Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory claiming $94,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, C-02-CV-23-000668, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Dave & Buster's Grand Sports Cafe in a restaurant and entertainment business headquar

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an admiralty law theory under 28 U.S.C. 1333, which provides:

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
(1) Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are other

Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copy right infringement theory.

Strike 3 Holdings is a company that owns the copyright on some pornographic films. They produce adult films under the brand names Slayed,...

"Copyright infringement law is a body of law that protects the original works of authors, including lite

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Prince George's County, Maryland, C16CV22001268, and was removed to federal court the Defendant.

"Maryland premises liability law is based on the principle that property owners have a duty to keep their

Boston, Massachusetts civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Federal Trade Commission Act under 15 U.S.C. 45 for damages from a Customer Data Security Breach.

Boston, Massachusetts civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on breach of contract theories claiming $58,000 in damages.

This case was filed in the Superior Court, County of Plymouth, 2383CV00104, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Boise, Idaho civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming $9.999 million in damages

New York, New York employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Labor Standards Act prohibited act violations.

"Section 215(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) prohibits employers from engaging in any of the following prohibited acts:

(a) To violate any provision of section 206 or section 207 of this title, or any order or regulation ma

New York, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an employment discrimination theory.

"Employment discrimination law is a body of law that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of certain protected characteristics. Protected characteristics can vary by jurisdiction, but some common examples include race, color, re

New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyrights infringement law.

"Copyright infringement law is a body of law that protects the original works of authors, including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, as well as motion pictures, sound recordings, and architectural works. Copyright infringement occurs when a co

New York, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a 42:12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination theory.

"42 U.S.C. § 12132 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including employment, education, transportation, government services, and c

New YOrk, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

"New York premises liability negligence law is based on the principle that property owners have a duty to keep their premises safe for visitors. This duty applies to both business and residential property owners.

To establish a premises liability negligence claim in

New York, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant 42:2000e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices) law theory.

"42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e) is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This law applies to all employers, including private employers, state and local g

White Plains, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on nn employment discrimination theory.

"Employment discrimination law is a body of law that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of certain protected characteristics. Protected characteristics can vary by jurisdiction, but some common examples include race, color,

White Plaintiff, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42:2000e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices) legal theories.

"42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e) is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This law applies to all employers, including private employers, s

White Plaintiffs, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination theory.

"The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including employment. Under the ADA, an employer cannot discrimi

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

"New York product liability law is based on a combination of negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty theories.

Negligence

To establish a negligence claim against a product manufacturer, a plaintiff must prove the following elements

New York City, New York employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants Fair Labor Standards Act violations Theories.

Plaintiff Graham Chase Robinson initiated this action on October 3, 2019 by filing a complaint against Canal Productions, Inc. and Robert De Niro, asserting various claims, including claims for gender discrimination and retaliation under federal a

San Diego, California consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory.

"The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that protects consumers from abusive debt collection practices. The FDCPA applies to all debt collectors, including collection agencies, creditors, and lawyers who collect debts on be

Honolulu, Hawaii insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

"In Hawaii, a bad faith breach of insurance contract claim can be brought against an insurance company when the company acts in a way that is inconsistent with its duty of good faith and fair dealing under the insurance contract.

To establish

Springfield, Missouri civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a American with Disabilities Act violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 12101.

"The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination" against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including employment, education, transportation, government s

St. Louis, Missouri immigration lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants seeking a writ of mandamus to adjudicate a visa petition.

"A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary writ issued by a court to compel a government official or agency to perform a duty that is owed to the petitioner. In the context of immigration law, a writ of mandamus can be used to compel U.S. Citizens

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"Arkansas follows a pure contributory negligence standard for auto accidents. This means that a plaintiff cannot recover damages if they are found to be any percentage at fault for the accident.

Here are some of the key provisions of Arka

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"Oklahoma follows a modified comparative negligence standard for auto accidents. This means that a plaintiff's damages may be reduced by the percentage of fault they are assigned for the accident. However, a plaintiff can still recover damages even if they a

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of the design, manufacture and/or sale of unreasonably dangerous product.


"Torax® Medical, Inc. is a privately held medical device company headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, that develops and