State of Oklahoma v. Keith Russell Greere

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: ABOFF, ASSAULT & BATTERY UPON A POLICE OFFICER , in violation of 21 O.S. 649
Date Of Offense: 10/19/2012

Party Name: Disposition Information:

GREERE, KEITH RUSSELL
Disposed: DEFERRED, 04/29/2013. Guilty Plea.
Count as Disposed:ASSAULT & BATTERY UPON A POLICE OFFICER (ABOFF)
Vio

In this case, we again address whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts a state law rule that restricts enforcement of terms in arbitration agreements. Here, an employee seeks to bring a class action lawsuit on behalf of himself and similarly situated employees for his employer‘s alleged failure to compensate its employees for, among other things, overtime and meal and rest periods. Th

Defendant Steven J. Weinberg, an individual, appeals from an amended judgment adding him as judgment debtor to a judgment against defendant Steven J. Weinberg, a

2

Professional Law Corporation (the “law corporation�), in the amount of $77,808.39.

The trial court found there was substantial evidence of Weinberg’s liability as an alter ego of the law corporation. The trial

In this accelerated appeal, appellant Arnold Ochoa challenges the trial court’s judgment granting a plea to the jurisdiction in favor of appellee, the City of Palmview, Texas (“Palmview�), on the basis of governmental immunity. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Ochoa served as a patrolman with the Palmview Police Department beginning in

2

1995. According to Ochoa, in 2011,

In this personal injury lawsuit, appellee Wanda Fife sued appellant Vladimir Landagan for negligence arising out of a car accident. The trial court granted a no-answer default judgment in favor of Fife. Landagan then moved for a new trial,

2

arguing that Fife did not serve him with process at his correct address. The trial court denied this motion. In one issue, Landagan contends tha

Appellant William Bush1 challenges the trial court’s judgment granting appellees Cardtronics, Inc. (“Cardtronics USA�) and Cardtronics Mexico, S.A. de

2

C.V.’s motion to dismiss based on a forum selection clause. In four issues, Bush argues that the forum selection clause does not govern because (1) Bush performed under an earlier contract; (2) the latter contract did not rep

MMS Construction & Paving, L.L.C. entered into a subcontract with Head, Inc. to pave asphalt runway shoulders at Altus Air Force Base in Oklahoma. The project was delayed and MMS, expressing concern that Head had not been making agreed payments, quit the job. MMS also complained that completing the job would be more expensive than it originally believed because certain requirements were being impo

Plaintiff Jayquan Brown appeals from a judgment entered on December 13, 2012, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Paul A. Crotty, Judge), in favor of defendants the New York City Department of Education (‚DOE‛) and DOE principal Joshua Laub. The district court awarded DOE summary judgment on Brown’s federal claim for relief under the Fair Labor Standard

Tulsa, OK - Criminal defense lawyer Mike Manning represented Darwin Alex Howard, Jr. a/k/a Dwayne Anthony Prudom who was charged with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: ODO, UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE , in violation of 63 O.S. 2-401 A1
Date Of O

Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Edwin Jermaine Daniels, age 26, with first-degree murder in violation of 21 O.S. 701.7 and shooting with intent of kill in violation of 21 O.S. 652A in connection with the death of Kayla Danielle Ferrante who was shot and killed on May 26, 2012 while setting in a car. Ms. Farrante, age 17, had just graduated from high school when she was struck in the bac

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of a summary judgment motion based on governmental immunity.1 The Montrose Management District (the District), the Public Officials,2 and Executive Director Bill Calderon (collectively, the Appellants) assert that the trial court erred in denying their summary judgment motion on several grounds. In their first issue, which contains several sub-issu

Today we decide whether an on-call Houston Police Department SWAT1 officer driving his personal vehicle to respond to a hostage stand-off situation is “responding to an emergency call� for the purposes of governmental immunity.2

1 Houston Police Department’s Special Weapons and Tactics Unit (SWAT) provides tactical support and assistance in high-risk operations and other emergency sit

