St. Louis, Missouri criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Pandemic Fraud, Witness Tampering, Clean Air Act Violations
Missouri Man Sentenced to 108 Months in Prison for $3 Million Pandemic Fraud, Witness Tampering, Clean Air Act Violations

Wagoner, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:


1. FALSELY PERSONATE ANOTHER TO CREATE LIABILITY
2. POSS OF CDS
3. UNLAWFUL POSS OF DRUG PARA
4. DRIVING WITH LICENSE CANCELLED/SUSPENDED/REVOKED
5. OPERATING VEHICLE WITH EXPIRED/IMPROPER TAG/DECAL
6. FAILURE TO PAY TAXES DUE STATE

Baton Rouge, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Bank Fraud Conspiracy and Violating Supervised Release
Mississippi Man Sentenced for Bank Fraud Conspiracy and Violating Supervised Release

Enid, Oklahoma criminal law defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with: FALSELY PERSONATE ANOTHER TO CREATE LIABILITY, in violation of 21 O.S. 1531; POSSESSION OF FIREARM AFTER FORMER FELONY CONVICTION, in violation of 21 O.S. 1283(A); POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE (METHAMPHAETAMINE), in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402; and UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA, in violation

Santa Ana, California civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract dispute.

Banyan Limited Partnership (Banyan), Pear Tree Limited Partnership (Pear Tree), Orange Blossom Limited Partnership (Orange Blossom), and Apple Orchard Limited Partnership (Apple Orchard) are Nevada limited partnerships. Apple Management Services, LLC, (Apple Management) is a Texas limit

Traverse City, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff governmental tort claim negligence theories.

This case arises out of a series of events that occurred in the years preceding Mardelle's death in May 2022. Plaintiffs filed a lengthy verified complaint in January 2023, followed by an amended verified complaint in February 2023, in which they named as defendants Brenda

Stillwater, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Violation of Protective Order, Second & Subsequent Offense, AFCF, in violation of 22 O.S. 60.6. which provides:



A. Except as otherwise provided by this section, any person who:

1. Has been served with an emergency temporary, ex parte or final protective order or foreign protective order

New York City, New York civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract dispute.

The Plaintiff sued the Defendant on breach of contract and common-law indemnification law theories.

A common-law indemnification claimant must prove that it was not only not guilty of any negligence beyond the the statutory liability but must also prove that [Beeche] was guil

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

Anna Andrews was injured in an accident involving three vehicles. She and her husband sued the other drivers, Alexandra Fox and John McAlpine, as well as Freeway Motors, McAlpine's employer. Andrews[1] had underinsured motorist coverage through Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exc

Austin, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff in an auto negligence case.

In April 2014, Magdaleno Villegas was injured in an automobile collision with Arellano, who was intoxicated at the time. See Old Am. Cnty. Mut. Fire Ins. v. Villegas, No. 01-17-00750-CV, 2019 WL 3121853, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] July 16, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.).[1] Villegas

Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Multi-Million Dollar Tax Evasion Scheme
U.S. Attorney's Office Secures Final Sentencing of Trio Which Orchestrated a Multi-Million Dollar Tax Evasion Scheme

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a controlled drug - Meth in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402.

TRAUMA CARE ASSISTANCE REVOLVING FUND
$ 100.00
COURT COSTS ON MISDEMEANOR
$ 83.00
DA COUNCIL PROSECUTION ASSESSMENT FOR MISDEMEANOR
$ 30.00
OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
$ 25.00
CLEET PE

Tampa, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with second-degree murder and attempted second-degree murder.

Defendant was found guilty as a principal in the commission of the crime.

"[I]n order to be a principal in a crime, one must have a conscious intent that the crime be done and must do some act or say some word which was intended to and does

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights theory.
forceable and unambiguous. We therefore affirm.

Mr. Osterhout was badly beaten during a traffic stop by Mr. Morgan, the
former Undersheriff of LeFlore County. Mr. Osterhout filed suit seeking damages
from Mr. Morgan under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive use of force. At trial

Monet, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence claims.

First Baptist Chruch of Pierce City, Missouri, is a Southern Baptist church and that Plaintiff participated in FBC's youth ministries program. A youth pastor led FBC's youth ministries program and transported participants, including Plaintiff and others, to and from said program in a church van. On tw

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a legal malpractice theory.

On January 28, 2015, Edward was discharged from Loyola University Medical Center (Loyola) following a heart transplant. Per Loyola's discharge instructions, Lynn gave a dosage of insulin to Edward later that evening. However, Edward had already received the same dosage earlier in the

Chicago, Illinois civil litigation lawyers will be representing United States of America qui tam claim against Walgreen claiming that it filled millions of unlawful prescriptions in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and then sought reimbursement for many of these prescriptions from various federal health care programs in violation the False Claims Act (FCA). Walgreens is one of the

Topeka, KS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with claiming a jury instruction contained an alternative-means error

Detroit, Michigan civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a qui tam theory.


In some circumstances, “an individual who has incurred medical expenses can lawfully
seek recovery from more than one insurer.” United States ex rel. Angelo v. Allstate Ins. Co., 106
F.4th 441, 445 (6th Cir. 2024). This is also true when one of those insurers is Medicare. I

Mankato, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a wrongful death claim.

Following a one-vehicle accident that happened at work and resulted in the death of the vehicle's passenger, that person's next of kin brought a wrongful-death action against the driver and the driver's parents who owned the vehicle. The district court determined that the driver was immune from

Hartford, Connecticut personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence theory.

The plaintiffs commenced the present action in December, 2022. In count four of the complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant[3] ''owned, leased, rented, controlled, possessed, operated, managed, and/ or maintained the premises at 61 Savitt Way, Hartford,'' which is known as the Xfin

Tamps, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a violation of 18 U.S. 2255.

When C.H. was eleven years old, a stranger connected with her through Omegle.com, an online social media platform that places people in video chatrooms. The stranger then tricked and threat-
ened C.H. into making child pornography. Unfortunately, this problem is not unique to Omegle.com. Ou

Portland, Oregon constitutional law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who challenged Oregon's privacy law.

Project Veritas and Project Veritas Action Fund (collectively, “Project Veritas”) argue that an Oregon
statute prohibiting unannounced recordings of oral conversations violates the First Amendment. Project Veritas
brings as-applied and facial challenges. It contends that

Dallas, Texas civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a fraud theory.

Copeland, a Louisiana citizen, sued Ostler in a California federal
district court alleging that Ostler had fraudulently obtained a judgment lien
against Copeland that his brokerage firm, E*Trade, satisfied more than a
decade ago. The California district court issued, and Copeland served