Atlanta, Georgia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a product liability claim.

New York City, New York civil litigation lawyers represented the Defendants on a Clean Air Action violation theory.

This case presents two principal questions. The first is whether the government has adequately alleged that the “EZ Lynk System,” a product manufactured and sold by Appellees Thomas Wood and Bradley Gintz through their company, Appellee EZ Lynk, SEZC, is a “defeat devi

Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a product liability claim.

Mobile, Alabama pro se Plaintiffs attempted to represent themselves with a lawyer in an employment discrimination case.

Ms. Brown is a former Walmart employee. Her twin
brother, Mr. Brown, has power of attorney over her estate. To-
gether, the Browns brought twelve claims against two Walmart
executives, CEO Carl McMillon and CFO John Rainey, for alleged
offenses that occur

Miami, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a slip and fall claim.

On May 26, 2022, while walking toward the entrance of a dining
area on Carnival’s Horizon cruise ship, Scott encountered a Carni-
val employee who advised Scott to take an alternate route due to a
large amount of water on the pool deck. Upon entering the area
into which he was direc

Tahlequah, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

1. FALSELY PERSONATE ANOTHER TO CREATE LIABILITY

2. OBSTRUCTING AN OFFICER

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a produce liability claim.

Plaintiff, a foreign citizen, who had a medical device implanted in the United Kingdom but later surgically removed in the United States, sued the device’s manufacturer, which was based in Minnesota during the time of the complained-of conduct, and the manufacturer’s parent company, w

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Alleged Controlled Substance Act Violations
Lubbock Cardiologist Agrees to Pay $1.2 Million to Resolve Alleged Controlled Substance Act Violations

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with liability allegations under the False Claims Act.
Allentown-Area Pharmacy and Its Owner Agree to Pay $825,000 to Resolve Allegations of False Claims Act Liability

Anchorage, Alaska insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was initially filed in the State of Alaska, Third Judicial District, 3AN-25-04081, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In Alaska, insurance bad faith occurs when an insurer unreasonably denies or delays payment of a valid claim

Richland, Washington personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a product liability theory.

* * *

Washington product liability law, governed by the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA), addresses injuries caused by defective products. It establishes that manufacturers and sellers can be held liable for harm if a product is not "reasonably safe" due to design flaws, m

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Allegations of False Claims Act Liability
Allentown-Area Pharmacy and Its Owner Agree to Pay $825,000 to Resolve Allegations of False Claims Act Liability

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented the PlaintiffS who sued on intentional infliction of emotional distress theories.

Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants were liable under this state law claim because their actions “in making or contributing to the making of false reports of abuse to DCS were extreme and outrageous.” However, Arizona’s mandatory reporting statute req

Las Vegas, Nevada employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

A jury found: (1) an incident was severe or pervasive and objectively and subjectively offensive to a reasonable
person; but that (2) the incident was not motivated by race or gender; (3) the City did not discriminate against Lister in violation of Title VII; and (4) the City di

New Haven, Connecticut criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating the federal and state False Claims Acts
APRN and Medical Practice to Pay Over $600k and Cease Connecticut Medicaid Participation to Settle False Claims Act Allegations

Jefferson City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a product liability wrongful death theory.

In May 2020, a fire started in the engine of a recreational power boat (the “Pajivo”) on the Lake of the Ozarks, causing an explosion that injured passenger Lauren Wilken and killed passenger Shawn Carroll. This appeal concerns the consequent suit brought by the Carr

New York, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a products liability claims.

Class action Plaintiffs sued the Defendants seeking to recover damages in connection with personal injuries allegedly caused by consumption of French Lentil _ Leek Cumbles manufactured by Stone Gate Foods and distributed and sold by Daily Harvest.

Washington, DC criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating the Consumer Product Safety Act
New Jersey Company Pleads Guilty and Agrees to Restitution and Civil Penalty for Failing to Report Dangerous Air Conditioners

Buffalo, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

Beckley, Personal Injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on negligence theories.

The question presented in this case is whether the discretionary function exclusion from the tortious activity exception of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”) precludes federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over claims against the Holy See concerning child sexual

Miami, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability wrongful death theory.

This matter arose from a collision that occurred in Key Largo, Florida. George McGee owned a 2019 Tesla Model S (“Vehicle”) “equipped with automatic driving features, one of which Tesla termed ‘Autopilot,’ that could navigate without driver input.” ECF No. [2

Huntsville, Alabama personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on an auto negligence claims.

* * *

Alabama follows a contributory negligence rule in auto accident cases, meaning that if a driver is even 1% at fault for an accident, they cannot recover damages from another party, even if the other party was primarily responsible. This is a strict rule, and unlike many other

Anchorage, Alaska personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

* * *

In Alaska, premises liability law dictates that property owners have a duty to maintain a reasonably safe environment for lawful visitors and can be held responsible for injuries caused by hazardous conditions on their property. This means they must address