Bismarck, North Dakota: Summit Midstream Partners LLC, a North Dakota pipeline company that discharged 29 million gallons of produced water from its pipeline near Williston, North Dakota, over the course of nearly five months in 2014-2015.

The discharge of more than 700,000 barrels of “produced water” – a waste product of hydraulic fracturing – contaminated land, groundwater, and

Albany, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a product liability theories claiming that Ethicon designed, manufactured and sold a product that was defective and unreasonably dangerous and caused them more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages.

"Ethicon is a subsidiary of health care giant Johnson & Johnson. It operates globally and sells its prod

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of an accident caused by one of Defendant's employees.

28 U.S.C. §1332. Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

(a) The district courts shall have original j

Cheyenne, Wyoming Native American Law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract (treaty Violation)theory claiming $1,540,000 in damages.

Providence, Rhode Island personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous produce manufactured and sold by Defendant.

This case was filed in the Kent County Superior Court, KC-21-00397 and was removed to federal

Birmingham, Alabama personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on on a Federal Employer's Liability Act (45 U.S.C. 51) Act wrongful death theory seeking damages for the death of Loudelia C. Branch.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on an auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Plaintiff claimed that on October 4, 2018, she was involved in a car wreck caused by Steven Barbasz who wa

Stillwater, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Leneatta Nelson, individually and as parent and legal gardian of J.N., a minor, sued Sara Marroquin,

Arnett, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Lawton, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Norman, OK: Personal injury wrongful death car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, individually and as parents and next friends of Westlyn Overstreet and Berkley Overstgreet, deceased, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile.


The accident occurred on April 26, 2019 at 12th Avenue NE and Central Parkway in Norman, Oklahoma.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on an auto negligence claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a car wreck caused by Defendants' failure to exercise due care in the operation of their vehicles.

Plaintiff claimed that a vehicle owned by it was damaged in a multi-car accident the occur

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a car wreck caused by Defendant's failure to exercise due care in the operation of her car.

Cincinnati, Ohio civil litigation lawyer represented defendant charged with civil contempt of court for failing to meet the requirements of a negotiated federal consent decree.

The United States sued Klosterman in 2018, alleging Klosterman sexually harassed female tenants since at least 2013 at the 55 residential properties he and his wife Susan Klosterman owned in Sedamsville.

¶1 The dispositive issue presented for review in this abuse of process action filed by the counterclaimants is whether the third-party plaintiff's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence should have been sustained and a verdict directed for the third-party plaintiff.

¶2 We answer in the affirmative and reverse the judgment appealed.

I

¶3 Underlying the lawsuit -

Doc
Duncan v. Ford Motor Credit, Repossessors, Inc., 919 N.W.2d 768(Table) (Iowa App. 2018)
format_size

919 N.W.2d 768 (Table)

Shannon DUNCAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FORD MOTOR CREDIT, REPOSSESSORS, INC. and Bruce Shores, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1122

Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Filed June 20, 2018

Dennis G. Larson of Larson

¶1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit [certifying court] certified the following questions pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S. 1991 ' ' 1601 et seq.:

1. In light of the facts as detailed below that the Defendants Laurance B. Wolfberg and Carolyn Wolfberg either individually or combined instituted four separate lawsuits and filed on