Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theory.

Pennsylvania follows a 51 percent comparative negligence rule, which means you can recover damages if you were less than 51 percent at fault. If you are found to carry more than 50 percent of the fault for the accident, you will be unable to seek compen

Newark, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Under New Jersey's Comparative Negligence law, an individual's fault for the accident cannot be more than the individual from whom damages are sought. Therefore, recovery of damages is permitted when each person in a 2 car accident is 50% at fault, but not if you are mor

Camden, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Under New Jersey's Comparative Negligence law, an individual's fault for the accident cannot be more than the individual from whom damages are sought. Therefore, recovery of damages is permitted when each person in a 2 car accident is 50% at fault, but not if you are more at fault tha

Trenton, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY HUNTERDON COUNTY, HNT-L000461-20, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Under New Jersey's Comparative Negligence law, an individual's fault for the accident cannot be more than

New Haven, Connecticut personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Connecticut utilizes a version known as modified comparative negligence. Under this system, the plaintiff can only recover damages if they are found to be less than 51 percent at fault for the accident and any resulting injuries.

New Haven, Connecticut insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

If an insured believes that his insurance company acted in bad faith, he can file a complaint with the Insurance Department. He can also file a civil lawsuit alleging a breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing or tortious bad faith.

If a court

Providence, Rhode Island personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

"Rhode Island is a "fault" state, which means that the at-fault driver is responsible for the damages and injuries caused in a car accident. To determine liability, the following three factors are considered: 1. Negligence: Negligence refers to a person's failure to

Providence, Rhode Island insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

§ 9-1-33. Insurer’s bad faith refusal to pay a claim made under any insurance policy.

(a) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, an insured under any insurance policy as set out in the general laws or otherwise may bring an action against the i

Bangor, Maine personal Injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence wrongful death theory individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Christopher Allen.

§2-807. Actions for wrongful death

1. Liability notwithstanding death. Whenever the death of a person is caused by a wrongful act, neglect or default, and the act, neglect or default

Portland, Maine insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Cumberland County Superior Court, CV-21-00079 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

§2436-A. Unfair claims settlement practices

1. Civil actions. A person injured by any of the following actions taken by th

Burlington, Vermont personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on premises liability negligence theories.

Plaintiff Richard Grajeda brings this negligence action against Vail Resorts Inc., Vail Resorts Management Company, and Okemo Limited Liability Company (collectively, “Defendants”), seeking damages for injuries he sustained in a collision with a snowmaking station

Burlington, Vermont personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

The elements of a personal injury auto negligence claimed are a duty of due care, breach of that duty that directly causes the injuries and damages suffered by the Plaintiff.

Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Middlesex Superior Court, 1981CV01345 and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Under Massachusetts' comparative negligence doctrine, the award for damages the plaintiff may receive is reduced based on his/her degree of

Boston, Massachusetts personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.


Under Massachusetts' comparative negligence doctrine, the award for damages the plaintiff may receive is reduced based on his/her degree of fault. A plaintiff can recover damages for his/her injuries if he/she is less than 51% at fault for the accident.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced based on their as

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.

This case was filed in the 17th Judicial Circuit, CACE-23-012481, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Florida‟s “bad faith” law allows an insured person or someone who has been injured by an insured person to recover damages

Fort Lauderdale, Florida insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.

Florida‟s “bad faith” law allows an insured person or someone who has been injured by an insured person to recover damages from an insurer for failing to settle a claim in good faith when the insurer could and should have done so.

Miami, Florida insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Florida‟s “bad faith” law allows an insured person or someone who has been injured by an insured person to recover damages from an insurer for failing to settle a claim in good faith when the insurer could and should have done so.

Fort Pierce, Florida insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

Florida‟s “bad faith” law allows an insured person or someone who has been injured by an insured person to recover damages from an insurer for failing to settle a claim in good faith when the insurer could and should have done so.

Pocatello, Idaho personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability is almost always controlled by the law of negligence, and it's usually seen in the context of injuries resulting from dangerous conditions on property that aren't remedied or warned of. The owner or occupier who controls property owes a du

Great Falls, Montana personal injury law truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on auto negligence theories.

Montana negligence laws follow the doctrine of modified comparative negligence. This means that a plaintiff can't be more than 51 percent negligent or responsible for the injury, or they will be barred from recovery.

The elements on a personal injury claim are duty

Reno, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

The elements of a Nevada auto negligence claim are negligence, causation, and damages.

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

The elements of an auto negligence claim are duty of care, negligence, causation, and damages.

Negligence is the failure to comply with the applicable standard of care: the requisite standard of conduct objective.

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.


Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

The elements of a Federal Tort C

Denver, Colorado insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

This case was filed in the Denver County District Court, 2022CV32050, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Under Colorado bad faith law, if an insurance carrier does indeed act unreasonably, the insured may be entitled to three times the