Melissa Fischer-Olson v. New York Life Insurance Company |
Sioux Falls, SD: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. $1 (09-29-2021 - SD) |
Gary Pourier v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company |
Rapid City, SD: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. |
Joshua Palmer v. PetroShale US, Inc. |
Minot, ND: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on negligence and respondeat superior tehories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. |
Anthony Montagna v. Jamice E. Schmit |
Missoula, MT: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant, individually and as Trustee of the Janice E. Schmit Living Trust, on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident. $1 (09-24-2021 - MT) |
Stacy Butts v. Rachel L. Stricker |
Billings, MT: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $100,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s negligence. |
Darrell Piapot v. United States of America |
Missoula, MT: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, individually and as parent and guardian ad litem of S.P., a minor, who sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. $0 (09-30-2021 - MT) |
Jami Woodman v. Standard Insurance Company |
Great Falls, MT: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. $0 (09-22-2021 - MT) |
Roy Ryan v. Corizon Health, Inc. |
Cheyenne, WY: Civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of various acts, errors and/or omissions by Defendants' agents or employees. $0 (09-01-2021 - WY) |
Michaun Donner and Louis Smathers v. MX Livestock, LLC |
Cheyenne, WY: Personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on auto negligence and respondea superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. $1 (09-09-2021 - WY) |
Jessica Ann Fox v. Vladimir Makarchuk and EEZ Trucking Inc., |
Cheyenne, WY: Personal injury lawyer truck wreck represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Makarchuck's negligence. $1 (10-12-2021 - WY) |
Harry L. Beaver, Jr. and Pam Beaver v. K & B Transportation, Inc. |
Cheyenne, WY: Personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a negligence and respondeat superior theoriesy claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. $1 (09-07-2021 - WY) |
Charli R. Bruce v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company |
Cheyenne, WY: Insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. |
United States of America, ex rel. James Heron v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Aurora Bank FSB, Aurora Commercial Corp., Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Medved Dale Decker & Deere, LLC |
Denver, CO: Civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on False Claims Act, Qui Tam, violation theories under 31 U.S.C. 3729, which provides: |
Steve Ferraro v. Dillon Companies L.L.C., d/b/a Kroger/Loaf N Jug |
Denver, CO: Personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. |
Margarita Pinkhasova v. Costco Wholesale Corporation |
Denver, CO: Personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. |
Devan Travino v. Dustin Akana and State of Alaska |
Denver, CO: Personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence and responseat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. |
Rebecca Critchlow and Nicole Robertson v. Abdi Farah and KVP Trucking, LLC |
Denver, CO: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on a auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. |
Mathew Mengesha v. Allstate Fire & Casualty Company |
Denver, CO: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. |
Michelle Clifton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
Denver, CO: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, individually and as natural parents and next friends of K.C. and T.C., minors, who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claims. |
Anita Aldrete v. Wal-Mart Supercenter |
Las Cruces, NM: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. |
Michel Kabeja, Eline Nyirambanjika, Jacques Mwiseneza, Uwizeye Nyiramwiza, and Martin Shema v. Krzysztof Brodnicki, JKC Trucking Inc and Safeway Insurance Company |
Albuquerque, NM: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on auto negligence, responseat superior and insurance law theories claiming to have suffered more than $725 million in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employee Krzysztof Brodnicki. $0 (09-20-2021 - NM) |
Tara Lupo v. Sarah Michelle Dahlinghaus and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
Albuquerque, NM: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence and insurance law theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s negligence. |
Todd Lopez, Pauline Ponce, Joe Ponce and Melissa Dominguez v. Redpoint County Mutual Insurance Company |
Albuquerque, NM: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael Ponce |
Melanee Hand v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
Albuquerque, NM: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. |
Dodie Denistran v. Allstate Insurance Company |
Albuquerque, NM: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. |
Next Page |