| State of Oklahoma v. G.L.T. |
|
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Russell Jones v. City of Tempe, et al. |
|
Phoenix, Arizona civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking reimbursement for attorney fees expended in an effort to obtain body-camera footage of his arrest. |
| United States of America v. |
|
|
| CITY OF TULSA, Appellant v. NICHOLAS RYAN O'BRIEN, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellee, Nicholas Ryan O'Brien, was charged by Information in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa with the following misdemeanor traffic crimes: |
| JERRY LEE IRWIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellant, Jerry Lee Irwin, was convicted by a jury in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2021-3185, of Count 1: Assault and Battery with a Deadly Weapon, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 652(C); Count 4: Kidnapping, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 741; Count 5: Possession of a Firearm After Former Conviction, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2019, § 1283(A); and Count 6: Traffick $0 (08-22-2024 - OK) |
| THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellant v. STEVEN LEON FULLER, Appellee. |
|
¶1 The State of Oklahoma appeals the order of the reviewing judge affirming an adverse ruling of the magistrate dismissing the criminal charges in Ottawa County District Court Case No. CF-2022-215 for lack of jurisdiction. See 22 O.S.2011, §§ 1089.1--1089.7; Rule 6.1, Rules of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, Title 22, Ch.18, App. (2024). |
| THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellant v. DALTON WAYNE WARD, Appellee |
|
¶1 The State of Oklahoma, Appellant, appeals from an order sustaining Appellee's motion to dismiss a charge of assault and battery on a police officer filed in the District Court of Mayes County, Case No. CF-2019-295. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing on Appellee's motion to dismiss, and, relying on McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), and Hogner v. State, 2021 OK CR 4, 500 P.3d $0 (08-18-2022 - OK) |
| United States of America v. Charles “Chuck” Wright, Amos Durham, Lawson B. Watson |
|
Columbia, South Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with |
| State of Indiana v. Mark Sanchez |
|
Indianapolis, Indiana, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with assault and battery with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Dustin Joel Walker |
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer is representing the Defendant charged sexually abusing a child. |
| United States of America v. Eskender Getchew |
|
Columbus, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawfully prescribed controlled substances, including opioids, without a legitimate medical purpose. |
| United States of America v. Charles “Chuck” Wright, Amos Durham, Lawson B. Watson |
|
Spartanburg, South Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit theft. |
| LaNetra Kellar v. The Yunion, Inc. |
|
Flint, Michigan, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination toery. |
| Gun Owners of America, Inc., et al. v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al. |
|
Bay City, Michigan, civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking a declaratory judgment relating to Michigan firearm law. |
| United States of America v. OJ Rashad Green |
|
Greenbelt, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with distribution of fentanyl in the Accokeek, Maryland area. |
| State of Texas v. Elijah Turner Reyes |
|
El Paso, Texas, man charged with murder. |
| State of Texas v. Brian Pineda Ayala and Caceres Leiva |
|
Dallas, Texas, criminal defense lawyers representing the Defendants charged capital murder. |
| United States of America v. |
|
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stealing checks out of the mail. |
| Alicia Rowe v. State Mutual Insurance Company |
|
Belfast, Maine insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who brought a reach-and-apply action that Rowe brought pursuant to 24-A M.R.S. § 2904 (2019).[1] See Ashe v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2003 ME 147, ¶ 14, 838 A.2d 1157 ("The reach and apply statute . . . enables a judgment creditor to have insurance money applied to the satisfaction of [a] judgment by bringing an action against the judgment debt $0 (09-30-2025 - ME) |
| Moore Urban Renewal Authority v. Milton Cantrell, et al. |
|
Norman, Oklahoma condemnation action. |
| Adair County Board of County Commissioners v. Paul David Rutherford, et al. |
|
Stilwell, Oklahoma, condemnation lawyers represented the Defendants in an eminent domain action. |
| Oklahoma Department of Transportation v. the Blakemore Family Trust, et al. |
|
Stilwell, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented the Defendant in an eminent domain case. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Lynsey Garace Stevenson |
|
Norman, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| United States of America v. Christopher Boisvert |
|
Burlington, Vermont criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with 2024 Robbery Spree. |
| United States of America v. Anthony Clagon |
|
Concord, New Hampshire criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of possession of a firearm and ammunition by a prohibited person. |
|
Next Page |