Raymond E. Horne v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 16 |
The trial court granted summary judgment to respondent District Council 16 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades on appellant Raymond E. Horne’s employment discrimination action. Horne appeals, contending inter alia that the afteracquired evidence doctrine precluded consideration of evidence of the impact of his prior conviction on the issue of his qualification for a union organizer... More... $0 (12-07-2013 - ca) |
Kim Muniz v. United Parcel Services, Inc. |
Kim Muniz sued her employer United Parcel Service, Inc., (“UPS”) in California State Superior Court for employment-related discrimination in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), California Government Code § 12900. Muniz made no federal claim. UPS removed the case to federal court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. The case was tried to a jury which ... More... $0 (12-05-2013 - CA) |
Linda Adams v. MHC Colony Park Limited Partnership |
More than 70 residents of a 186-space mobilehome park sued the owner for failing to properly maintain the park’s physical improvements and common facilities, including the park’s sewer system, water pressure, electrical system, and matters related to security such * Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception o... More... $0 (12-03-2013 - CA) |
Bryan Craig v. Rich Township High School District 227 |
In 2012, Bryan Craig selfpublished a short book of adult relationship advice entitled “It’s Her Fault.” And when we say “adult,” we mean it in every sense of the word—in his book, Craig repeatedly discusses sexually provocative themes and uses sexually explicit terminology. Eventually, Craig’s employer, a school district located in Chicago’s south suburbs, learned of the publica2 |
Dwayne Volkman v. Lee Ryker |
Dwayne Volkman was employed as a casework supervisor at the Lawrence Correctional Center in Illinois when he called the local State’s Attorney to comment |
Michael Michalski v. Scripps Mercy Hospital |
This action arises out of the denial of medical staff membership and surgical privileges to the plaintiff Michael Michalski, M.D., at three Scripps Health hospitals after Dr. Michalski was found by the Scripps Judicial Review Committee (JRC), Scripps Health Board of Trustees (Board), and the Medical Board of California (Medical Board) |
Jeffrey J. Black v. Idaho State Police |
This appeal arises from the termination of Jeffry Black, the former Executive Director of the Idaho Peace Officer Standards and Training Council (POST). Black asserts that the Idaho State Police (ISP) violated two provisions of the Idaho Protection of Public Employees Act (commonly, the “Whistleblower Act”) when it terminated him. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of ISP, ho... More... $0 (11-27-2013 - ID) |
Wade Frogley v. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 |
Plaintiff, Wade Frogley (“Frogley”), appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Meridian Joint School District No. 2 (“Meridian School District”), Aaron Maybon, and Linda Clark (collectively “Respondents”) on Frogley’s complaint of retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Idaho Human Rights Act. |
Alicia Faye Baxter v. State of Florida |
Alicia F. Baxter claims that the imposition of a twenty-year state prison sentence, which followed her rejection of the trial court’s offer of eleven months and twenty-nine days in county jail, meets the standard for what is known as “judicial vindictiveness.” In addition, she claims the trial court erred by refusing to |
Alicia Faye Baxter v. State of Florida |
Alicia F. Baxter claims that the imposition of a twenty-year state prison sentence, which followed her rejection of the trial court’s offer of eleven months and twenty-nine days in county jail, meets the standard for what is known as “judicial vindictiveness.” In addition, she claims the trial court erred by refusing to |
Sikhs for Justice v. Parkash Singh Badal |
This appeal presents a single issue, which is whether the defendant was served with process; yet the case could be the basis for a novel of international intrigue. Sikhism is an Indian religion. Most Sikhs live in the northwestern Indian state of Punjab. The state’s highest official is its Chief Minister. Parkash Singh Badal, the defendant |
Sara C. Debord v. Mercy Health System of Kansas, Inc. |
Sara Debord filed suit against her employer, Mercy Health Services of Kansas, for sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII. Debord claims Mercy knew or should have known that her supervisor created a hostile workplace through unwanted touching and offensive sexual remarks. She also claims that Mercy did not do enough to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace, and that, when ... More... $0 (11-26-2013 - KS) |
Kingsaire, Inc., dba Kings Aire, Inc. v. Jorge Melendez |
