Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

Under Arkansas statute, damages are awarded in proportion to the plaintiff's contributions to their own injuries. But if the plaintiff is at least as responsible for the injuries as the defendant, they may not recover any damages.

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theories.

Under Arkansas statute, damages are awarded in proportion to the plaintiff's contributions to their own injuries. But if the plaintiff is at least as responsible for the injuries as the defendant, they may not recover any damages.

Jonesboro, Arkansas personal injury truck wrecks lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theory.

Under Arkansas statute, damages are awarded in proportion to the plaintiff's contributions to their own injuries. But if the plaintiff is at least as responsible for the injuries as the defendant, they may not recover any damages.

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Employer's Liability theory.

The Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), codified at 45 U.S.C.S. § 51-60, governs the right of railroad employees injured, sickened or killed in the course of their employment through an employer's negligence to sue the employer for damages.

Peoria, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damag

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Defendants who were sued on auto negligence theories.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.

Chicago, Illinois employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Family and Medical Leave Act violation theory.

Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 - Title I: General Requirements for Leave - Establishes certain requirements for unpaid family and medical leave for permanent employees.

(Sec. 101) Makes employees eligible for such leave if they have b

Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois, 23-LA-674 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Illinois auto negligence law governs how liability and damages are determined in car accidents. Here's a breakdown of its k

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

Cook Medical is facing IVC filter lawsuits citing wrongful injuries. Courts have found in favor of multiple plaintiffs in bellwether trials.

Indiana product liability law can hold manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of a defective product accountable

Evansville, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a products liability theory.

Indiana Product Liability Law:

Indiana product liability law can hold manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of a defective product accountable for injuries caused by that product. Here's a breakdown of its key aspects:

Types of Claims:

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a personal injury premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the Marion County Superior Court 6, 49D06-2209-CT-032977, and was removed to federal court by Wal-Mart.

Premises liability law in Indiana protects individuals from injuries sustained on another person's

New Albany, Indiana personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Clark Superior Court #6, 10D06-2301-CT-000008, and was removed to federal court by Target.

Indiana Premises Liability Law:

Premises liability law in Indiana protects individuals from injuries susta

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Marion County Superior Court, 49D05-2202-CT-00407, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Indiana personal injury negligence law:

Elements of a Negligence Claim:

To successfully file a pers

Indianapolis, Indiana insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

zIn Indiana, bad faith breach of insurance contract law revolves around the insurer's failure to fulfill their obligations under the contract in good faith. This can manifest in various ways, impacting the insured's ability to receive rightful cov

Knoxville, Tennessee consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violation theory.

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is a federal law enacted in 1991 to protect consumers from unwanted telemarketing calls, automated calls, and text messages. Here's a breakdown of its key aspects:

What the TCPA Prohi

Greeneville, Tennessee consumer lawyer lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violation theory.

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is a federal law enacted in 1991 to protect consumers from unwanted telemarketing calls, automated calls, and text messages. Here's a breakdown of its key aspects:

What the TCPA

Winchester, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42:1983 Civil Rights Act violation theory.


Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code is a crucial piece of American civil rights legislation known as the Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights. It grants citizens the right to sue state and local government officials for violati

Chattanooga, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability negligence theory.

Tennessee Product Liability Law

Duty of care: Manufacturers and sellers in Tennessee have a legal duty to provide products that are safe for their intended use and free from defects. This includes:

Designing and manufacturing produc

Winchester, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

Navigating Tennessee Medical Malpractice Law

Understanding Tennessee medical malpractice law can be crucial if you've been injured due to alleged negligence by a healthcare provider. Here's a breakdown of the key aspects to help you assess your

Knoxville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory.

Navigating Tennessee Medical Malpractice Law

Understanding Tennessee medical malpractice law can be crucial if you've been injured due to alleged negligence by a healthcare provider. Here's a breakdown of the key aspects

Greeneville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

Navigating Tennessee Medical Malpractice Law

Understanding Tennessee medical malpractice law can be crucial if you've been injured due to alleged negligence by a healthcare provider. Here's a breakdown of the key aspects to help you assess you

Winchester, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractive negligence theory.

Navigating Tennessee Medical Malpractice Law

Understanding Tennessee medical malpractice law can be crucial if you've been injured due to alleged negligence by a healthcare provider. Here's a breakdown of the key aspects to help you assess your

Knoxville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Knox County Circuit Court, 1-283-22, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Tennessee premises liability law governs when a property owner or occupier can be held responsible for injuries that occur on their

Memphis, Tennessee real property law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory.

Hohenberg and Hanson owned homes in Memphis, Tennessee. They did not maintain them. Hohenberg failed to make repairs after a tree struck her roof. Hanson let the grass, weeds, and other plants grow wild and allowedtrash, debris, and personal prop

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

This case was filed in the Tulsa Cty Dist Ct, CJ-20-03184, and was removed to federal court by Stryker Orthopaedics.

Stryker Orthopaedics is focused on anticipating your needs for innovative products and services that help us create the
...

Key aspe