Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.


A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for instance, will have their damages reduced in proportion. And if the injured party was more negligent than the prospective defendant, he or she may not collect damages.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.


A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for instance, will have their damages reduced in proportion. And if the injured party was more negligent than the prospective defendant, he or she may not collect damages.

The Plaintif

Claremore, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for instance, will have their damages reduced in proportion. And if the injured party was more negligent than the prospective defendant, he or she may not collect damages.

Plaintiff claimed to have b

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendants on medical malpractice wrongful death negligence theory.

According to the Plaintiff claimed that Cynthia Lorraie Roach, a/k/a Cindi, died after undergoing a procedure at Defendants' Plastice Surgery Center in Tulsa on May 30, 2020 as a direct result of care that fell below the standard of care.

OKlahoma City, Personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

In Oklahoma, to prove that a healthcare provider was negligent, you must show three things: There was a provider-patient relationship. The provider violated the appropriate standard of care. This violation caused an injury and created damages.

Plainti

Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with perjury

Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented a witness with perjury based on his or her preliminary hearing testimony in a criminal case .

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Williams Scotsman, Inc. operates as a space solutions. The Company provides solutions for instructional, living, health, office, storage and specialty including modular offices, and permanent modular structures.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give up their right to receive compensation for damages. Other states throughout the country have similar regulations in place regarding traffic accidents.

Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:
(1) aggravated battery; (2) misdemeanor domestic battery of Lang; and (3) misdemeanor battery of the man who stepped into their altercation.

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

According to a press release from the Buzbee Law Firm, which represented the woman who was injured, Lorelle Thompson, the jury returned a verdict that awarded Thompson $45 million in punitive damages. The previous largest verdict in Colorado Springs was $33 million in 2019.

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Second Judicial District Court, D-202-CV-22-03419, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The current diversity jurisdiction provision is codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and grants federal court jurisdiction in all ci

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice theory claiming $10 million in damages.

Utah Code section 78B-3-412 mandates that the patient provides each health care provider with 90 days' notice of the intent to file a lawsuit before an injured patient is able to file a medical malpractice suit. This notice is required to include

Sacramento, California employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on wrongful termination theories.
Zurich Insurance was founded in Switzerland in 1872. The company expanded into North America in 1912 to become a leading provider of commercial property-casualty insurance solutions and services in the U.S. and Canada. A wholly owned subsidiary of the Zurich Insurance Group, Z

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with malicious injury to property - $1,000 or more in violation of 21 O.S. 1760, which provides:



A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is guilty of:

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with:

Count as Filed: ABDGR, ASSAULT & BATTERY WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON - AUTOMOBILE, in violation of 21 O.S. 645
Date of Offense: 03/12/2023
W.L.A
Disposed: DEMURRER SUSTAINED, 09/13/2023. Dismissed by Court
Count as Disposed: ASSAULT & BATTERY WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON - AUTOMOBILE(ABDGR)
Violatio

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and Defendants in a contract dispute.


¶2 In July of 2010, homeowners contracted with the appellee, Landmark Construction Group, Inc., (Landmark) to replace a hail-damaged roof on their home in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The homeowners were also in negotiations to sell the house to the appellant, Carl Fleig (Fle

Hammond, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Porter Superior Court 2, 64D02-2212-CT-010418, and was removed to federal court by C.R. England, Inc. et al.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover

Jackson, Mississippi personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, 23-00337 and was removed to federal courts by Ronnie B. King. Jr. and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.

Mississippi has a pure comparative negligence system. This means that you can still r

Sapulpa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and Defendant in a dispute over the sale and purchase of a tract of real property located in Creek County, Oklahoma.

These four elements of a breach of contract define which party initiated the breach of contract, the manner of the breach, the scope of the breach, and the damages the breach caused. They become the backbo

Sapulpa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a contract dispute.

Plaintiff claimed that Defendant breached a consulting agreement by which it engaged Plaintiff to perform certain consulting services related to the operation of a duly licensed medical marijuana grow facility.

Defendant denied that it breached the agreement.

Defendant counterclaime

Houston, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 80th District Court of Harris County, TX, 22-13419, and was removed to federal court by Fedex.

Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if a plaintiff is found to be 50% or les

Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 126th District Court, Travis County, Texas, D-1-GN-23-000156, and was removed to federal court by The Lane Construction Corporation.

Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if

Charlotte, North Carolina insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Mecklenburg County Superior Court, 18-CVS-1254
4th Circuit, 21-02165, Fourth, 24-01316, and was removed to federal court by AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company.

Under the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade P

Greensboro, North Carolina insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Under the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, a policyholder can recover “treble damages,” three times the amount of any damages caused by the insurance company's “unfair” or “deceptive” behavior.