Shirley Wehmeyer ("Plaintiff") appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of FAG Bearings Corp. ("Defendant").(FN1) Plaintiff contends that she was actually or constructively discharged and discriminated against in that Defendant forced her to accept a layoff or move to a shift she was unable to work; that she was not allowed to exercise bumping or recall rights even though she did not have jo

Rochelle Smith is a former investigator at the Albuquerque District Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). She sued the EEOC on April 16, 2003, in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, claiming violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. She alleged that she was the victim of race discrimination, n

Plaintiff Christine Holcomb filed suit against her employer, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), alleging two violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: first, discrimination against her on the basis of race when the corporation failed to select her for a promotion; and second, retaliation against her in the form of reduced work responsibilities when she filed

Plaintiff Roger Grubbs appeals from the entry of summary judgment for defendants Haskell County, sheriff Manuel Ballard, and undersheriff Ken Bailes in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleged that defendants violated his constitutional rights in two respects: (1) denying him equal protection under the law by failing to enforce trespass laws to protect his property, and (2) causing

After the district court1 granted summary judgment to Yellow Book USA, Inc., and Victoria Kreutz (now Victoria Hammon) on all of Tammy Powell's employmentrelated claims, she appealed. We affirm.

I.

Ms. Powell began her employment at Yellow Book as a data-entry processor. After an interview, Yellow Book promoted her to a financial service representative. In this new job she sat n

Ruth Apodaca was arrested on January 14, 2002, by Officer B. Lucero of the Albuquerque Police Department after a high-speed chase involving a car in which she was a passenger. On June 24, 2002, she filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico against the City of Albuquerque, Mayor Martin Chavez III, and Officer Lucero (Defendants) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

This case arises from a complaint filed by plaintiff, Joann Melena, alleging that her employer, defendant Anheuser-Busch, Inc., terminated her employment in retaliation for her filing of a workers' compensation claim with the Illinois Industrial Commission. The circuit court of Jefferson County denied Anheuser-Busch's motion to dismiss and compel arbitration or, in the alternative, to stay t

J. Michael Dooley (Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court's judgment granting St. Louis County (County), Charlie A. Dooley (Executive), and James Baker's (Baker) (collectively referred to as Defendants), in their individual and official capacities, motion to dismiss Plaintiff's petition, which was filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (petition). The petition alleged that Defendants had vio

Former Oklahoma City Police Department forensic chemist Joyce A. Gilchrist sued the City of Oklahoma City and certain of its employees(1) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She alleged Defendants terminated her employment in retaliation for engaging in speech protected by the First Amendment, conspired to deprive her of constitutionally protected rights, defamed her, denied her procedural and substantive

Second-grade teacher Linda K. Greenshields became embroiled in a conflict with the Stillwater School District ("Stillwater") after Stillwater began requiring teachers to use "learning modules" for science instruction. After a protracted dispute, the Stillwater Board of Education ("Board") voted not to reemploy Greenshiel Greenshields brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming Stillwater had

Celisity Klein-Cadotte v. Barker & Little, Inc. and Doug Hamilton on a civil rights theory, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, claiming that Mr. Hamilton created a sexually hostile work environment for her and her co-workers in his Rapid City real estate rental properties company. Plaintiff began working for Defendant Barker & Little on July 30, 2001. She was fired by her supervisor, Defendant Douglas Hamilton

George Alberigi is 52 years old and was employed by the County of Sonoma for nearly twenty-five years. In the mid-1980s, Alberigi was diagnosed with panic disorder and agoraphobia. These disabilities make it difficult for Alberigi to interact in person with strangers. The County accommodated Alberigi's disabilities for fifteen years by allowing him to restrict his face-to-face contact with c

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) brought suit under 42 U.S.C. 2000e against Associated Security Enforcement, Inc. claiming that the defendant for sexual harassment and retaliation on behalf of four woman. The women claimed that one of the company's owners groped her breasts, requested sex in exchange for money, asked them for overnight stays and requested oral sex. The

Employment discrimination and retaliation under the Florida Civil Rights Act. Plaintiff, a computer systems administrator, claimed he was paid less than other computer system administrators and passed over for promotion because of his age and/or national origin and was retaliated against after he complained about the discrimination. He claimed lost wages and emotional distress damages.

Employment discrimination and retaliation under the Florida Civil Rights Act. Plaintiff, a computer systems administrator, claimed he was paid less than other computer system administrators and passed over for promotion because of his age and/or national origin and was retaliated against after he complained about the discrimination. He claimed lost wages and emotional distress damages.

Pamela L. DePaoli, age 49, sued Vacation Sales Associates under 42 U.S.C. 2000e, for allegedly firing her in retaliation for filing an age and gender discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Depaoli sold time shares at the Virginia Beach Oceanfront for Vacation Sales Associates from 1997 until she was removed from her Sales Manager position in July 2003. She was

Race discrimination and retaliation. The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

Boxer X appeals the dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, of his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Angela Harris, a guard at his Georgia prison, who, according to the complaint, made him strip and masturbate for her enjoyment. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, which found that Boxer's complaint did not state an Eighth Amendmen

Plaintiff George Webb appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for defendant, Level 3 Communications, LLC (Level 3), on his claims of age discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

I.

In 1997, at the age of fifty-five, Web

Kendra Lynn sued TNT Logistics for violating the Missouri Human Rights Act by allowing her supervisor to sexually harass her. Ms. Lynn also sued for retaliation, claiming she was discharged because she complained of harassment.

TNT Logistics claimed that it took appropriate action to stop the inappropriate behavior on the part of the supervisor when his conduct was reported by the plainti

Plaintiffs are employees of the City of Altus, Oklahoma (City). They appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment dismissing all their claims against the City, the City Administrator, and the Street Commissioner (collectively referred to as Defendants). All claims arise out of the City's English-only policy for its employees. Asserting claims of both disparate-impact and disparate-trea

The district court entered summary judgment dismissing Hardage's sexual harassment and retaliation claims against CBS Broadcasting Inc., Viacom Television Stations Inc., and Viacom Broadcasting of Seattle Inc. (collectively, CBS), pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD). The district court concluded that CBS was entitled to as

Appellant Joseph J. Gonzales brought suit against his former employer, appellee Qwest Communications, Inc., alleging national origin discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-1 to 2000e-17 and under 42 U.S.C. 1981. Mr. Gonzales also alleged age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. 621-34. The district co

Edward Florez brought a complaint alleging unlawful discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101-12213, and the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. 2601-2654. Florez chose to sue Holly Corporation, the parent corporation of his former employer, Navajo Refining Company. The district court determined that Holly was not Florez

Darold Maxfield appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Cintas Corporation No. 2 ("Cintas"), on his claims of employment discrimination based on race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et s