TULSA, OK - THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA charged JEREMY FRANKLIN THOMAS, A/K/A "FAT DADDY" with:

Count # 1. Count as Filed: OWPN, POSSESSION OF A FIREARM WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION OF DOC, in violation of 21 O.S. 1283 C
Date of Offense: 06/03/2014

Party Name Disposition Information

THOMAS, JEREMY FRANKLIN Disposed: DISMISSED, 09/29/2014. Dismissed- Request of the State

Claimants appeal an order by the district court that found Claimants’ Answer to the In Rem Forfeiture Complaint insufficient because it objected to providing
testimonial statements as to matters requested therein because claimant argued the
search and seizure were unlawful and such information would be fruit of the
poisonous tree, and simultaneously forfeited the property. (A1144-14

A good faith purchaser is “[a] purchaser who buys
without notice of circumstance which would put a person of
ordinary prudence on inquiry as to the title, or as to an
impediment on the title, of a seller.” (Black’s Law Dict. (6th ed.
1992) p. 693, col. 2.) The trial court found that respondent,
Steven Hall, was a good faith purchaser at a lien sale and
acquired the contents

James A. Carter, Jr. (James), formed Jim A. Carter, Jr., Logging LLC (Carter
Logging), with James as its sole member. Carter Logging entered into two loan agreements
1 This is the second time this case has been before us. We initially remanded it back to settle the record and ordered rebriefing. Jim A. Carter, Jr., Logging, LLC v. First Na

On April 27, 2016, plaintiff, Rico Lee, filed suit in the Twenty-Fourth
Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson against defendants, Pull-A-Part of
New Orleans West, LLC and The Phoenix Insurance Company,1 for damages
arising out of an alleged August 13, 2015 accident. In his petition, plaintiff alleged
that, while a customer at Pull-A-Part’s vehicle yard in Harvey,

The assault in this case occurred at the end of a high-speed chase. When the chase began, appellant was clocked at driving eighty-three miles per hour, nearly thirty miles per hour over the posted speed limit. An officer pursued appellant with lights and siren engaged, but appellant did not stop. Appellant turned on his vehicle’s emergency flashers and continued to speed away. Appellant’s behavior

In this putative class action against defendants and
respondents Williams-Sonoma, Inc., and Williams-Sonoma
Stores, Inc. (jointly, Williams-Sonoma), plaintiff and appellant
Harley Shine appeals from an order of dismissal following the
sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. Concluding
the demurrer was properly sustained on res judicata grounds, we
affirm.
FACTU

Brian Keith Heuston seeks a Certificate of Appealability (COA) to appeal the
denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We deny the COA.
I
In a 2008 jury trial in Oklahoma state court, Heuston was convicted of first
degree burglary, and assault and battery with intent to kill. Heuston was sentenced to
life imprisonment, to be followed by a consecutive 20-year sentence. Heuston fi

Plaintiff-Appellant Willie Harrington sued Defendant-Appellee Ozark Waffles,
L.L.C. (“Ozark”) in state court alleging employment discrimination. Construing the
claim as based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq.,
Ozark removed the case to federal district court. Based on Mr. Harrington’s failure to
prosecute, the district court dismissed the case

Timothy J. Hill, a prisoner in the Oklahoma Department of Corrections,
petitions for a Certificate of Appealability (COA), seeking to challenge the district
court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We deny the COA.
I
Around March 2012, Hill’s then-girlfriend, Stacie Lewis, gave birth to a girl,
T.H. On June 5, 2012, when T.H. was three months old, Lewis walked into the<

A. Legal Background—The Procedural Ordinance and 2008 Assessment
Under the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (PBID of
1994) (Sts. & Hy. Code,2 §§ 36600 et seq.), private property owners in a geographical
area can initiate formation of a business improvement district to assess themselves fees to
be spent promoting their businesses. (See Epstein v. Hollywood Ente

On July 6, 2007, Smith pled guilty to a single count of aggravated robbery, a severity level 3 person felony, in exchange for the dismissal of several other charges. A presentence investigation revealed that Smith had a criminal history score of A, based, in part, on two burglary convictions from 1988 and 1990. On September 26, 2008, the district court sentenced Smith to 221 months in prison, the

