Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck attorney represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a vehicle owned by Stryker and being driven by a Stryker employee while acting within the scope of the employees job.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.

"Broan-NuTone produces Range Hoods, Bath Exhaust Ventilation Fans, Central Vacuum Systems, Doorbe

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a result.

Quincy, Illinois civil litigation trial lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to be entitled to $117,029 in damages for work performed on the Adams County jail.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant Crain on an suto negligence theory and Defendants Quiktrip, et al. on premises liability negligence theories claiming to have been severely injured in an accident caused by Crain while an invitee on at a Quicktrip store.

Plaintiff, a resident of Tulsa County, Oklahoma sued Defendants on various negligence th

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck attorneys represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employee.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Mayes County

Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance law attorneys represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of the breach.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Tulsa County Dist Ct, CJ-20-01721, and was removed to federal court

Owasso, Oklahoma civil trial insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of the breach of contract by Defendant.

Plaintiff, Sande Sears, and her late husband, Wiley Sears, resided at their home in Skiatook, Oklahoma. As a disabled veteran, Mr. Sears was eligible for

Buffalo, New York personal injury car wreck attorney represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s negligence.


The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the

Omaha, Nebraska personal injury attorneys represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a medical malprctice negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of substandard medical care.

Plaintiff claimed that their child was sent home following an accidental fall and then suffered seizures that left her permanently disabled.

Vivianne Marous

Winston-Salem, North Carolina personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights violation theory claiming that Darrell Dowdy, in his official capacity, fabricated evidence against him that result in him being wrongfully convicted of a felony and sentenced to 80-years in prison in 2016.

11/15/2021 308 Transcript of Proceedings held on 11/10/2021, before

Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

This case was filed in the Tulsa County District Court, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance law attorney represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

this case was filed in the Nowata County, CJ-19-00036, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an insurance law theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and injuries as a result of Defendant's wrongful conduct.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Plaintiff claimed that she was injured in a car wreck caused by Anderson that occurred on November 26, 2011

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a car wreck caused by Defendant.

Plaintiff claimed she was injured in a car wreck that occurred on December 16, 2016.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a car wreck caused by Defendant.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a car wreck caused by Hundley.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a car wreck caused by Defendant.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care in the operation of her vehicle.

Stillwater, Oklahoma personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Plaintiff claimed to have been injured in a car wreck that occurred on

Stillwater, Oklahoma personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on an auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Government Tort Claims Act and auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.