¶1 Aruna G. Shah and Ghanshyam B. Shah appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for leave to amend their complaint against Intermountain Healthcare, Inc. (LDS Hospital), Dr. Kelly Myers, Dr. Thomas D. Bauman, Dr. George E. Thomsen, Dr. James Zebrack, and Dr. David S. Feuer (collectively, the Defendants). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 The Shahs were involved in an automobile acc

This case is a wrongful death and survival action. It arose from an automobile accident in which Stacey Hollingshead was tragically killed. The trial court entered a final judgment in this case on March 20, 2009. Richard Elliott and

2

West Texas Centers for MHMR (MHMR) appealed from the judgment. We reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case for further procee

The trial court rendered a take-nothing summary judgment in favor of appellees Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center1 and Hill-Rom Company, Inc. Through five issues,

1 The plaintiffs asserted a health care liability claim against Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center and its following employees: nurse manager Susan Moore and nurses

2

appellants Raymond Snodgrass, Jr., et al., to whom we

We sua sponte vacate and reconsider our original opinion in this matter. We substitute the following opinion for our original opinion.

This appeal by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company of money judgments in favor of the survivors of two smokers requires us to decide whether a decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in an earlier class action is entitled to full faith and credit in federal cou

This is a consolidated appeal of an award of attorney’s fees in two related cases. Both cases arose out of a boating accident in which Marilyn McCormick was killed, her minor son, G.M.M., was injured but survived, and the driver of the boat, James Pitcock, also survived. In the aftermath of the accident, litigation arose regarding the guardianship of G.M.M. and the administration of McCormick’

Kevin Fabricio Claros Cantarero ("Claros"), a citizen and native of El Salvador, is an ex-member of a violent criminal street gang based in the United States. Claiming that he would face persecution and torture on account of his former gang membership if repatriated, Claros applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). An Immigration Judge

Dionte Tyler brought this action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Kentucky’s usury laws, alleging that the debtcollection action instituted by DH Capital Management (DHC) sought to collect an

1

No. 13-5021 Tyler v. DH Capital Management, Inc.

Page 2

amount to which DHC was not legally entitled. The district court dismissed the suit, be

Jimmy Radford applied for social security disability benefits after he sustained an injury to his back. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied Radford’s claim, finding, among other things, that he was not disabled because his back impairment did not “meet or equal” Listing 1.04A, the regulation identifying disorders of the spine that merit a conclusive presumption of disability and an awar

Philip Morris USA, Inc., and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (collectively the "Tobacco Companies") challenge a final judgment entered after jury trial in favor of Theodore Hallgren, as personal representative of the estate of Claire Hallgren. The final judgment upheld the jury's award of approximately $1 million in compensatory damages, after factoring in Mrs. Hallgren's comparative fault, and $1.5

A real estate developer sued two individuals and a limited partnership asserting various claims. The defendants filed third-party claims against various third-party defendants seeking defense and indemnity based upon an agreement to

1 We deny the appellees’ motion for rehearing and the appellants’ motion for rehearing. We withdraw the opinion issued in this case on April 18, 2013, and i

By a single issue, appellant, Patricia Thornton, individually and as next friend of Logan Quinn, a minor child, contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees, Henkels & McCoy, Inc. and Ray Medrano (collectively “H&M”).

2

We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Thornton and her nine-year-old daughter, Logan, were driving westbound on U.S. Highway

This appeal presents the question of whether expert testimony based upon speculative assumptions is sufficient to support an award of future loss of earning capacity and the dilemma of determining whether such assumptions are reasonable just because “an expert says it is so.” Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. Havner, 953 S.W.2d

2

706, 712 (Tex. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1119, 118

When appellant Stephanie A. Novick and appellee Andrew A. Shervin got divorced, the trial judge found that Stephanie was “presently disabled” and ordered Andrew to pay her $2,000 per month for twenty-four months as spousal maintenance. As that period drew to an end, Stephanie filed a motion seeking to compel Andrew to continue paying her $2,000 per month.