Appellant Kingsaire, Inc. d/b/a Kings Aire, Inc. (hereinafter “Kings Aire”) appeals an adverse jury verdict and judgment in favor of its former employee, Jorge Melendez (hereinafter “Appellee” or “Melendez”) in a worker’s compensation retaliation and breach of contract suit. In three issues, Appellant challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the jury verdict on retaliation, th... More... $0 (11-22-2013 - TX) |
Tonia Denise J. Royal v. CCC&R Tres Arboles, L.L.C. |
We learn from this Title VII appeal that Tonia Royal worked at an apartment complex for only four days before she was fired by defendant CCC&R. During this brief time, she was regularly visited in her small office by two maintenance men who hovered over her and sniffed her in a sexually suggestive manner. When she complained to her superiors about this behavior, she was then fired for unspecific r... More... $0 (11-21-2013 - TX) |
Maisha I. Hamilton v. Village of Oak Lawn, Illinois |
Allan Lorincz, a man in his mid‐80s retired from the University of Chicago Medical Center, where he had been a distinguished dermatologist, was dying of Parkinson’s disease in the spring of 2010 when, according to the plaintiff, Maisha Hamilton, he hired her to help him in his home with various “end‐of‐life tasks.” She was a friend of a wayward daughter of Lorincz. A defrocked physicia... More... $0 (11-20-2013 - IL) |
H. Mehrdad Sageghi v. Sharp Memorial Medical Center Chula Vista |
Dr. H. Mehrdad Sadeghi's medical staff privileges were summarily suspended by the Medical Staff of Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center (SCV). Dr. Sadeghi appeals from |
Tony Sayger v. Riceland Foods, Inc. |
Tony Sayger brought this action against Riceland Foods under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII, the Arkansas Civil Rights Act, and other statutes, alleging retaliatory discharge after being a witness in an internal investigation into a complaint about a manager. After the district court 1 granted summary judgment to Riceland on Sayger's Title VII and ACRA claims, his § 1981 claim proceeded to trial. T... More... $0 (11-18-2013 - AR) |
Dena Winslow v. Northern Maine Development Commission, Inc. |
Dena Winslow appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Northern Maine Development Commission, Inc. ("NMDC") on her claim that NMDC's failure to hire her when it became the fiscal agent for the Workforce Investment Act grant constituted whistleblower retaliation under the Maine Whistleblowers' Protection Act ("MWPA"), Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 831 et seq. We agre... More... $0 (11-18-2013 - ME) |
Guadalupe Batencourt v. Atwood Distributing Company |
Guadalupe Batencourt sued Atwood Distributing Company on an American With Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 121001, violation theory. |
Vickie Checotah v. Inverness Village |
Vickie Checotah sued Inverness Village on a wrongful termination theory claiming: |
ESMA Etienne v. Spanish Lake Truck & Casino Plaza, LLC |
Plaintiff–Appellant Esma Etienne appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on her claims that Defendant–Appellee Spanish Lake Truck & Casino Plaza, L.L.C. (Spanish Lake) discriminated against her on the basis of race by failing to promote her and retaliated against her for filing a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). We affirm in par... More... $0 (11-13-2013 - LA) |
Kawaljeet K. Tagore v. United States of America |
Kawaljeet Tagore (“Tagore”) was refused permission to wear a kirpan (a Sikh ceremonial sword) with a blade long enough to be considered a “dangerous weapon” under federal law inside the federal building where she worked for the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). She lost her job by failing to comply with the applicable regulations or receive an appropriate waiver. Tagore sued the United... More... $0 (11-13-2013 - TX) |
State of Utah v. Martin MacNeill |
The State of Utah charged Dr. Martin MacNeill with first-degree murder and obstruction of justice in conjunction with the bathtub drowning death of his wife. The State alleged that Defendant gave his wife Michelle drugs and then placed her in a bathtub where she drown, possibly with some help from her husband. Defendant, a doctor and lawwyer, had eight children and was a former bishop of his loca... More... $0 (11-09-2013 - UT) |
Mark D. Volpei v. County of ventura |
An employee is a member of a union whose collective bargaining agreement provides that the union may submit a grievance to arbitration. Here we conclude that this provision does not preclude the employee with a statutory grievance against his employer from filing a judicial action. |
Michael L. Lobato v. State of New Mexico |
Michael Lobato was a probationary employee at the New Mexico Environmental Department’s Farmington office. His status as a probationary employee meant he could be fired at will and without a right to appeal the decision, so long as the department’s reasons were provided in writing. Before completing his probationary period, Lobato was fired. In a letter explaining its decision, NMED cited Loba... More... $0 (11-05-2013 - NM) |
Next Page |