Santa Ana, CA: ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

San Diego, CA: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, 37-02021-00006690-CU-BC-CTL, and was removed to federal court b

Phoenix, AZ: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court, CV2020-006369, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Minneapolis, MN: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Council Bluffs, IA: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the District Court for Dickinson County, CVCV061971, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Des Moines, IA: Workers' Compensation Benefits Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.


This case was initially filed in the Wayne County, IA, LACV023849, and was removed to federal court by the Defenda

Kansas City, MO: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.


This case was initially filed in the Jackson County Circuit Court, 2116-CV06986, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

St. Louis, MO: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Fayetteville, AR: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Circuit Court of Washington County, 72CV-21-01211, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Little Rock, AR: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, 60CV-21-02964, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Madison, WI: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Circuit Court, Dane County, 2020CV002360, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Milwaukee, WI: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Chicago, IL: Insurance law, E.R.I.S.A., lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.


This case was initially filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, 2021L2874, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Peoria, IL: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

East St. Louis, IL: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Circuit Court, St. Clair County, 21-L-200, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Hammond, IN: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Lake Superior Court 2, 45D02-2003-CT-000259, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Indianapolis, IN: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Marion Superior Court, 49D13-2011-PL-039123, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Terre Haute, IN: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Putnam County Circuit Court, 67C01-2104-CT-000192, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Evansville, IN: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Posey Superior Court, 65D01-2012-PL000392, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Grand Rapids, MI: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $5 million as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Detroit, MI: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Cleveland, OH: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, CV-18-902747, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Akron, OH: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Stark County Common Pleas Court, 2021 CV 00440, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.