Springfield, Missouri personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

This case was initially filed in the 25th Judicial Circuit, Phelps County, 21PU-CV00881

The

Owensboro, Kentucky personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident that they claimed was caused by Tyron's driver.

The elements of a personal injury claim in Kentucky are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant

Cincinnati, Ohio personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Cellent Global Logistics' driver.

This case was initially filed in the Butler County Court Ohio of Common Pleas, CV 2021 07 0916, and was r

San Diego, California personal jury lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.

The elements of a premises liability claim in California are:

The Defendant owned, occupied, leased, or controlled the premises;
The D

San Diego, California insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of the breach.

This case was initially filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, 37-02018-00010745-CU-BT-CTL, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

San Diego, California personal injury car wreck lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee. Plaintiff claimed to have suffered $5 million in damages and/or injuries.

A plaintiff suing the federal government under the F

San Diego, California personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a general negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the Defendant failing to exercise due care.

A plaintiff must prove the following elements to provide a personal injury claim in California:

The defendant owed the pla

New Haven, Connecticut criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with participating in a bid rigging scheme targeting public and private entities in Connecticut.


Axion Speciality Contracting, LLC conspired with other insulation contractor to to rig bids on contracts for installing insulation around pipes and ducts on construction projects at universities, hospitals and other

Montgomery, Alabama plaintiff personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued on a medical malpractice negligence theory claiming that her baby Jaquarius Smith died shortly after birth because of substandard care provide by the hospital staff.

The child died 14 days after he was born after multiple trips to the hospital from Hirschsprung's Disease which can be cured surgically in

Escanaba, Michigan personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.


The elements of a personal injury claim in Michigan are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant

New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

The elements of a personal injury claim in Louisana are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant

Baton Rouge, Louisiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.


The elements of a personal injury claim in Louisian are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defend

Marshall, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

This case was initially filed in the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas, 21-00794, and was remo

Shreveport, Louisiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident. caused by Defendant Junior Thomas.

This case was initially filed in the 1st Judicial District Court, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, case number 635

Brownsville, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims ACt auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages in a motor vehicle accident caused by a government employee.

Austin, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

The elements of a personal injury case in Texas are:

Negligence (failure of exercise due care for th

San Antonio, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

This case was initially filed in the 407th District Court, Bexar County, Texas, 2021CI03129, and was r

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

This case was initially filed in the 91st Judicial District Court, Eastland County, TX, CV2246281, and

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory
claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.

This case was initially filed in the County Court at Law No 1 of Dallas County, TX, CC-22-03748-A, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

Charleston, South Carolina insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas, Charleston, South Carolina, case number CP-10-01654, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

The Four Elements of a Breach of Contract Claim

There was a valid contract;
Plaintiff has

Greensboro, North Carolina insurance law lawyer represented plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court, Guilford County, North Carolina, case number 22 CVS 6310, and was removed federal court by the Defendants.

The Four Elements of a Breach of Contract Claim

There was a valid contract;
Plaintiff per

Raleigh, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory
claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.

This case was filed in the Superior Court, Wake County, North Carolina, case number 21-CVS-3623, and removed to federal court by Defendant.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence and underinsured motorist insurance law theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant's failure to exercise due care in the operation of his vehicle.

The accident in question occur

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

How do I Prove Negligence in a Maryland Personal Injury Case?

DUTY. ...
BREACH. ...
CAUSATION. ...
DAMAGES.

Norfolk, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory
claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

To succeed in a negligence claim, a plaintiff must be able to establish four elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. The “duty” element is easily met in