New York, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and sold by Defendant.

Wright Wright Medical Group N.V. is a global medical device company focused on Extremities and Biolog

New York, NY- Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liablity theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and reasonably dangerous product manufactured and sold by Defendant.

Cause: 49:40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act

Personal Inj. Prod. Liability

White Plains, NY - Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical neglience theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of substandard medical care provided to Ashley Meg Greene, deceased.

New York, New York personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

New York, NY - Personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

White Plains, NY - Personal injury premises liablity lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

New York, NY - Personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Based upon the foregoing, the Court concludes that Defendant failed to satisfy its burden of establishing that the amount-in-controversy exceeds

New York, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Air Transport Safety and System Stabilization Act violations claiming to have been injured and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants' wrongful acts errors and/or omission.

New York, New York personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and sold by Defendant.

New York, New York personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued General Mortors, LLC on motor vehicle product liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and sold by GM.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury negligence lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on a premises liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a result of the the failure on the part of the Defendant's employees to operate and maintain a safe environment for business invitees.

New York, New York civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendants on breach of contract theories claiming damages of $190,000.00.

New York, New York securities law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a Stockholder Suites Securities Exchange Act violation theories claiming $5 million in damages.

White Plains, New York insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on breach of insurance contract theories claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a result of the breach by Defendant.

Daville, Virginia employee benefits insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an E.R.I.S.A. refusal to pay benefits theory claiming $300,000 in damages.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Henry County Circuit Court, CL21-437, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Roanoke, Virginia premises liability slip and fall personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially fil

Roanoke, Virginia truck wreck wrongful death personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result the death of Michael Bedford who was killed in an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

New Haven, Connecticut personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liablity theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result a defective and unreasonably dangerous product.

New Haven, Connecticut personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

New Haven, Connecticut personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

New Haven, Connecticut personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on assault, libel or slander theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendant's wrongful conduct.

Tulsa, OK - Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Plaintiff claimed that Defendant ran into her car near _44 and SH-51 in Tulsa County on April 19, 2019 inj

Tulsa, OK - Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Defendant Eva Woods was driving a Crew Cab pickup south on South 81st West Avenue approaching the inter

Oklahoma City, OK - Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Oklahoma City, OK - Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

The accident that gave rise to this case occurred on July 7, 2014 between a vehicle driven by Da