its related entiti

Canton, South Dakota insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Mark Fiechtner was in a motor vehicle accident in April 2018. Following the accident, Fiechtner sought medical treatment for neck pain, vision issues, and problems with his memory. Fiechtner made a claim for payment of medical benefits to his insurer, American Wes

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with maintaining a drug involved premises.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sue on civil rights violation theories claiming that he was wrongfully charged, convicted, and incarcerated.

Bolden was arrested in February 1994 for the murders of Irving Clayton and Derrick Frazier and the attempted murder
of Clifford Frazier. A jury found him guilty in October 1996, and he was sentenced to life

Mount Vernon, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a corporate negligence theory.

The uncontroverted material facts establish that FBC is a Southern Baptist church and that Plaintiff participated in FBC's youth ministries program.A youth pastor led FBC's youth ministries program and transported participants, including Plaintiff and others, to and from said

Belfast, Maine insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who brought a reach-and-apply action that Rowe brought pursuant to 24-A M.R.S. § 2904 (2019).[1] See Ashe v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2003 ME 147, ¶ 14, 838 A.2d 1157 ("The reach and apply statute . . . enables a judgment creditor to have insurance money applied to the satisfaction of [a] judgment by bringing an action against the judgment debt

Norman, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyer represented the Defendant on a premises liability theory.

The Plaintiff claimed that on July 10, 2021, she was a customer at the Westlake Ace Hardware store in Oklahoma City and was injured and/or damaged as a result of a dangerous condition on the property that caused her to trip and fall.

Portland, Oregon, insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on bad faith breach of contract theory.

AI Overview

Oregon bad faith insurance law has significantly evolved, particularly with the 2023 Moody v. Oregon Community Credit Union decision, which allows policyholders to sue insurers for certain unfair claims handling practices under a common law negligence claim. T

Missoula, Montana, insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

AI Overview
In Montana, an insurance company breaches the implied covenant of "good faith" by knowingly or recklessly failing to settle a claim or by acting with unfair or deceptive practices, such as misrepresenting policy provisions, unreasonably delaying a claim, o

Minneapolis, Minnesota, personal injury lawyers presented the Plaintiff who who on a product liability theory.

AI Overview

Minnesota product liability law holds manufacturers, distributors, and retailers accountable for harm caused by defective products under a

strict liability standard. This means an injured party does not need to prove negligence, but must show the pro

Columbus, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance.

Under federal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit a criminal act, coupled with an intent to achieve the goal. In many cases, the government must also prove that at least one member of the conspiracy took an "overt act" in furthe

Columbus, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Under federal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit a criminal act, coupled with an intent to achieve the goal. In many cases, the government must also prove that at least one member of the conspiracy took an "overt act" in furtherance of

Detroit, Michigan, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability claim.

AI Overview

Michigan premises liability law holds property owners accountable for injuries caused by a failure to maintain a safe property. To succeed in a claim, a person must prove the property owner was negligent, meaning they knew or should have known about a dangerous condition

San Antonio, Texas, commercial litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a fraud claim.

On September 16, 2022, Sage filed its original petition against Sarah, Lingle, and Aura. Sage alleged Sarah, individually and on behalf of Aura, committed violations of the Texas Theft Liability Act against Sage for her and Lingle's benefit. Sage additionally asserted Sarah committed fraud by non-

Rochester, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability claim.

This case was filed in the Supreme Court, Monroe County, New York, and was removed to federal court by Target Corporation.

New York premises liability law holds property owners responsible for injuries caused by dangerous conditions on their property, provided they were negligent