Tacoma, Washington personal injury wrongful death lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories claiming that Tacoma Police Officers Christopher Burbank, Matthew Collins and Masyth Ford used excessive force when they attempted to arrest him in 2021.

The Complaint:

Plaintiffs, MONET CARTER-MIXON as Personal Representative of the ESTAT

Wilmington, Delaware civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory claiming to have suffered $106,000 in damages.

"
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Building a Level Playing Field

The ADA is a landmark civil rights law in the United States that prohibits discrimination against individuals

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, 230800142, and was removed to federal co

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered less than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result on the negligence operation of a motor vehicle.

Plaintiff sought remand to the Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.

"Pennsylvania auto

Scranton, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the negligence of the Defendants.

"Pennsylvania auto negligence law operates under a modified comparative negligence system, which means that both parties involved

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a result of their negligence.

"Pennsylvania auto negligence law operates under a modified comparative negligence system, which means that both parties involved in an accident can be

Newark, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Superior Court, Essex County, ESX-L-002553-21, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

New Jersey auto negligence law follows a comparative negligence system, meaning that both parties involved in an accident c

Newark, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

New Jersey auto negligence law follows a comparative negligence system, meaning that both parties involved in an accident can be partly responsible for the damages. Here are some key points to understand:

Duty of Care:

Every driver has

Camden, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

New Jersey auto negligence law follows a comparative negligence system, meaning that both parties involved in an accident can be partly responsible for the damages. Here are some key points to understand:

Duty of Care:

Every driver has

Camden, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto neglgience theories.

New Jersey auto negligence law follows a comparative negligence system, meaning that both parties involved in an accident can be partly responsible for the damages. Here are some key points to understand:

Duty of Care:

Every driver has

Camden, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"New Jersey auto negligence law follows a comparative negligence system, meaning that both parties involved in an accident can be partly responsible for the damages. Here are some key points to understand:

Duty of Care:

Every driver ha

Tenton, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"New Jersey auto negligence law follows a comparative negligence system, meaning that both parties involved in an accident can be partly responsible for the damages. Here are some key points to understand:

Duty of Care:

Every driver has

Charleston, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"West Virginia auto negligence law, like in most states, revolves around the concept of negligence - essentially, the failure to act with the reasonable care that a person in similar circumstances would exercise. In the context of car accidents, it r

New York City, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a federal tort claims act auto negligence theory.

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is a United States law that waives the sovereign immunity of the United States government in certain cases, allowing individuals to sue the government for torts (civil wrongs) committed by its employees act

White Plains, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory un 28 U.S.C. 2401.

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is a United States law that waives the sovereign immunity of the United States government in certain cases, allowing individuals to sue the government for torts (civil wrongs) committed by i

Richland, Washington employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Family Medical Leave Act violation theory.


R.W., a nursing student at Columbia Basin College, revealed to his doctor that he had homicidal ideations and that he imagined killing his teachers. Upon learning this information from the doctor and conducting further investigation, the Colle

Detroit, Michigan employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Family and Medical Leave Act violation theory.

"The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is a federal law in the United States that entitles eligible employees to take unpaid, job-protected leave for certain family and medical reasons. Here's a breakdown of the key points:

Eligibility:

Grand Rapids, Michigan social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking review of the denial by HHS of his application for Social Security: SSID Title XVI benefits.

"SSI stands for Supplemental Security Income. It is a federal program in the United States that provides monthly payments to people with limited income and resources who are either:

Washington, DC personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on negligence theories.

Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982), Presidents have carried out their official responsibilities free from any exposure to civil damages liability. Nixon established a President’s absolute immunity from civil damages claims predica

Knoxville, Tennessee civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on an Americans With Disabilities Act violation theory.

"The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all aspects of public life. The ADA applies to employers, state and local governments, public accommodations

Raleigh, North Carolina civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Americans with Disabilities Act violation theories.

Grifols is a leading global healthcare company that develops plasma-derived medicines and other innovative biopharmaceutical solutions that enable millions ...

"Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimi

Roanoke, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiring with others to use, in the course of dispensing and distributing controlled substances, a DEA registration number issued to another person. DEA registration numbers are unique identifiers issued to medical providers in order to track who issues drug prescriptions and to ensure only qualified providers pres

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania civil litigation, Lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant Family Medical Leave Act violation theory.


Plaintiff Rodriquez suffers from severe migraines with auras. SEPTA SUMF He began working for Defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) in 2015. After prior attendance issues, Rodriquez accumulated two negat

New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories claiming he was wrongful charged and convicted for a murder he did not commit.

1. Plaintiff Anthony Johnson was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced
to life without parole in 1986 for a crime that he did not commit. After more than 20 years in

San Diego, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with committing fraud to obtain almost $3 million intended to help those affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

In his plea agreement, Thomas Zolezzi of San Diego, admitted he submitted five loan applications containing false statements to trick lenders into providing the relief funds. He used the borrowed funds