Appellant, Beverly Brazee, appeals from the trial court’s order denying her writ of mandamus seeking to require the disclosure of documents by Appellee, City of Spur. In support, Brazee asserts the trial court erred by (1) denying her request for a writ of mandamus, (2) finding her request was moot while her request for attorney’s fees and litigation expenses remained pending, and (3) failing

State of Oklahoma v. Rico Montwon Reed and Anthony Joseph Wilkins

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: DU8I, UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG , in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402
Date Of Offense: 10/04/2012

Party Name: Disposition Information:

Defendant: WILKINS, ANTHONY JOSEPH
Disposed: CONVICTION, 09/30/2013. Guilty Plea.
Count as Disposed:UNLAWFUL POSSES

On March 21, 2013, a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York found City of New York police officers Richard DeMartino (“DeMartino�) and Shaun Grossweiler (“Grossweiler�) (the

3

“Officers�) liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for employing excessive force while arresting Plaintiff�Appellant Anna Stanczyk (“Stanczyk�) in November 2010.

Marissa Barker v. Southern Hill Residences, LLC d/b/a Seminole Ridge Apartments; D&S Management, Inc.; and Jason Lynne Hoover

Issue # 1.
Issue: TORT- PERSONAL (TORTP)
Filed by: Barker, Marissa
Filed Date: 01/03/2011
Party Name: Disposition Information:

Defendant: Southern Hill Residences, L.L.C.
Disposed: JUDGEMENT FOR PLAINTIFF, 05/13/2014. Jury Trial.

Plaintiff-appellants appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, District Judge), which granted dismissal of their claims under the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution, as well as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (“RFRA�). Appellants are eleven individuals who self-iden

¶1 Plaintiff/Appellant, Rural Water, Sewer and Solid Waste Management District No. 1, Logan County, Oklahoma (Logan-1), appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Defendants/Appellees, the City of Guthrie and the Guthrie Public Works Authority (collectively, Guthrie), in this action to compel Guthrie to sell water to Logan-1. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Â

This is an appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment in a legal malpractice suit. Attorney Robert E. White and the law firm of Childs, Bishop & White, PC (referred to collectively in this opinion as “White�) had represented Bobby Bowen in a personal injury case involving a vehicle collision. After Bowen’s claims for personal injury against the driver and the owner of the vehicle

2

This appeal casts a harsh light on some of the darkest corners of life in Chicago. The plaintiff, at the time of the events giving rise to this suit, was a general in the El Rukn street gang, out on parole for a murder conviction, when he became embroiled in a second murder. Among the defendants are several disgraced police officers, including the infamous Jon Burge, a man whose name evokes shame

Yvonne Averhart, formerly employed as a guard at the Cook County Jail, was suspended without pay in 2001 and fired in 2003. She filed her first federal lawsuit in 2001; the current suit is her fourth. She has lost them all. She filed and lost two state suits as well. The district court dis-­�‑ missed the current suit as barred by the earlier decisions. Averhart believes that the Sheriff’s D

Plaintiff-appellants appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, District Judge), which granted dismissal of their claims under the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution, as well as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (“RFRA�). Appellants are eleven individuals who self-iden

State of Oklahoma v. Troy A. Methvin

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: DI6AM, DUI ALCOHOL - SECOND OFFENSE (MUNICIPAL ARREST) , in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902 A 2
Date Of Offense: 03/16/2012

Party Name: Disposition Information:

METHVIN, TROY A
(After Prior Convictions)
Disposed: DEFERRED, 01/29/2014. Guilty Plea.
Count as Disposed:DUI ALCOHOL - SECOND O

This appeal arises from a dispute over whether the term of an oil and gas lease was extended by a payment made by the lessee. After the parties concluded their negotiation of the lease terms, the lease provided that the lessee could pay a “shut-in well royalty payment� to extend the term of the lease “[i]f, at the expiration of the primary term there is located on the leased premises a well

Fredia Alexander appeals the trial court’s denial of her petition for bill of review challenging the final decree of her divorce from Allan Alexander.1 We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BACKGROUND

In 2006, the trial court signed a final decree of divorce between the parties, rendered by default with respect to Fredia. In 2008, Fredia challenged the decree by bill of review, a