Andrew opposed the motion and a

Joseph Hevey, in his capacity as co-trustee of the Will Slip 2011 Trust, appeals the trial court’s order dismissing Trust claims related to a marriage that occurred thirty-six years ago between Dale C. Bullough and appellee Margaret Hundley. Because we conclude a 2004 final decree of divorce bars the Trust’s claims, we affirm.

The summary judgment evidence shows the following. In 1977,

This defamation case arises from a series of articles published in the Mineral Wells Index (the Index), a newspaper owned by Newspaper Holdings, Inc. (NHI).

2

The articles reported regulatory compliance problems and official investigations into the Crazy Water Retirement Hotel, a local Mineral Wells assisted living facility, and examined the conduct of Charles Miller, president of th

¶1 Appellants brought suit to enjoin the enforcement of a law, claiming that the law violated the state constitution in four respects. The district court dismissed the first two claims and rejected the second two claims on summary judgment. On appeal, we consider whether Appellants had standing to bring these claims in the first place. We hold that, although they lacked the personal injury requir

¶1 This case arises out of prolonged and complicated divorce proceedings. Dennis Goggin (Dennis) and Tamara Goggin (Tammy) separated in 2005, ending a marriage that had lasted approximately ten years. The couple has spent nearly the same number of years litigating their divorce. Throughout the process, Dennis has engaged in a variety of contemptuous and obstructionist acts and has repeatedly viol

¶1 On certiorari, we are asked to decide whether Henry Day Ford (Henry Day) and Tom Watkins abandoned Motor Vehicle Sales Contracts (Vehicle Contracts or Contracts) for the sale of two Ford GT40s; whether the Contracts contained a latent ambiguity regarding the identity of the vehicles to be sold; and, in the event that Henry Day breached the Contracts, whether Mr. Watkins adequately mitigated hi

¶1 Petitioner Charles Lee Logan appeals to this Court from an order of the District Court of Oklahoma County denying his Application for Post-Conviction Relief in Case No. CF-2008-6242. Logan was convicted by a jury of Robbery with a Firearm, AFCF, 21 O.S.2001, § 801 (Count 1) and Robbery in the First Degree, AFCF, 21 O.S.2001, § 791 (Count 2).1 Logan was sentenced to imprisonment for life on C

¶1 Appellant, Roderick L. Smith, was convicted by a jury in Oklahoma County District Court, Case No. CF-1993-3968, of five counts of First Degree Murder, 21 O.S.1991, § 701.7(A). He was originally sentenced to death on all five counts. This Court affirmed his convictions and sentences on direct appeal. Smith v. State, 1996 OK CR 50, 932 P.2d 521. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari

In this marital dissolution case, appellant Clark Woolsey persuaded respondent Anna Woolsey to participate in a church-sponsored reconciliation session that turned into a mediation1 of issues regarding division of property, support, and custody of their two children. The mediation resulted in a marital settlement agreement that divided the community property, permanently waived Anna‘s2 entitleme

Plaintiff Ruby Cornejo filed this action for damages for violations of the California Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Gov. Code, § 8547 et seq.)1 in May

______________

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Government Code.

2

2010. She alleged that as a result of her reports starting in 1999 the practices and policies of the Department of Social Services (t

Plaintiffs and appellants Penny McCoy (McCoy) and Chandrashekhar Joshi (Joshi) (collectively “plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s orders granting special motions to strike, pursuant Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16,1 all of the causes of action asserted against defendants and respondents Syed Raheel (Raheel) and Lifeforce Cryobank Sciences, Inc. (Lifeforce) (collectively “defe

Dionte Tyler brought this action under the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Kentucky’s usury laws, alleging that the debtcollection
action instituted by DH Capital Management (DHC) sought to collect an

1

No. 13-5021 Tyler v. DH Capital Management, Inc. Page 2

amount to which DHC was not legally entitled. The district court dismissed the suit,

Ashley Cordle sued Stonegate Apartments, LLC; JRK Residential, LLC; Sunamerica Corporation; JRK Residential America, LLC; Stonegate Apartments, LP;p Smith Welding Fabrication & Repair, Inc., David L. Smith, William E. Smith, Homer Corley and Corley Construction on premises liability and negligence theories claiming:

1. Plaintiff is and was a resident of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma at