Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.

This case was initially filed in the Indiana County, 11379 CD 2021, and was removed to federal court by the D

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Rahman.

This case was initially filed in the Allegheny County, GD-0009922, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Camden, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.

This case was initially filed in the Superior Court of Camden County NJ, CAM L 3359 18, and was removed to federal court by the De

Camden, New Jersey personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant.

Camden, New Jersey insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendant's refusal to pay Plaintiff's claim.

This case was initially filed in the Superior Court of Gloucester County, GLO L 873 18, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with fire-bombing a Planned Parenthood facility in Newark, Delaware in January 2020.

Samuel Gulick, of Middletown, was for crimes associated with fire-bombing a Planned Parenthood facility in Newark, Delaware in January 2020.

According to court documents and statements made in open court, at approximat

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued the City of Chicago under the Illinois Domestic Violence Act seeking compensation for the injuries and/or damages suffered by them as a direct result of death of Vanessa Taylor, age 49, who strangled to death by James E. Thompson on June 28, 2015.

Thompson had repeatedly assaulted and battered the mother of five, de

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendant refusal to pay Plaintiff's claim.

This case was initially filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, GD 17-014112, and was removed to federal court by

Greensberg, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered millions in damages as a result of a swimming pool accident that left his paralyzed.

Plaintiff, age 21, suffered a high level spinal cord injury on July 6, 2013 that has resulting in his being confined to a wheelchair, has limited use of his arms and

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by the Defendant.

Stilwell, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of an injury that he sustained when he drove his motorized wheelchair off a four-foot high loading dock when he went through a door that he thought was leading to a ramp.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer car wreck represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant that occurred on April 6, 2018 in Noble, Oklahoma.

Plaintiff sued individually and as parent and next friend of L.L. annd M.E., minors.

Norman, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages.

Plaintiff invested $75,000 for a working interest in a certain well in oil well in Texas.

Plaintiff claimed that Defendants individually and on behalf of Liberty, made false material representations to obtain th

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represent Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a Governmental Tort Claims Act theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a flood of water and sewage in their home on May 21, 2019.

Honolulu, Hawaii insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendant's denial of Plaintiff's claim.

Portland, Oregon personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a general negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

This case was initially filed in the Multnomah County Circuit Court, 19CV47135, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Portland, Oregon personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

This case was initially filed in the Multnomah County Circuit Court, 20CV42910, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Portland, Oregon personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $782,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

Portland, Oregon insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming $200,000 in damages.

Pendleton, Oregon insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a Civil Rights Act violation theory claiming $102,000 in damages.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries.

¶2 Hug filed suit against James on September 22, 2000, alleging that on August 18, 2000, James negligently drove her car into the rear of the car in which Hug was riding, causing personal injuries to Hug. Jam

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a professional negligence theory.

¶1 Plaintiff alleges it sustained damages as a result of Defendants' poor construction and design of its church. In this appeal, Plaintiff seeks review of the trial court's May 2012 order dismissing its negligence theory asserted against Defendant Trinity Group A

Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a wage claim theory.

¶1 Plaintiff, Robert Waits, appeals the decision of the district court finding that a bona fide dispute exists regarding his wage claim against Viersen Oil & Gas Co. (Viersen). This appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36(b), 12

Tulsa, Oklahoma property damage lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on negligence theories.

¶2 Brent Watson (Watson) brought an action on 22 March 2005 against David Gibson and Gibson Capital L.L.C. (collectively called Gibson) for damages to his property. He alleged that Gibson caused a fire which destroyed his property then stored on premises leased from Gibson. At the t