Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of merchandise from a retainler in violation of 21 O.S. 1731, which provides:

A. Larceny of merchandise held for sale in retail or wholesale establishments shall be punishable as follows:

1. For the first or second conviction, in the event the value of the goods, edible meat, or other corporea

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery in violation of 21 O.S. 644(c), which provides:

C. Any person who commits any assault and battery against a current or former intimate partner or a family or household member as defined by Section 60.1 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes shall be guilty of domestic abuse. Upon con

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful possession of controlled drugs in violation of 63 O.S. 2-420, which provides:

A. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to possess a controlled dangerous substance unless such substance was obtained directly, or pursuant to a valid prescription or order from a practitioner,

Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with illegal reentry.

Title 8 U. S. C. § 1326(a) makes it a crime for a deported alien to return to the United States without special permission and authorizes a maximum prison term of two years. In 1988, Congress added subsection (b)(2), which authorizes a maximum prison term of 20 years for "any alien described"

New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Drug and Firearm Charges
New Orleans Man Sentenced to Drug and Firearm Charges

New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Federal Gun and and Drug Charges
New Orleans Man Sentenced for Federal Gun and and Drug Charges

Alexandria, Virginia civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful termination theory.

Barnett, a former registered nurse and employee of INOVA, refused to receive
the COVID-19 vaccine as required under INOVA’s policy because of its alleged conflict
with her religious belief. INOVA discharged her, and Barnett filed a Title VII religious
discrimina

Colorado Springs, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murder.


At trial, the People presented evidence from which the jury
could find the following facts. Gabe Garcia and the victim had been
“inseparable” ever since they met and became best friends in
school. “If I needed something,” he testified, “she

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Kent Morlan represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery in violation of 21 O.S. 644(C), which provides:

C. Any person who commits any assault and battery against a current or former intimate partner or a family or household member as defined by Section 60.1 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes shall be guilty of domestic abus

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with public intoxication in violation of 37 O.S. 8-101(D) and resisting arrest in violation of 21 O.S. 268.

37A O.S. 6-101(D) provides:

A. No person shall:

1. Knowingly sell, deliver or furnish alcoholic beverages to any person under twenty-one (21) years of age;

2. Sell, deliver or kn

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2), which provides:

A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, streets, turn

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Nathan Miller represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury to property less than $1,000 in violation of f 21 O.S. 1760(A)(1), which provides:

A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is gu

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unauthorized use of a credit/dbit care in violation of 21 O.S. 1660.29, which provides:

A person who, with intent to defraud (a) the issuer, (b) a person or organization providing money, goods, services or anything else of value, or (c) any other person, uses for the purpose of obtaining money, goods, services

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: LMFR, LARCENY OF MERCHANDISE FROM RETAILER, in violation of 21 O.S. 1731
Date of Offense: 08/23/2023
PANNEBAKER, JONATHON WAYNE
Disposed: DEFERRED, 01/07/2025. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: LARCENY OF MERCHANDISE FROM RETAILER(LMFR)
Violation of 21 O.S. 1

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a stolen vehicle in violation of 47 O.S. 4-103, which provides:




A. A person not entitled to the possession of a vehicle who receives, possesses, conceals, sells, or disposes of it, knowing the vehicle to be stolen or converted under circumstances constituting a crime shall, upon co

Hastings, Minnesota civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a real property dispute.

The Sawyers and the Boland Trustees dispute ownership of an 8.5' by 117' strip of land on the east side of the Boland Trustees' property and the west side of the Sawyers' property (the Adverse Possession Parcel).

In 1966, the Boland family acquired property on Lake Marion (the Bolan

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, 2nd office, in violation of 47 O.S. 902, which provides:


A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, stree

Flemingsburg, Kentucky real property lawyers represented the parties in am adverse possession dispute.

The Wilkersons purchased property at 600 Helphenstine Road in Wallingford, Kentucky. The Wilkersons hired others to maintain the property (mowing and cutting hay) until they took up residence there in 2016.

The Babers live on an adjacent tract of one and one-half acres

Cincinnati, Ohio civil litigation lawyers represented the parties challenging net neutrality policies adopted by the FCC.

As Congress has said, the Internet has “flourished, to the benefit of all Americans, with a
minimum of government regulation.” 47 U.S.C. § 230(a)(4). The Federal Communications
Commission largely followed this command from the Telecommunications

Peoria, IL criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit armed robbery and multiple robbery and firearms charges
Two Quad Cities Men Sentenced for Multiple Armed Robbery and Firearm Charges

Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with
Three Members of Violent National Gang Sentenced

Washington, DC criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Tax Evasion and Forcibly Retaking Property Seized Under Court Order
Former Utah Movie Producer Sentenced for Tax Evasion and Forcibly Retaking Property Seized Under Court Order

Tulsa, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

1. The phrase 'actual resident' and the word 'resident' as used in Title 12 O.S.1951, § 1272, as amended, contemplate an actual residence with substantially the same attributes as are intended when the word 'domicile' is used.

2. In determining a person's intentions as to his domicile, his acts and conduc