Washington, DC personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

§ 16–2701. Liability; damages; prior recovery as precluding action.

(a) When, by an injury done or happening within the limits of the District, the death of a person is caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of a person or corporation, and the act, neglect, or default is s

Miami, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered $2 million in damages and/or injuries.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their offic

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury car insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto insurance breach of contract theory claiming damages of $1.5 million.


604.18 INSURANCE STANDARD OF CONDUCT.
Subdivision 1.Terms.

For purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them.

(a) "Insurance policy" means a

Lincoln, Nebraska personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska, CI23-0621, and was removed to federal court by Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. et al

In Nebraska, the right to compensat

Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful death negligence theory.

A person who (1) by his negligence causes the death of a person, or (2) by willful, wanton or reckless act causes the death of a person under such circumstances that the deceased could have recovered damages for personal injuries if his death had not resulted, or (3) ope

Miami, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence insurance law theory.

In this action was to recover uninsured motorist benefits, Melquiades Blanco (“Plaintiff”) filed a two-count Complaint against Progressive Express Insurance Company (“Defendant”) for breach of contract (Count I) and violation of Fla. Stat. § 624.155

Newark, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

New Jersey is a modified comparative negligence state, which, under New Jersey law, means that the person asking for damages in a lawsuit has to be less responsible for the accident than the person who allegedly caused the accident.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

A plaintiff can recover damages if they are less than 51% at fault. If they are found to carry more than 50% of the fault, they cannot seek compensation.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury care wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for instance, will have their damages reduced in proportion. And if the injured party was more negligent than the prospective defendant, he or she may not collect damages.

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming $215,000 in damages and/or injuries.

A plaintiff injured by a defendant’s wrongful act may file a tort lawsuit to recover money from
that defendant. To name a particularly familiar example of a tort, a person who negligently
causes a vehicular

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Elbert County District Court, 2023CV30014, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give up their right to

New Haven, Connecticut personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $925,000 in damages.

Connecticut is a comparative negligence state. Under this law, it's possible to recover damages in a car accident even if you are partially at fault. To do this, you must be under 50% at fault for the accident.

Bangor, Maine personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Maine follows the principle of comparative negligence, where a plaintiff's recovery may be reduced in proportion to their degree of fault. If the injured party is found to be 50% or more at fault, they may be barred from recovering damages.

Worcester, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $212,000 in damages.

Massachusetts is a modified comparative negligence state with a 51% bar to recovery. Therefore, as long as you are less than 51% at fault for your injury, you can receive some money for your damages.

Burlington, Vermont personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on negligence theories.

Contributory negligence shall not bar recovery in an action by any plaintiff, or his or her legal representative, to recover damages for negligence resulting in death, personal injury, or property damage, if the negligence was not greater than the causal total negligence of the defendant

Montgomery, Alabama personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Alabama adopted a pure contributory negligence statute, which means a plaintiff is barred from recovering ANY damages if they're even 1 percent responsible for causing their accident. Let's look at an example of an Alabama contributory negligence auto accident: Raymond is

Waycross, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology, Orthopaedics and Spine that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes.

Savannah, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the State Court of Chatham County, STCV20-02299, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Legal Definition of Auto Negligence in Georgia - This duty of care requires drivers to obey traffic laws, keep a lookout for other vehicles, and avoid d

Penscola, Florida insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Florida‟s “bad faith” law allows an insured person or someone who has been injured by an insured person to recover damages from an insurer for failing to settle a claim in good faith when the insurer could and should have done so.

McGu

Gainesville, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of the Eight Judicial Circuit, 01-02022-CA-003107, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Florida operates under a legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence.” Under this doctrine, a driv

Jacksonville, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Fourth Judicial Circuit, Duval County, 2021-CA-001769, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.


Florida operates under a legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence.” Under this doctrine, a driver's percent

Tampa, Florida personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court, Polk County, Florida, 2023-CA-0017894, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Florida operates under a legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence.” Under this doctrine, a driver's percentage of fault will determin

Tampa, Florida insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the 12th Judicial Circuit, 2023-CA-006688, and was removed to federal court by Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest.

Florida‟s “bad faith” law allows an insured person or someone who has been injured by an insured person to recover d

Tulsa, Oklahoma pro se Plaintiff attempted to represent herself on an a bullying theory.

GREENOUGH, KELLY M: CASE COMES ON FOR NON-JURY TRIAL. WINSTON BROWN, COURT REPORTER. YOLANDA TART PLAINTIFF PRESENT APPEARS AS PRO SE. DEFENDANT EMILY BABB PRESENT, REPRESENTED BY PRESTON BENNETT.
COURT HEARD PLAINTIFFS-COUNTER DEFENDANT CASE IN CHIEF, SIX (6) WITNESSES SWORN AND TESTIMONY TAKEN.

Miami, Florida insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Florida‟s “bad faith” law allows an insured person or someone who has been injured by an insured person to recover damages from an insurer for failing to settle a claim in good faith when the insurer could and should have done so.