Jocelyn Martin v. Afsata Jereline Simpson |
Baltimore, Maryland personal injury car wreck lawyer presented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $500,000 in damages and/or injures as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident. |
Tarita Latrelle Gaines and James A. Gaines v. Target Corporation |
Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores. |
Albert J. Hanson v. G & G Motorcycles, Inc. d/b/a Harley-Davidson |
Richmond, Virginia personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $250,000 in damages and/or injuries caused by one of Defendant's drivers. |
Elena Bailey v. Kroger Limited Partnership |
Roanoke, Virginia personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $100,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant. |
John M. Griswold v. Gregory Morris, Susie Morris and Expedia, Inc. |
Martinsburg, West Virginia personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident that Plaintiff claimed was caused by Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation in his vehicle. |
Matheus Plazzi, et al. v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. |
Boston, Massachusetts employment law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on Wage and Hour Act violation theories. |
Duane Andrew Fuoss v. United States of America |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 2671) auto negligence theory claiming that an employee of the United States government employee's negligence in operating a motor vehicle. |
Ana L. Frank v. Edward J. Smith and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. |
Eire, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have sustained $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant. |
Michael R. Dehaas and Ruth A. Dehaas v. Nuradyl Satybaldieve, Euro Kam, Ltd., and WTA Global, Inc. |
Johnstown, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Jamey Fuller v. Frederick Tagtmeier v. Jamey Fuller |
Wichita, Kansas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident. |
United States of America v. Sutter Health |
San Francisco, California civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant charged with violating the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, which provides: |
Samantha Edwards v. Eric James Cornell Thomas and McElroy Truck Lines, Inc. |
Texarkana, Arkansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Sylvester Smith v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC |
Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Megan Bird v. Joshua D. Williams and Western Transport, LLC |
Rapid City, South Dakota personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Robert A. DeSimone v. Ronald R. Endres and T & C Service Center, Inc. |
Omaha, Nebraska personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
David Janiashvili v. Artudianti, Inc., et al. |
Spokane, Washington personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries. |
Jeffery Bray and Michelle Bray v. Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections, et. al. |
Boise, Idaho personal injury wrongful death lawyer represented Plaintiff's who sued Defendants on negligence theories claiming more than $75,000 in damages and/or injures as a direct result of the death of Colby James Bray, deceased. |
Danny Pedersen, et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
Great Falls, Montana personal injury insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory. |
Pamela Patnode v. Menard, Inc. |
Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a general negligence theory claiming to have suffered $50,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a failure to exercise due care. |
Donna Dawley v. Meta Platforms, Inc. |
Milwaukee, Wisconsin personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on product liability theories claimed to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of having designed, manufactured and sold a defective and unreasonably dangerous product. |
United States ex rel. GNGH 2, Inc. v. Birdsall Voss & Associates, Inc. |
Milwaukee, Wisconsin civil litigation lawyer represented Defendant accused of violation the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, which provides: |
George Kosianiuk v. Sadek Alzokart and Zokar Logistics, Inc. |
Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Lauressa Perez, et al. v. Richard A. Reitz, II and Brink Farms, Inc. |
South Bend, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on wrongful death auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Laurance Moon and Maurice Watts v. Fatkhuddin Kurbonov and BSL Express Trucking, Inc. |
Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Yvonne I Underhill and Ronnie Underhill v. Robert Neal Williams and Melissa Williams |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of Defendants' failure to exercise due case in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Next Page |