| United States of America v. Ryan R. Vandyke |
|
Pocatello, Idaho, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm by a prohibited person. |
| State of Oregon v. Benjamin Guthrie Koteen |
|
McMinnville, Oregon, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010. |
| United States of America v. Kirill Afanasyev |
|
San Francisco, California, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud. |
| United States of America v. James L. Hattten, II |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking a minor in violation of 18 U.S. 1591. |
| United States of America v. Nicholas G. Brown |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud. $0 (11-07-2025 - NE) |
| Justin Hooper v. The City of Tulsa |
|
Justin Hooper and the City of Tulsa dispute whether the Curtis Act, 30 Stat. 495 (1898), grants Tulsa jurisdiction over municipal violations committed by all Tulsa’s inhabitants, including Indians, in Indian country. Tulsa issued a traffic citation to Mr. Hooper, an Indian and member of the Choctaw Nation, and he paid a $150 fine for the ticket in Tulsa’s Municipal Criminal Court (“municipal $0 (06-28-2023 - OK) |
| CITY OF TULSA, Appellant v. NICHOLAS RYAN O'BRIEN, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellee, Nicholas Ryan O'Brien, was charged by Information in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa with the following misdemeanor traffic crimes: |
| United States of America v. Corey Ray Fields |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. |
| Christine M. Arnold v. Ameren Illinois Company |
|
East St. Louis, Illinois, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff. |
| United States of America v. Matthew Ramos-Soto |
|
Madison, Wisconsin, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, see 18 |
| United States of America v. Charles “Chuck” Wright, Amos Durham, Lawson B. Watson |
|
Spartanburg, South Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit theft. |
| Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v, D.V. |
|
Austin, Texas, family law lawyer represent Defendant in a parental termination action. |
| State of Colorado v. John Hallford and Carie Hallford |
|
Colorado Springs, Colorado criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with fraud. |
| United States of America v. C.R. Kraus, a/k/a Christopher Kraus |
|
Newark, New Jersey, riminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with healthcare fraud, conspiracy to commit the same, and tax evasion. |
| United States of America v. |
|
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stealing checks out of the mail. |
| Alicia Rowe v. State Mutual Insurance Company |
|
Belfast, Maine insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who brought a reach-and-apply action that Rowe brought pursuant to 24-A M.R.S. § 2904 (2019).[1] See Ashe v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2003 ME 147, ¶ 14, 838 A.2d 1157 ("The reach and apply statute . . . enables a judgment creditor to have insurance money applied to the satisfaction of [a] judgment by bringing an action against the judgment debt $0 (09-30-2025 - ME) |
| Randy Ball v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Manchester and others. |
|
Concord, New Hampshire, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence theory. |
| Christopher B. Norman v. Tranam Systems International, Inc. and Masaru Brook Iwata |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a fraud theory. |
| United States of America v. Peter Bardunias |
|
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Attempted Enticement of a Minor. |
| The State of Oklahoma v. In the Matter of L.M., an alleged Deprived Child.Rebecca Mireles and James Moody |
|
Durant, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Defendants in a termination of parental rights case. |
| United States of America v. Tania Cesar |
|
Miami, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit health care fraud and wire fraud and 5 counts of health care fraud. |
| United States of America v. Leonard Brown, aka Bo |
|
Miami, Florida pro se plaintiff, without the help of a lawyer, sent a letter to the judge asking for the appoint of a laywer to help him with an application for a sentenced reduction under the First Step Act. The District court denied his application. |
| United States of America v. Clonet Junior Charmant |
|
Tallahassee, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempt and conspiracy to commit fail fraud and bank fraud. |
| United States of America v. Sharon Toney‑Finch a |
|
New York, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Wire Fraud And Stolen Valor. |
| United States of America v. Byron Cordell Thomas |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of sex |
|
Next Page |