Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful reentry of a deported alien
Honduran National Sentenced to Six Months in Prison for Illegal Reentry

Port Charlotte, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

* * *

Florida Premises liability law summary
Florida Premises Liability Law Summary:
1. General Principle:

Property owners in Florida have a legal duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition to prevent injuries to la

Fort Myers, Florida insurance lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

* * *

Florida Bad Faith Insurance Law: Summary
In Florida, an insurance company can be held liable for "bad faith" when it fails to act in good faith towards its insured in handling a claim. This means the insurer doesn't meet its legal or contractual

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Obstructing, Delaying, and Affecting Commerce by Robbery; Forfeiture Allegation in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 which provides:

Which prohibits actual or attempted robbery or extortion affecting interstate or foreign commerce. Section 1951 also proscribes conspiracy to commit robbery or extortion wit

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Drug conspiracy in and maintaining a drug involved premises.

21 U.S.C. 846 provides:

Section 846 of Title 21 prohibits conspiracies and attempts to violate any substantive offense established by Subchapter I of Title 21 ("Control and Enforcement")—in other words, Section 846 makes it a cri

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Gary Wood represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343.

* * *

The elements of wire fraud under Section 1343 directly parallel those of the mail fraud statute, but require the use of an interstate tel

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Possession of a firearm AFCF in violation of 21 O.S.C. 1283, which provide:

A. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, it shall be unlawful for any person convicted of any felony in any court of this state or of another state or of the United States to have in his or her possession or un

Springfield, Massachusetts insurance law lawyers represented the parties in beach of contract action.

* * *

In Massachusetts, a breach of an insurance contract occurs when an insurer fails to fulfill its obligations under the policy. This can involve wrongfully denying a claim, failing to investigate a claim reasonably, or not settling a claim when liability is clear. Such breach

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement by a bank employe and aggravated identity theft.

* * *

18 U.S.C. § 656 is a federal law that criminalizes embezzlement, misapplication of funds, or theft by individuals connected with banks, including officers, directors, agents, or employees. It applies to a variety of financial in

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a medical malpractice theory.

* * *

Colorado medical malpractice law summary

1. What is Medical Malpractice in Colorado?

Medical malpractice, also known as medical negligence, occurs when a healthcare provider fails to meet the accepted "standard of care" while treating a patient, resulting

Denver, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1), which provides:

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is a federal law that prohibits certain individuals from possessing firearms or ammunition
. This law is part of the Gun Control Act (GCA).
Who is Prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)?
Th

Denver, Colorado insurance law lawyers represent the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on bad faith beach of insurance contract theories.

* * *

colorado bad faith breach of insurance contract law

In Colorado, insurance companies have a legal duty to act in good faith and deal fairly with their policyholders

. If an insurer unreasonably denies, delays, or underpay

Denver, Colorado insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

In Colorado, an insured party can sue an insurance company for bad faith breach of an insurance contract, which occurs when an insurer unreasonably delays or denies a valid claim. This can involve both statutory and common law claims, potentially leading to the recovery of m

Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy to
obstruct commerce by robbery and multiple counts of obstruction of commerce by robbery.

For nearly a year and a half, Russell and Williams committed a series of armed commercial robberies throughout Chicago. They were eventually indicted for conspiracy to obstruct commerce by robbery in v

Knoxville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability negligence theory.

In Tennessee, premises liability law holds property owners and those who control property responsible for injuries resulting from unsafe conditions. Owners have a duty to maintain their property in a reasonably safe condition and to warn visitors of any known hazards. This mean

Chattanooga, Tennessee insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff in a bad faith breach of insurance contract case.

Plaintiff was hired by SIAG Aerisyin ("SIAG Aerisyn"), LLC, a producer of steel towers located in Chattanooga, Tennessee, on March 28, 2011 (Admin. R. at 115). SIAG Aerisyin provided Plaintiff healthcare insurance under a Group Policy ("the Plan"), which Defendant admini

Columbus, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with armed robbery.

Ohio's jail-time-credit statute, R.C. 2967.191, requires that the State of Ohio credit an offender for the time he spent in confinement prior to sentencing. Another statute, the judicial-release statute, R.C. 2929.20, allows a trial court to reduce the nonmandatory prison term of an eligible offen

Beaufordt, South Carolina civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Title IX theory alleging
that Appellee failed to appropriately respond to her reports of sexual abuse and harassment while she was a student.

Title IX prohibits sex discrimination by recipients of federal education funding. The statute provides that “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the b

Anderson, South Carolina insurance lawyer lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking restoration of long-term disability benefits.

Penland stopped working in August 2015 following complications from colon surgery and various other conditions. He pplied for long-term disability benefits from his employer, and in February 2016, those benefits were approved. Under the terms of his employer’s

Atlanta, Georgia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

On October 18, 2017, the FBI raided the wrong house in suburban At-
lanta. Officers meant to execute search and arrest warrants at a sus-
pected gang hideout at 3741 Landau Lane but instead stormed 3756
Denville Trace, a quiet family home occupied by peti

San Francisco, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Embezzling Over $9 Million From Company
Former CFO Of Sf Seafood Wholesaler Convicted For Embezzling Over $9 Million From Company

San Francisco, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with 15 counts of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft
Alameda Man Indicted On Charges Stemming From Theft Of $800,000 From Prepaid Debit Cards

Tampa, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school.

* * *

Legal issue Is an appellant's sentence as a habitual felony offender legally valid when one of the prior felony convictions is for possession of cocaine under Florida law?
Headnote

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. HABITUAL FELONY OFFENDER SENTEN

Fort Lauderdale, Florida insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

In Florida, bad faith actions against insurers are governed by Florida Statute 624.155. This statute allows a policyholder to sue an insurer for damages caused by the insurer's failure to act in good faith in settling a claim. Bad faith claims often arise w

Fort Lauderdale, Florida insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

In Florida, a bad faith breach of an insurance contract occurs when an insurer acts dishonestly or unreasonably in failing to fulfill its contractual obligations, such as denying a valid claim, delaying payments, or underpaying a claim. Florida law recognizes both fir