Tulsa, OK - Milton Solis and Elizabeth Solis sued Foot Locker Retail, Inc., d/b/a Kids Foot Locker, Foot Locker Specialty, Inc., d/b/a Kids Foot Locker, Keith Hunt on an assault and battery theory.

Date Code Description Count Party Amount
10-06-2015 TEXT

CIVIL RELIEF MORE THAN $10,000 INITIAL FILING.
1
10-06-2015 A&B

ASSAULT & BATTERY

Many people dream of having a lakefront home. Timothy
Jodway and his wife, Alaina, were no different. So they took out a mortgage loan from Fifth
Third Bank and purchased a home on Lake Charlevoix in Boyne City, Michigan. But things did
not go as planned. Money became tight, and Timothy Jodway eventually had to file for
bankruptcy. And as part of his Chapter 13 repayment plan, Jodw

Tulsa, OK - William Jame Row, Tina M. Westfall, W. Scott Row, James William Row and Estate of James Row sued Dennis E. Blankenship, D.O., et, Dennis E. Blankenship D.O., P.C. Jenny Alexopulus, D.O. and Andrea Edwards McEachern, M.D. on medical negligence theories.

Plaintiffs claimed that William James Row, age 67, was not told that he had a small early-stage cancerous lesion on his kidney

Kathleen McBride (McBride) sued Byron and Kalmia Smith (the Smiths) for
violating McBride’s rights with respect to a recorded easement over the Smiths’ property.
After sustaining demurrers to several versions of McBride’s complaint, the last without
leave to amend, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the Smiths. On appeal, we
conclude that McBride stated causes of action f

Mayes was arrested on June 15, 2010, and charged with one count of gross
sexual imposition. In an order entered on January 14, 2011, the trial court appointed an
attorney to defend Mayes, and on February 17, 2011, Mayes executed a time waiver of
unlimited duration with respect to “every offense and specification [with] which [he] could
[have] be[en] charged” as a result of the

In this suit affecting the parent-child relationship, Mother appeals orders modifying child support and enjoining Maternal Grandfather from unsupervised access to her child, J.D.A. For the following reasons, we modify the trial court’s final order in part, reverse it in part, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BACKGROUND
Mother and

Appellants and defendants San Diego County Office of Education (Office) and
Randolph E. Ward appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Rodger
Hartnett reinstating his employment and awarding him $306,954.99 in back pay, benefits,
and prejudgment interest. Defendants contend (1) collateral estoppel precluded the trial
court from granting Hartnett's requested relief

Appellant, Julie Lowery, appeals the trial court’s order that terminated spousal maintenance in favor of appellee, Houston Ford Lowery III. In three issues, Julie argues that (1) the trial court erred in terminating spousal maintenance and (2) Houston’s motion to clarify amounted to a collateral attack on the divorce decree.
2
We reverse.
Background
Julie and Houston entered into a

On December 5, 2014, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of
information charging defendant with one count of possession of heroin with the
intent to distribute in violation of La. R.S. § 40:966(A) and a second count of
possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute in violation of La. R.S. §
40:967(A).1 Defendant was arraigned on February 19, 2015, and ple

On December 21, 2014, Shawhan did not return to the Fort Des Moines
residential correctional facility. At that time, Butts and Kimberly Goemaat-Clark
(Clark) were living together in an apartment and were allowing Brian Mabrier and
Nicole Martin to stay with them. While on escape status, Shawhan occasionally
stayed with Butts and Clark.
On December 26, Butts, Clark, Ma

For the third time, we are called upon to assess the legality of the President’s efforts to bar over 150 million nationals of six designated countries1 from entering the United States or being issued immigrant visas that they would ordinarily be qualified to receive. To do so, we must consider the statutory and constitutional limits of the President’s power to curtail entry of foreign nationals in

In the underlying action, appellant Paula Boyd
asserted claims against respondent David Freeman
predicated on allegations of wrongful foreclosure. The trial
court sustained Freeman’s demurrer to Boyd’s first amended
complaint without leave to amend, reasoning that the
doctrine of res judicata barred her claims, in view of a
judgment in favor of Freeman and against Boyd in a

Leonard Oliver pleaded guilty to attempt to possess with intent to distribute 500
grams or more of cocaine and was sentenced to ten years in prison, the mandatory minimum
sentence for the offense given his criminal record. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(B), 846.1
The district court entered its judgment on September 30, 2011. The following year, Oliver
filed a tLeonard Oliver ple

