Probable Cause Law
 
State of Oklahoma v. Danna Renea Olden



Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon in violation of 21 O.S. 645 and malicious injury to property in violation of 21 O.S. 1760.




Every person who, with intent to do bodily harm and without justifiable or excusable cause, commits any assault

More...   $0 (07-03-2024 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Michael Dean Badgwell


Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with assault and battery with a deadly weapon in violation of 21 O.S. 652.



A. Every person who intentionally and wrongfully shoots another with or discharges any kind of firearm, with intent to kill any person, including an unborn child as defined in Section 1-

More...   $0 (07-02-2024 - OK)

State of New Mexico, ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Ray B.


Lovington, New Mexico indian law lawyer represented the defendant in a guardianship disputes.




Respondent-Appellant (Father), father of E.B and E.B. (collectively, Children), appeals from the district court's adjudication of abuse and neglect. Children are eligible for membership in the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma tribe,[1] and therefore, this case is governed by the

More...   $0 (06-27-2024 - )

United States of America v. Michael David Winbigler


Amarillo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute fentanyl.



21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) - POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE FENTANYL

(a) Unlawful acts

Except as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally-

(1) to

More...   $0 (07-03-2024 - TX)

Vitzeslav Zeif v. Marina Aslanyan and SmartLinux Solutions, LLC


Charleston, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.



This case was filed in the Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, 2024CP1001305, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The following facts are presented in SmartLinx Solutions, LLC's (“SmartLinx”) Verified Amended Complaint, and as

More...   $0 (07-03-2024 - SC)

Docas Githinji, et al. v. Olympia Police Department, et al.


Tacoma, Washington civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on constitutional rights violations theories.



This case was filed in the : Thurston County Superior Court, 22-00002-00356-34, and was removed to federal court by the Olympia Police Department.

On the evening of January 26, 2020, Plaintiff Jake Shriver called 911 and reported he was h

More...   $0 (07-03-2024 - WA)

Julie A. Su v. United States Postal Service


Tacoma, Washington employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Occupation Safety and Health law violation theory.

29 U.S.C. 651: A federal act passed in 1970 to ensure a minimum level of safety in working conditions. The act is codified in 29 U.S.C. §§ 651–678. The Act may also be referred to as the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1

More...   $0 (07-03-2024 - WA)

The People of the State of Colorado v. Tommy Rae Mickey


Grand Junction, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant who was ordered to pay restitution.




Mickey pleaded guilty to second degree burglary and vehicular eluding.1 On October 7, 2020, he was sentenced to six years in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections. On June 29, 2021, more than 250 days after the sentencing hearing, the distr

More...   $0 (12-14-2023 - CO)

United States of America v. Mark Joseph Rodriguez


Alexandria, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with engaging in a dogfighting conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371.



18 U.S.C. 371:

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of

More...   $0 (07-02-2024 - VA)

Ed Laur and Maria Laur v. Safeco Insurance Company


Dallas, Texas insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.



Ed and Marla Laur sued Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana after
Safeco denied the Laurs’ claim for water damage to their basement resulting
from a frozen lawn irrigation pipe

The Laurs owned a home in Amarillo, Texas, at the cente

More...   $0 (12-31-2021 - TX)

United States of America v. Robert Horner


Brooklyn, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with felony gun possession in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g).



At 2:18 a.m. on February 14, 2023, New York City Police Depart-
ment ("NYPD") Detective Nicholas Conte began surveilling a
group of people, including Defendant Robert Homer, on Guy R.
Brewer Boulevard between 134th Avenue

More...   $0 (05-24-2024 - NY)

United States of America v. Brian Simms

Indianapolis, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Stealing Nearly $4 Million from Clients in “Ponzi” Scheme

Lebanon Insurance Broker Sentenced to Over Seven Years in Federal Prison for Stealing Nearly $4 Million from Clients in “Ponzi” Scheme<

More...   $0 (06-27-2024 - IN)

David Carpenter, et al. v. Red Lion Trucking, et al.


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained b

More...   $1 (06-04-2024 - OK)

Alaine F. Espinosa Castillo v. Sanchez Rosario and C.R. England, Inc.


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained b

More...   $0 (06-10-2024 - OK)

Jamie Meyer v. Chyma Lumly


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained by t

More...   $1 (06-28-2024 - OK)

Joseph G. Lee and Stephanie Campos v. Miram Abunow, et al.


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence and auto insurance theories.



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:

First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a d

More...   $1 (06-21-2024 - OK)

Christopher Kenned, et al. v. John Jay Schieber, et al.


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on an auto negligence theory.



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sust

More...   $25000 (06-17-2024 - OK)

Brian R. Hamen, et al. v. Lisa Marie Thompson


Enid, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.



The first element of negligence is a duty of care. This means that the defendant had a legal obligation to act in a specific way to prevent harm or injury to the plaintiff. The second element is a breach of that duty of care. This establishes that the def

More...   $1 (06-05-2024 - OK)

United States of America v. Christopher Brittenum

Oxford, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Drug Trafficking

Memphis Man Sentenced to Ten Years for Drug Trafficking


A Memphis man was sentenced to ten years in prison for distributing methamphetamin

More...   $0 (06-25-2024 - MS)

Berry Williams v. Laura Elliott


Tucson, Arizona civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.



Prison officials have a legal duty under the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution to refrain from using excessive force and to protect prisoners from assault by other prisoners. Officers may not use force maliciously or sadistically with intent to cause

More...   $0 (06-28-2024 - AZ)

States of Arizona v. Anthony Martinez


Flagstaff, Arizona criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first-degree murder and aggravated child abuse for starving his 6-year-old son to death.



Anthony Martinez, age 27, locked Deshaun Martinez in a tiny bedroom closet for 16 hours a day over a month with his older brother as punishment for stealing food in the home at night while their paren

More...   $0 (06-29-2024 - AZ)

State of Florida v. Zephen Allen Xaver


Sebring, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with five counts of first-degree murder.



Zephen Xaver, age 27, was accused to killing five women inside a Florida ban in 2019.

The victims included customer Cynthia Watson, 65; bank teller coordinator Marisol Lopez, 55; banker trainee Ana Pinon-Williams, age 38, bank teller Debra Cook,

More...   $0 (06-28-2024 - FL)

Rosa Orozco v. Schindler Elevator Corporation


Trenton, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an elevator negligence theory.



"On July 17, 2018, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an important ruling on an elevator negligence case that is likely to impact similar cases involving elevator accidents and complex issues of negligence and liability.

In the case, NJ Supreme Cour

More...   $0 (06-28-2024 - NJ)

Kevin Swager v. State of Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with appealing and raises two propositions of error before this Court: (1) his confession was involuntary, and its admission into evidence was error; and (2) the victim impact statement alleged harm from acts outside those charged and tainted the trial court's punishment decision.

More...   $0 (05-02-2024 - OK)

United States of America v. Jeffray Wade Anderson, Jr.


Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first-degree murder in Indian Country.



Violation of: 18 USC 1151, 1153, and 1111: First Degree Murder in Indian Country
(1)
18 USC 1151, 1153, and 1111: Second Degree Murder in Indian Country
(1s)

Government’s Sentencing Memorandum

The Court should accept th

More...   $0 (06-28-2024 - OK)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher