Jeffrey Kremers v. James M. Dahl |
In this contract-for-deed resort-property dispute, the sellers seek to cancel the contract after the buyers failed to make their final balloon payment, and the buyers seek a |
Double Knobs Mountain Ranch, Inc. |
College of the Mainland appeals from an order denying its plea to the jurisdiction seeking dismissal of a retaliatory discharge suit filed under Chapter 554 of the Texas Government Code by former employee Douglas Meneke. We reverse the trial court’s order and render judgment that this suit must be dismissed because Meneke’s claim is barred by governmental immunity and the trial court therefore $0 (01-23-2014 - TX) |
Edward Nwokedi and 1002 Gemini Interests, LLC v. Unlimited Restoration Specialists, Inc. |
Appellants Edward Nwokedi and 1002 Gemini Interests, LLC appeal a judgment entered against them in favor of appellee Unlimited Restoration Specialists, Inc., trading as Unlimited Restoration, Inc. (URI), a company that provided restoration services to Gemini’s property after it was damaged during |
Denis Dailey v. City of San Diego |
Plaintiff Denise Dailey (Dailey) asserts the court erred in granting the City of San Diego's (City's) motion for summary judgment on her first cause of action for declaratory relief. In that cause of action Dailey alleged that the City improperly capped her retiree |
Fujifilm Corporation v. Cindy Yang |
Cindy Yang appeals from the judgment for Fujifilm Corporation (Fuji). According to Yang, Fuji split its cause of action against her. She contends Fuji could have pursued its claims for fraudulent transfers against her in a prior federal court proceeding, and therefore the trial court should have applied res judicata and claim preclusion to bar those claims here. We find that the trial court correc $0 (01-24-2014 - CA) |
State of Oklahoma v. Troy A. Methvin |
The State of Oklahoma charged Troy A. Methvin with: |
State of Oklahoma v. Christopher Hanson |
The State of Oklahoma charged Christopher Hanson with: |
State of Oklahoma v. David Douglas Bender, Patrick James Hansen a/k/a Lance Brown |
The State of Oklahoma charged David Douglas Bender, Patrick James Hansen a/k/a Lance Brown with: |
Adam Cate v. City of Burlington |
¶ 1. ROBINSON, J. Plaintiff filed suit for breach of contract and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) against his former employer, the City of Burlington, claiming that the City disciplined him for actions and in a manner not authorized by the City’s personnel manual. The trial court granted the City summary judgment, concluding that the manual unambiguously allow $0 (08-02-2013 - VT) |
Jamie Clarke v. Joseph Abate, M.D. |
¶ 1. REIBER, C.J. In this civil action alleging sexual assault and battery and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress by a medical doctor during the course of his treatment of a high school female athlete, plaintiff appeals the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant based on the six-year statute of limitations applicable to childhood sexual abuse $0 (08-09-2013 - VT) |
Thomas Kellogg v. Cindy Shushereba |
¶ 1. DOOLEY, J. This case presents the difficult task of equitably resolving the fallout from a collapsed, unwritten real estate transaction. Both parties challenge the monetary award arrived at by the trial court, sitting in equity. We conclude that, although correct in some respects, the trial court’s decision mistakenly treated the parties’ agreement as though it were an ag $0 (09-06-2013 - VT) |
Doreen Carpentier v. Douglas Tuthill and Town of Hartford Town Clerk |
¶ 1. BURGESS, J. Defendant Douglas Tuthill, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Oakes, appeals from the jury’s award of $150,000 in punitive damages to plaintiff Doreen Carpentier and the trial court’s denial of his motion for remittitur. Defendant also challenges the trial court’s denial of his post-judgment motion to vacate a writ of attachment. We affirm. |
In Re: Late Fee and Over-Limit Fee Liitgattion - Andrew W. Pinon v. Bank of America, N.A. |
Suppose you have an ordinary consumer credit card. You are committed to fiscal rectitude, so you pay your balance in full on the due date each month and never exceed your credit limit. One particularly busy month, though, you lose track of how much you have spent and you charge a purchase that pushes your balance a few dollars beyond your credit limit. You compound the problem when you make your m $0 (01-21-2014 - CA) |
Steven Smothers v. Solvay Chemicals, Inc. |
Steven Smothers worked for Solvay Chemical, Inc. (“Solvay”) for 18 years until Solvay fired him, ostensibly because of a first-time safety violation and a dispute with a |
Wilmington Trust Company v. Karen Anne Sullivan-Thorne |
[¶1] Wilmington Trust Company (“Wilmington”) appeals from a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Lewiston, Lawrence, J.) in favor of Karen Anne Sullivan-Thorne on Wilmington’s complaint seeking a judgment of foreclosure. Wilmington argues that the District Court erred in concluding that Wilmington’s foreclosure action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata based on prior li $0 (11-05-2013 - ME) |
State of Oklahoma v. Cody Matthew Snodgrass |
The State of Oklahoma charged Cody Matthew Snodgrass with: |
William Clark Spray v. Sears Holdings Corporation, K Mart Corporation and Enid OK Retail, LLC |
William Clark Spray sued Sears Holdings Corporation, K Mart Corporation and Enid OK Retail, LLC on a premises liability theory claiming: |
State of Oklahoma v. William David Miske |
The State of Oklahoma charged William David Miske with: |
In the Estate of Consuella Perkins Ulbrich, Deceased |
On September 18, 2013, we issued an opinion affirming the probate court’s judgment in part, reversing the probate court’s judgment in part, and remanding the cause to the probate court. See Estate of Ulbrich, No. 04-12-00514-CV, 2013 WL 5297161 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 18, 2013). Appellant then filed a motion for rehearing. After requesting a response, we grant appellant’s motion for r $0 (01-17-2014 - TX) |
James Bradley Morrison v. James Campbell |
In this agreed interlocutory appeal, James Bradley Morrison appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment on the claim for loss of use damages brought against him by James Campbell.1 Morrison’s vehicle 1Because this lawsuit was filed before September 1, 2011, the former civil practice and remedies code section 51.014 applies to this case rather than the amended rule; $0 (01-17-2014 - TX) |
Willis Floyd Wiley v. American Zurich Insurance Company |
Appellant Willis Floyd Wiley appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his claims against Appellee American Zurich Insurance Company. We affirm. |
Raquel Pascoal Wiliams v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
Raquel Pascoal Williams appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The District Court interpreted parts of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to prevent Ms. Pascoal from adjusting her immigration status to become a legal permanent resident. Her appeal raises a novel issue of statutory interpretation: whether the remar $0 (01-17-2014 - FL) |
State of Oklahoma v. Ryan Scott Levin |
Tulsa criminal defense lawyer Jerry Turster represented Ryan Scott Levin who was charged with: |
State of Oklahoma v. Casey Lee Cloud |
The State of Oklahoma charged Casey Lee Cloud with: |
Maxwell's Pic-Pac, Inc. v. Tony Dehner |
A Kentucky statute prohibits businesses that sell substantial amounts of staple groceries or gasoline from applying for a license to sell wine and liquor. Ky. Rev. Stat. § 243.230(7). A regulation applies this provision to retailers that sell those items at a rate of at least 10% of gross monthly sales. 804 Ky. Admin. Regs. 4:270. Harmed by the statute, Maxwell’s Pic-Pac (a grocer) and Food |
Next Page |