This appeal involves the interplay of two federal statutes: the OSH Act and the Mine Act, both administered under the authority of the Secretary of Labor. The Secretary of Labor is authorized to enforce the OSH Act, which is designed to ensure the safe working conditions for every worker in the nation. 29 U.S.C. § 651(b). When Congress enacted the OSH Act, however, certain federal agencies alre

This case concerns multiple challenges under the National Environmental Policy Act to Maryland’s proposed “Purple Line” light rail project. Two orders of the district court are principally at issue. In the first order, the district court directed the Federal Transit Administration (“FTA”) to prepare a supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (“SEIS”) to analyze the effects of Metrorail’s rec

Tulsa, OK - Manuel L. Peeples, Laura Ann Peeples and Collette Rashune Peeples, deceased, sued Sarah Elizabeth Ellison on a wrongful death auto negligence theory claiming that Collette Rashune Peeople was struck by a motor vehicle operated by the Defendant in a careless and reckless manner.

Issue # 1. Issue: AUTO NEGLIGENCE (AUTONEG)
Filed By: PEEPLES, MANUEL L
Filed Date: 08/04/2

TULSA, OK - THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA charged LEONARD FRANKLIN PYLES JR, A/K/A LEO PYLES JR with:


Count # 1.
Count as Filed: LA4, POSSESSION OF STOLEN VEHICLE, in violation of 47 O.S. 4-103
Date of Offense: 06/16/2014

Party Name

Disposition Information

PYLES, LEONARD FRANKLIN JR
Disposed: CONVICTION, 08/14/2014. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: PO

This case arises from an unfortunate family dispute among Appellants
Roger Liverman and Aaron Liverman, on the one side, and Katheryn Payne Hall
(Roger’s daughter and Aaron’s sister) on the other. The dispute is rooted in a
1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2
disagreement over mechanic’s liens filed by Appellants against Hall’s home in
2008. See Liverman v. State, 470 S.W.3d 831,

The primary question in this interlocutory appeal from the denial of Appellant The City of The Colony, Texas’s jurisdictional plea is whether a nexus
1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2
exists between the City’s use of a “Vac” truck to clear a blockage in a sewer main and the property damage that Appellees Mark and Kim Rygh sustained when their residence flooded with raw sewage. Because we re

This is an appeal from the trial court’s granting of a plea to the jurisdiction.
Appellant Christopher Leron Clegg appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his suit
1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2
against Appellee the City of Fort Worth (the City).2 Because the trial court did not
err by granting the City’s plea to the jurisdiction, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
At approximately

This is an accelerated interlocutory appeal from the juvenile court’s order waiving jurisdiction over a minor, pseudonymously referred to as John Francis Conner, and transferring the case to criminal district court so he can be tried as an
2
adult for capital murder.1 In a single issue, John contends that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to sustain the juvenile court’s fi

Elnicki's motion follows three jury trials on the charges underlying this case. He was originally charged with aggravated kidnapping, rape, and aggravated sodomy for events occurring in November 2001. During his first trial in 2002, the district court dismissed the kidnapping charge, and Elnicki was convicted of rape and aggravated criminal sodomy. On direct appeal, the Kansas Supreme Court revers

Appellants and defendants San Diego County Office of Education (Office) and
Randolph E. Ward appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Rodger
Hartnett reinstating his employment and awarding him $306,954.99 in back pay, benefits,
and prejudgment interest. Defendants contend (1) collateral estoppel precluded the trial
court from granting Hartnett's requested relief

Tulsa, OK - William Ess sued Standley Daniels on a strict liability dog bite negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged when attacked by a pitbull mix dog and a malamute mix dog owned by Defendant.

Issue # 1. Issue: STRICT LIABILITY (LIABLE)
Filed By: ESS, WILLIAM
Filed Date: 01/21/2015
Party Name Disposition Information
Defendant: DANIELS, STANDLE

Tulsa, OK - Lisa Kay Rumer sued Nationwide Freight Systems, Inc., Ljunio Radovanovic, Start Insurance Company and Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.

Issue # 1. Issue: AUTO NEGLIGENCE (AUTONEG)
Filed By: RUMER, LISA KAY
Filed Date: 08/26/2013
Party Name Disposition Information
Defendant: MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP INC Disposed: DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 01/12/2015.