| Punitive Damages Law |
| |
|
David Carpenter, et al. v. Red Lion Trucking, et al.
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained b
More... $1 (06-04-2024 - OK)
|
|
Alaine F. Espinosa Castillo v. Sanchez Rosario and C.R. England, Inc.
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained b
More... $0 (06-10-2024 - OK)
|
|
Jamie Meyer v. Chyma Lumly
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained by t
More... $1 (06-28-2024 - OK)
|
|
Joseph G. Lee and Stephanie Campos v. Miram Abunow, et al.
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence and auto insurance theories.
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a d
More... $1 (06-21-2024 - OK)
|
|
Christopher Kenned, et al. v. John Jay Schieber, et al.
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on an auto negligence theory.
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sust
More... $25000 (06-17-2024 - OK)
|
|
Brian R. Hamen, et al. v. Lisa Marie Thompson
|
Enid, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.
The first element of negligence is a duty of care. This means that the defendant had a legal obligation to act in a specific way to prevent harm or injury to the plaintiff. The second element is a breach of that duty of care. This establishes that the def
More... $1 (06-05-2024 - OK)
|
|
Dexy Sosa Martinez v. Cragi Catli and Lauren Johnson
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
In Oklahoma, the ability to pursue damages under comparative negligence applies when a crash victim is 49 percent or less liable for the accident. If a crash victim is at least 50 percent liable for the wreck, he or she can't seek compensation from other at-fault part
More... $1 (06-12-2024 - OK)
|
|
Astrid Orellana, et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
|
Los Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories. a
This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, County of Clark, A-23-869450-C, and was removed to federal court by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint.
Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. Thi
More... $1 (06-30-2024 - )
|
|
Jennifer Arreola v. C.R. England, Inc.
|
Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, a-23-868245-c, and was removed to federal court by C.R. England, Inc.
Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. This rule allows for the distribution of fault among all
More... $0 (06-28-2024 - NV)
|
|
Timothy Reed v. Joseph Brian Quagliata
|
Prescott, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Coconino County Superior Court, S0300CV202300324, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Arizona operates under a “comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they
More... $1 (06-28-2024 - AZ)
|
|
Justin Kirt v. Deon Hamilton, Knight Brothers, L.L.C., and Intermountain OM Holdings, LLC
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendants on auto negligence theories
This case was filed in the District Court, LeFlore County District Court, CJ-24-00074, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for instance, will have thei
More... $1 (06-28-2024 - OK)
|
|
Lars Freisberg v. Tulsa Retina Consultants, P.L.L.C.
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma breach of contract lawyers represented the parties in a contract dispute.
Lars Freisdberg, Individually and as a Member of Tulsa Retina Consultants, PLLC sued Tulsa Retina Consultants, PLLC. an Oklahoma Professional Limited Liability Company claiming that breached its contract with him.
If a contract has been formed and one party fails to perfor
More... $0 (06-27-2024 - OK)
|
|
James Simmons v. American Western Home Insurance Company
|
Alexandria, Louisiana insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurnce contract theory.
§1973. Good faith duty; claims settlement practices; cause of action; penalties
A. An insurer, including but not limited to a foreign line and surplus line insurer, owes to his insured a duty of good faith and fair deali
More... $1 (06-25-2024 - LA)
|
|
Gary Stephenson v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, dba LOWE'S
|
|
Midland, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.
A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a
premises defect theory. The elements to establish a premises
liability claim are different than those of a traditional negligence
c
More... $1 (06-24-2024 - TX)
|
|
STATE OF KANSAS v. BETH MERRILL
|
|
Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with appealing, contending that the State of Kansas does not have territorial jurisdiction to prosecute this case. In addition, she contended that the district court erred in admitting certain evidence at trial relating to the issue of territorial jurisdiction. She also contended that the district c
More... $0 (06-22-2024 - KS)
|
|
Lauren Ashley Harris v. Deborah Ratcliff and Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
Jackson, Mississippi Personal injury/car wreck lawyer represented the Appellant with appealing, claiming the court erred by (1) allowing Arbor to designate expert witnesses past the discovery deadline; (2) striking Harris’ expert witness due to a discovery violation; (3) denying Harris leave to substitute a witness who had fallen into a coma; and (4) exclud
More... $0 (01-22-2024 - )
|
|
Steven Sauford v. The 3M Company
|
|
St. Louis, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.
This case was filed in the Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, Missouri, 2422-CC00751, and was removed to federal court by The 3M Company.
537.760. Products liability claim defined. — As used in sections 537.760 to
More... $0 (06-17-2024 - MO)
|
|
Jeremy Eaton, et aux. v. DoorDash, Inc.
|
|
Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence law.
This case was filed in the District Court, Douglas County, Colorado, 2023CV30755, and was removed to federal court by DoorDash.
Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is o
More... $1 (06-18-2024 - CO)
|
|
Gloria Martinez v. Walmart, Inc.
|
|
Austin, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 455th Judicial District Court, Travis County, TX, D-1-GN-23-000068, and was removed to federal court by Walmart.
A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a
More... $0 (06-17-2024 - TX)
|
|
Brittany C. Taylor v. Thomas Matwetwe Juma
|
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Pottawatomie County District Court, CJ-22-00292, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for inst
More... $0 (06-14-2024 - OK)
|
|
Marcus Harris a/k/a Peanut v. State of Mississippi
|
|
Jackson, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with appealing, claiming three errors: first, the State’s repeated “use” of “certain critical” testimony allegedly denied him a fair trial; second, defense counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel due tonumerous alleged deficiencies; finally, the evidence allegedly
More... $0 (01-22-2024 - MS)
|
|
Marcus Harris a/k/a Peanut v. State of Mississippi
|
|
Jackson, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with appealing, claiming three errors: first, the State’s repeated “use” of “certain critical” testimony allegedly denied him a fair trial; second, defense counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel due to numerous alleged deficiencies; finally, the evidence allegedly is
More... $0 (01-15-2024 - MS)
|
|
Mark Walker v. Atrium Medical Corporation
|
|
Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.
People injured while using a defective product can seek damages via a product liability lawsuit. In New Hampshire, there are numerous claims that a person can assert in a case seeking damages caused by a harmful product,
More... $0 (06-13-2024 - NH)
|
|
Thomas M. Greene, et al. v. Ada Johnston
|
|
Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a fraud theory claiming $484,000 in damages.
More... $0 (06-12-2024 - MO)
|
|
Torie Bauer v. Equinor Energy, L.P.
|
|
Minot, North Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
North Dakota's Modified Comparative Negligence Rule When you're found to be less than 50% negligent, your share of the blame reduces the damages you can collect by that amount. (N.D. Cent. Code § 32-03.2-02 (2024).)
More... $1 (06-11-2024 - OK)
|
Next Page
|
