Portland, Oregon personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the County of Multnomah, 21CV31232, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Oregon Auto Negligence Law Overview:

Oregon law refers to the l

Sacramento, California consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued
the Defendant on a Magnuson -Moss Warranty Act violation theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is a federal law that regulates consumer product warranties in the United States. Here's a breakdown of its key elements:

Purpose:

To e

Eureka, California personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Federal Torts Claims Act auto negligence negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $1.2 billion in damages and/or injuries.

Los Angeles, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, 23LBCV01487, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Defendant filed a motion to remand the case to the Superior Court

Los Angeles, California personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto nglgience negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Los Angeles, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a result of

Los Angeles, Calofornia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on atuo negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles, 23AHCV02101, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Santa Ana, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Riverside, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.


This case was filed in the County of Riverside, CVPS2303499, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Plaintiff filed a motion to remand.

Riverside, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, CIVSB2223434, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff's car was hit from behind while she was stopped on South Memorial Drived on January 8, 2023.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle which was driven by Defendant Lollis who made a left turn and his car was struck by an oncoming vehicle resulting in Plaintiff being injured.

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation law lawyer represented the Defendants who were sued by the Plaintiff on an eminent domain law theory seeking to acquire by the exercise of eminent domain certain rights, title and interest o real property owned by the Defendants for public use.

The Commissioners appointed by the Court assessed the damages caused as a direct result of the taking at $19,500.00.<

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on premises liablity negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

On December 23, 2020, Plaintiff was a business invitee at Chic Fil A's restaurant on South Memorial in Tulsa, Oklahoma when she tripped over an extension cord that was used for the Christma

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Governmental Torts Claims Act auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on on an intentioal infliction of emotional distress theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case arose out of unconscionable and concerted acts taken by certain Chiefs in the Tulsa Fire Department against veteran firefighter Capital Nicolas Gillespie. Gill

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on am auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

On or about July 23, 202, Defendant Antonio Martinez ws driving a 1996 Honda Accord south on Highway 169 near East 21st Street in Tulsa. Defendant was in the middle southbound lane. Plaintif

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on premises liability negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

On or about the 5th day of Mrch 2020, Plaintiff was very seriously injured while a business invitee of Defendants Law Americas Supermerado #3. Plaintiff fell while entering the store.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff claimed that she was invited to Defendants' residence for a gathering on July 19, 2017. While leaving the event she fall and was injured as a result of a defective and dangerous condition that the

Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance law lawyesr represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

"Understanding Oklahoma bad faith breach of insurance contract law can be crucial if you feel your insurance company has wrongly denied or delayed your claim. Here's a breakdown

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Auto Negligence:

Duty of care: Every person in Oklahoma has a duty to act with reasonable care in any situation where their actions could

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff underwent surgery at Saint Francis Hospital on September 24,2018 by Dr. Candice Meyer. The surgery, as scheduled and consented to by the Plaintiff was a laproscopic procedure w

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Oklahoma Premises Liability Law:

Duty of Care:

Landowners owe different levels of care to different types of visitors:
Invitees (e.g., social guests, customers): Highest dut

Stillwater, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Auto Negligence:

Duty of care: Every person in Oklahoma has a duty to act with reasonable care in any situation where their actions could potentially harm others. T