Plaintiffs Ivan Arnold and Deirdre Seim filed separate lawsuits against
Defendant HomeAway, Inc.
1 In each case, HomeAway sought to compel arbitration. Concluding that both Seim and Arnold are bound to arbitrate threshold arbitrability questions, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court in Arnold’s case and AFFIRM the judgment in Seim’s. We REMAND both cases with instructions to compe

Defendant-Appellant Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest (“Hartford”) appeals the district court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting that of Defendant-Appellee Axis Surplus Insurance Company (“Axis”). Hartford also challenges the district court’s grant of Axis’s motion to strike an affidavit submitted in support of its motion for summary judgment as untimely. For the

The Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board sued DISH Network Corp., seeking an injunction against unilateral changes to employee wages during collective bargaining. The district court granted the injunction in part. Both DISH and the Board appealed. We AFFIRM.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
DISH Network Corp. is a satellite television provider with production facilities

Tulsa, Oklahoma - The State of Oklahoma charged Dylan Stambaugh with:

Count # 1. Count as Filed: DU8II, UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG - METHAMPHETAMINE, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402
Date of Offense: 06/18/2014

Party Name Disposition Information

STAMBAUGH, DYLAN Disposed: CONVICTION, 08/20/2014. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF

This case arises out of a dispute under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”). Under the IDEA, when parents and school districts dispute a child’s educational placement, a parent may file an administrative due process complaint that can lead to an administrative hearing. At least ten days before the dispute reaches a hearing, the school district can extend a settlement offer to

¶1 Plaintiff Derrick Black appeals the trial court's March 22, 2016, Journal Entry of Judgment, entered on a jury verdict, in Plaintiff's vehicle negligence case. Based on our review of the facts and applicable law, we affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Plaintiff was severely injured on March 6, 2009, in a single-vehicle, non-contact accident, when he struck a curb while riding h

Linda Marshall appeals from the judgment on reserved issues following the
dissolution of her marriage to Bryan S. Marshall.1
Linda challenges two specific aspects
of the family court’s division of marital property. She contends the court erred declaring
a 2006 capital gains tax liability to be a community debt, notwithstanding the fact she had
obtained an “innocent spouse” det

This case presents an unusual circumstance: both parties insist that the plaintiffs lack Article III standing to sue. They draw opposing conclusions from this premise, however. The plaintiffs say that without standing their case could not be removed from state court using 28 U.S.C. § 1441; the defendant justifies removal but says the case then required dismissal for lack of standing. The district

Plaintiff Jorge Fierro filed the underlying action against defendant Landry's
Restaurant Inc.,1 seeking remedies for what Fierro alleges to be Landry's' violations of
specified California labor laws and wage orders. Fierro asserts claims on behalf of
himself and on behalf of a class of individuals that he alleges is similarly situated.
Landry's demurred to the complaint on the basi

The procedural history of this case is protracted and complex. A Sullivan County Criminal Court jury convicted the petitioner of one count of the first degree premeditated murder of Bristol Police Department Officer Mark Vance, who had been dispatched to the home of the petitioner’s girlfriend to answer a call that the petitioner was “at the house threatening her with a gun,” and sentenced him to

The facts of this case are straightforward. On November 29, 2006, appellant
entered a plea pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford in case No. CR0200601180 to one
count of aggravated robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1) and one count of
involuntary manslaughter in violation of R.C. 2903.04(A) and (C), felonies of the first
degree. The trial court accepted appellant’s plea,

On the evening of March 6, 2015, David Simonton drove a semitrailer truck to a local Sam's Club to make a delivery. His cousin, Craig Wolfe, accompanied him on the delivery. Upon detaching the trailer, the two men planned "[t]o find a club [and] get some weed" that evening. Simonton drove the cab to a nearby Walmart and purchased a small quantity of marijuana from some individuals. Simonton then e

Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Michael John Bever with:


Count # 1. Count as Filed: HM11, MURDER - FIRST DEGREE, in violation of 21 O.S. 701.7
Date of Offense: 07/22/2015
Party Name Disposition Information
BEVER, ROBERT DAVIS Disposed: CONVICTION, 09/07/2016. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: MURDER - FIRST DEGREE(HM11)
Violation of 21 O.S. 701.7