| Carolyn Hall v. Sheppard Pratt Health System, Inc. |
|
Baltimore, Maryland, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff title VII failure to accommodate theory. |
| New York State Firearms Association, et al. v. Steven G. James, et al. |
|
Buffalo, New York, civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff seeking an injunction. |
| Malcolm Scott and De’Marchoe Carpenter v. City of Tulsa, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| United States of America v. Preston Buie |
|
Mobile, Alabama, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute cocaine and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. |
| Robert W. Otto and Julies H. Hamilton v. City of Boca Radon, Florida and County of Palm Beach, Florida |
|
Miami, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on civil rights violation theories un 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| Chanetlle Jones v. City of Sarasota Springs |
|
Salt lake City, Utah personal injury laweyrs represented the Plaintiff who soed on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. $1 (10-20-2025 - UT) |
| Joseph Santarlas v. Bowtech, Inc., et al. |
|
Salt Lake City, Utah, civil and commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in an anti-trust case. |
| Jace Hill v. Equifax Information Services, LLC. et al. |
|
Pocatello, Idaho, consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory. |
| Brook Lang, M.D. v. Providence Health and Services |
|
Spokane, Washington, employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who used on a employment discrimination civil rights violation theory. $0 (10-19-2025 - WA) |
| Stephen Berger v. Costco Wholesale Corporation |
|
Juneau, Alaska, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an employment discrimination theory. |
| Harsh Alkutkar v. Bumble, Inc. and Bumble Holding, Ltd. |
|
Oakland, California, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a false advertising theory. |
| Estate of Ian Simmers v. County of King, et al. |
|
Seattle, Washington, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights violation claim. |
| United States of America v. Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez, Sr. v. City of Oontairo, et al. |
|
San Bernardino, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. |
| United States of America v. Kate Carson |
|
Nashville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with international parental kidnapping. |
| United States of America v. Jaison L. Coleman |
|
Madison, Wisconsin, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm. |
| B.A., et al. v. Tri County Area Schools, et al. |
|
Rapid City, Michigan civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who claimed that their Constitutional Rights were violated by the Defendants. |
| Reuben Jelani Adams, et al. v. Lexington-Dayette Urban County Government, et al. |
|
Lexington, Kentucky, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on civil rights violation theories. |
| Malik Allah-U-Akbar, fka Odraye G. Jones v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden |
|
Cleveland, Ohio, civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff seeking a writ of habeas corpus. |
| Tammy McKee v. City of Skiatook, Oklahoma |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a wrongful death civil rights violation theory. $0 (10-14-2025 - OK) |
| Flying T Ranch, Inc. v. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, et al. |
|
Under federal common law, Indian tribes may be sued only under two circumstances: when a tribe waives its sovereign immunity or when Congress unequivocally abrogates tribal sovereign immunity. Here, Flying T Ranch (Flying T) filed suit in Snohomish County Superior Court to quiet title to nonreservation land purchased by the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians (Tribe). Flying T contends it had acquired $0 (10-10-2025 - WA) |
| United States of America v. Keaton Overton Gunnels |
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico, pro se defendant charged with two counts of making a false statement on a loan or credit application. |
| Billy Gowans, Jr. v. Zachary Axom, et al. |
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania pro se Plaintiff challenged reverse mortgage executed by his Mother. |
| Chhean Jones v. United States of America, et al. |
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania pro se Plaintiff sued on constitutional rights violations. |
| Christian Waller v. City of New York |
|
New York City, New York, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory. |
| Stanley Holmes v. City of New York |
|
New York City, New York, prisoner civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a Constitutional rights violation theory. $0 (10-10-2025 - NY) |
|
Next Page |