State of Oklahoma v. Christopher Allen Fisher |
State of Oklahoma v. Christopher Allen Fisher |
Michael Dean Scott v. Marc Houk, Warden |
After his conviction in Ohio state court for two murders and the |
Elaine Damianakis v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. |
Elaine Damianakis, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Nikitas Damianakis, appeals a final judgment in favor of Philip Morris USA, Inc., which followed the trial court's grant of Philip Morris's motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted Philip Morris's motion for summary judgment on the ground that the statute of limitations barred Mrs. Damianakis's claims, based on its prerequi $0 (07-18-2014 - FL) |
The People v. Jeffrey Allen Whitmer |
Defendant, the manager of a motorcycle dealership, arranged for the fraudulent sales of vehicles to fictitious buyers. A jury convicted him of 20 counts of grand theft for 20 separate fraudulent sales. We must decide whether defendant was properly convicted of a separate theft for each vehicle fraudulently sold, or whether he could be convicted of only one count of grand theft because all of the s $0 (07-24-2014 - CA) |
Floyd Lowe v. The Superior Court of San Joaquin County and The People |
Convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and sentenced under the “Three Strikes” law more than 15 years ago, petitioner Floyd Lowe (defendant) recently filed a petition for resentencing under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012. The trial court denied the petition because defendant was armed with a firearm and intended to cause great bodily injury when he possessed the firearm. $0 (07-25-2014 - CA) |
Frank and Shelley Thornton v. Northeast Harris County MUD 1 |
Appellee Northeast Harris County MUD 1 filed an eminent domain suit against appellants Frank and Shelley Thornton. The Thorntons brought counterclaims for inverse condemnation, nuisance, trespass, and negligent trespass. MUD filed a plea to the jurisdiction, arguing that there was no legislative waiver of its governmental immunity and that the Thorntons’ counterclaims did not give rise to a cons $0 (07-24-2014 - TX) |
D. Brent Lemon v. Daniel Hagood |
D. Brent Lemon appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Daniel Hagood following a jury trial in this breach-of-contract suit. The jury found Lemon breached the contract and determined Hagood suffered damages of $97,024.77 and that his reasonable attorney’s fees in the trial court were $125,000. The trial court entered judgment for Hagood on the verdict. Lemon brings ten issues on appeal $0 (07-24-2014 - TX) |
State of Oklahoma v. Nicholas Solis |
State of Oklahoma v. Nicholas Solis |
State of Oklahoma v. Justin Levi Brimer |
State of Oklahoma v. Justin Levi Brimer |
Lilas Moua v. Pittullo, Howington, Barker, Abernathy, LLP |
Lilas Moua (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court |
State of Oklahoma v. Christina L. Winn |
State of Oklahoma v. Christina L. Winn |
Mark Bernhard v. City of Aransas Pass, Texas |
This appeal arises from the granting of a plea to the jurisdiction. Appellant Mark Bernhard raises three issues on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in granting the plea to the jurisdiction; (2) his claims are not barred by the Recreational Use Statute (“RUS”), see TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 75.001–.007 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d |
The Fannin County Community Supervision and Corrections Department v. Glenda Spoon |
The Fannin County Community Supervision and Corrections Department (Department) appeals the denial of its plea to the jurisdiction in a whistleblower action filed by its former employee, Glenda Spoon. “[W]histleblowing is ‘the act of a man or woman who, believing that the public interest overrides the interest of the organization he [or she] serves, publicly “blows the whistle” if the orga $0 (07-16-2014 - TX) |
B. L. M. v. J. H. M., III |
B.L.M. (Beth) appeals the termination of her parental rights to P.M. and B.M., her |
Cody Patton v. Maggie Donoho a/k/a Margaret Donoho |
Issue # 1. |
Luis Jesus Guzman v. Dale Piercy v. Canyon County |
Dale Piercy appeals the district court’s dismissal of his amended action for declaratory relief, which challenged the validity of a herd district ordinance enacted in 1982 by the Canyon County Commissioners. The district court dismissed Piercy’s claim on the basis that it was barred by a seven-year statute of limitations or, in the alternative, a four-year statute of limitations. Piercy challe $0 (02-07-2014 - ID) |
Bradley K. Morgan v. New Sweden Irrigation District |
This case arose after New Sweden Irrigation District ("New Sweden") mowed the canal |
Hallmark Cards v. Monitor Clipper Partners |
Hallmark Cards, Inc. (Hallmark), hired Monitor Company Group, L.P. |
E.M. v. Pajaro Valley Unified School District Office of Administrative Hearings |
In 2004, before E.M. entered the fourth grade, he was first |
Michael I. Leavitt v. Bruce Holbrook |
In this appeal, we resolve whether a statutory probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over a suit, filed in 2004, seeking to clear a cloud on title. The suit, filed by the owners of the executive mineral rights against the trustee of a testamentary trust, sought to remove a cloud on the ownership of minerals on land |
Kevin Johnson v. Heckmann Water Resources (CVR) |
The district court granted Defendants–Appellees’ motion for summary judgment, finding that they did not violate the overtime wage requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by using a Monday through Sunday workweek to calculate overtime compensation. We affirm. |
Friends of Merrymeeting Bay and Environment Maine v. Hydro Kennebec, LLC |
Two conservation groups, Friends |
R. Wayne Klein v. King & King & Jones |
R. Wayne Klein (“Mr. Klein” or “Receiver”), the court-appointed receiver for |
State of Oklahoma v. Danny J. Trevathan |
State of Oklahoma v. Danny J. Trevathan |
Cindy Lee Garcia v. Google, Inc. |
While answering a casting call for a low-budget amateur |
Next Page |