Wichita, Kansas family law lawyers represent man and wife in an adoption case.

"1. On or about December 17, 2023[,] Baby Boy [S.] was born in Wichita, Sedgwick [C]ounty[,] Kansas.

"2. [R.S.] . . . is the natural mother of Baby Boy [S.]. [R.S.] has filed a consent to allow Baby Boy [S.] to be adopted.

"3. In connection with the adoption proceeding, [R.S.] f

Mobile, Alabama criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with intentional murder, a violation of § 13A-6-2(a)(1), Ala. Code 1975, attempted murder, a violation of §§ 13A-4-2 and 13A-6-2, Ala. Code 1975 , attempted first- degree assault,[1] a violation of §§ 13A-4-2 and 13A-6-20, Ala. Code 1975, and discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle, a violation of § 13A-11-61, A

Miami, Florida pro se Defendant unsuccessfully represented him self when charged with unlawful transportation of firearms.

Jonas Michel, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Part A of Amendment 821 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a retroactive amendment eliminating or re

Miami, Florida civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a First Amendment violation theory.

John Labriola was a media aide for the Miami-Dade Board
of County Commissioners. Labriola v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 693 F.
Supp. 3d 1284, 1287 (S.D. Fla. 2023). In his own name and on his
own time, Labriola wrote an opinion piece that criticized the
Equality Act, an as-y

Concord, New Hampshire civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a Birth Rights Citizenship issue.

"Ruling from the bench, Laplante granted a request from immigration rights attorneys to certify a nationwide class that “will be comprised only of those deprived of citizenship” and issued a preliminary injunction indefinitely blocking Trump’s Day One order from being enforced

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with First Degree Rape (Counts 1-18) (21 O.S.1991, § 1114); and Forcible Oral Sodomy (Counts 19-30) (21 O.S.Supp. 1992, § 888),

2009 OK CR 7, 204 P3d 777 (2009):

¶10 The record shows the State filed a pre-trial Notice of Intent to Introduce Evidence of Other Crimes, specifically the sexual offen

Charleston, South Carolina personal injury class action lawyers represented the Plaintiff wo sued on breach of warranty and unjust enrichment theories

There was a national recall of newborn lounger pillows in 2021 after eight infant deaths revealed safety risks from this product.

Hudson filed a putative class action lawsuit against Boppy in the United States District Court for t

Washington, DC criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with insurance fraud
Owings Mills Couple Sentenced for Roles in $20-Million Insurance Fraud Scheme

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Illegal Reentry
Brazilian National Charged with Illegal Reentry

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful reentry of a deported alien
Brazilian National Charged with Illegal Reentry

Tampa, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud and possessing a firearm
Tampa Man Sentenced To 5 Years In Prison For Embezzling More Than $500,000 From St. Petersburg Company

Tucson, Arizona criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Attempted Carjacking, Use and Discharge of a Firearm During and In Relation to a Crime of Violence

Mexican National Charged After Killing of Attempted Carjacking Victim in Tucson, Arizona

Cleveland, Ohio civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking a writ of habeaus corpus.

A jury convicted David Smith in state court of attempted murder and other crimes based on the victim’s identification of Smith as her assailant. We later determined the state violated Smith’s due process rights because the victim’s identification was obtained through unduly suggestive mea

Detroit, Michigan consumer law lawyers represented this plaintiffs who sought to sue on a class action basis on product liability theory.

With the introduction of automatic transmissions in cars, clutch pedals became obsolete for drivers who do not enjoy using a stick shift. General Motors’ Hydra-Matic became the first readily accessible automatic transmission on the market in 1939. It

Amarillo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm.

18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) is a federal law that prohibits individuals convicted of felonies from possessing firearms. Specifically, it makes it unlawful for any person "who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding on

San Angelo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Illegal Re-Entry After Deportation.

* * *

8 U.S.C. 1326 makes it a crime for a non-citizen who has been deported or removed from the United States to reenter the country without permission. Specifically, it prohibits a person who has been denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed from the U.S

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with racketeering, wire fraud, money laundering, and Truth-In-Lending Act (“TILA”) offenses.

* * *

Legal issue Can the government obtain clear title to forfeited substitute assets following a criminal conviction and resolution of all third-party claims?
Headnote

CRIMINAL LAW. FORFE

San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking and making threats of injury in interstate communications.

Steven Daniel Weste was convicted for cyberstalking and sending threatening interstate communications.He filed a motion to suppress, contending that the warrantless search of his cell phone while in a halfway house violated the Fourth A

Rockville, Maryland family law lawyers represented the parties in divorce.

The parties were married on August 18, 2001. At the time of the trial in 2023, Wife was 55 years old, and Husband was 57 years old.

Four children were born as a result of the marriage. At the time of the trial, the oldest child (born in 2003) was a college student. The second child was born in 2005, the t

Richmond, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating a protective order.

On November 24, 2018, L.M. obtained a permanent protective order against appellant, with whom she had a young son. The protective order prohibited appellant from having "contact of any kind with" L.M. except as permitted by a custody or visitation order and from "commit[ting] ac

Charlotte, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of conspiring to possess and distribute over fifty grams of methamphetamine and one count of possessing over fifty grams of
methamphetamine with intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846.

Cabrera-Rivas grew up in Honduras. His formal schooling ended in third grade; he
starte

Alexandria, Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights claim.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, federal courts may permit an indigent prisoner to proceed without prepaying filing fees or giving security. The legal term for proceeding this way is in forma pauperis. But Congress expressed concern that prisoners were filing many “frivolous lawsuits floodin

Knoxville, Tennessee family law lawyer represented the Defendant in a divorce action.

* * *

APPELLATE PROCEDURE. FINAL JUDGMENT REQUIREMENT. The case addresses whether the appellant could pursue an appeal in the absence of a final judgment from the trial court, which is a prerequisite for an appeal as of right according to court rules.

APPELLATE PROCEDURE. JURISDICTION.

Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence claim.

. This case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred at 4:30 p.m. on September 27, 2015 at the intersection of Route 106 and Staniels Road in Loudon (intersection). Plaintiff Tamre McCrae was traveling south on Route 106 when, while attempting to make a left turn onto Staniels Road, he

Boston, Massachusetts family law lawyers represented the husband and wife in a divorce action.

"In making a property division and alimony determination under G. L. c. 208, § 34, a judge must make findings indicating that [she] has considered all factors relevant under § 34, and has not considered any irrelevant factors." T.E. v. A.0., 82 Mass.App.Ct. 586, 592 (2012), quoting Bowring v.