Williamsport, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming more than $75,000 in damages.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 17-11578, and was removed to federal court by the Defend

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result.

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury medical malpractice lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on medical negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of substandard medical care provided by Defendants' employees.

Cleveland, Ohio civil trail lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on personal injury negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care by one or more of Defendants' employees.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially fi

Cleveland, Ohio trial lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on a personal injury theory claiming to have suffered $325,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of wrongful, acts, errors and/or omissions on the part of Defendants or their officers, agents and/or employees.

St. Louis, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $25,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees in Defendant's store.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially

St. Louis, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Jurisdiction of this action in this Honorable Court is pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1332(a)(2). Plaintiffs and all Defendants are residents an

Cape Girardeau, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Dumas' negligence.

Boston, Massachusetts employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights gender discrimination theories claiming to have been discriminated against by the City of Boston's male-dominated police force.

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

I. Nature of the Action
1. Plaintiff Donna Gavin (“Gavin”), brings this action against the City of Bos

Pensacola, Florida personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on product liability theories claiming that the Combat Arms Earplugs version 2 (CAEv2) were defective and, as a direct result, he suffered hearing loss despite using the earplugs.

This is a so called "Bellwether" trial in a massive multidistrict litigation over the Combat Arms Earplugs version 2 (CAEv2)

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania employment lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a result of wrongful employment acts, errors or omissions.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights violation theories claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the violation by Defendants of his Constitutional rights.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights violation theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the violation of his constitutionally protected rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights violation theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the violation of Plaintiff's Constitutionally protected rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $1 million in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and/or sold by Defendants.

Ethicon Products division is a leading maker of sutures and wound-closure products, inc

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on product liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and/or sold by Defendants.

Philips RS North America LLC manufactures and markets medical devices. The Company offe

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury medical malpractice lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a medical negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of substandard medical care.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

This case was initially filed in the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, 06-06682, and was removed to federal court by the De

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury premises liablity lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

This case was initially filed in the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, 170901781, and was removed to fede

Allentown, Pennsylvania personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Wichita, Kansas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant.

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Jason Bernhardt while driving for Reynolds & Reynolds Cattle, L.L.C.

Kansas City, Kansas insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the breach.

This case was initially filed in the District Court of Bourbon County, Kansas, 2020-CV-000055, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.