United States of America v. Travis Ford |
Lincoln, Nebraska criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with making multiple threatening posts on an Instagram page associated with an election official. |
United States of America v. Jason Metz |
New Haven, Connecticut criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with distributing heroin, fentanyl, cocaine and crack. |
United States of America v. Twitter, Inc. |
San Francisco, California telecommunications law lawyers represented Defendant charged with violating the FTC Act. |
United States of America v. Alessandro Doreus, Jean Elie Doreus Jovin, and Djouman Doreus |
Orlando, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with conspiracy to possess an unauthorized access device. |
State of Oklahoma v. Vernon Lee Shaver |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense attorney represented Defendant, charged with: |
United States of America v. Robert Rodriguez |
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense attorney represented defendant charged with selling controlled substances in violation of 18 U.S.C. §841 |
United States of America v. Ilir Bregu |
|
C.D. on behalf of T.D. v. Warren Hills Regional Board of Education |
Trenton, New Jersey civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Handicapped Child Act violation theory. |
Carolyn Catalano v. Infinity Solar Systems, LLC |
White Plains, New York consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiff, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, who sued Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violation theory. |
United States of America v. SALLY LÓPEZ MARTÍNEZ |
offenses relating to public corruption involving the awarding of contracts to entities affiliated with Hernández by ADL, AAA, and the Puerto Rico House of Representatives charges. |
Bob Dawson, et al. v. Porch.com, Inc., et al. |
Seattle, WA: Consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227) violations. |
Jay Winegard v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc., d/b/a The Wall Street Journal |
Brooklyn, New York civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on n Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory. |
United States of America v. Nizar Farhat |
Los Angeles, California criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant who was charged with bribery. |
Matthew Hufaus v. DoNoPay, Inc. |
San Francisco, California consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theories under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides: |
STATE OF OHIO v. KEENA WILLIAMS |
Cleveland, Ohio - Criminal defense attorney represented Kenna Williams with a 13-count indictment, charging him with aggravated burglary in specification and a repeat violent offender specification (Count 1); assault (Count 2); criminal damaging or endangering (Count 3); theft (Count 4); petty theft (Count 5); improperly discharging a firearm into a habitation ... More... $0 (06-17-2021 - OH)
|
United States of America v. Leelynn Danielle Chytka |
Abingdon, Virginia mail fraud and aggravated identity theft charge criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Leelynn Danielle Chytka, age 31. |
STATE OF OHIO v. KENNETH RICHEY |
Lima, OH - Criminal defense attorney represented Kenneth T. Richey with aggravated murder and aggravated arson charge.{¶2} Randall Basinger (“Basinger”) worked as an assistant prosecutor in Putnam County in between 1981 and 1987. Tr. 312. In 1986, Basinger became the lead prosecutor in a case that resulted in Ri... More... $0 (06-06-2021 - OH) |
David A. Barry v. Signify Health, L.L.C. |
Dallas, Texas consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violation theory. |
Britney Blackmon v. Tower Loan of Mississippi LLC, d/b/a Tower Loan |
Tuscaloosa, Alabama pro se litigant sued Defendant on a Telecommunications Act of 1996 violation theory.... More... $0 (05-21-2021 - AL) |
State of Oklahoma v. HAMILTON, ADRIAN DUANE |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, charged with: |
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. SARAH ELIZABETH CHARLES, Defendant. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, charged with: |
Stewart Smith v. Independence Holding Company |
New Haven, Connecticut consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides: |
Kelly Schultz v. TheMLSonline, Inc. |
Minneapolis, Minnesota consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued TheMLSonline, Inc. on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227 which provides: |
STATE OF OHIO VS. SIERRA SMITH |
Cincinnati, Ohio - Criminal defense attorney represented Sierra Smith with a telecommunications harassment chargePrompted by jealousy, a relational turf war resulted in a telecommunications harassment conviction after defendant-appellant Sierra Smith launched a threatening Facebook message to her boyfriend’s ex. On a... More... $0 (05-02-2021 - OH) |
STATE OF OHIO vs. KEVIN ROBERSON |
Cincinnati, Ohio - Criminal defense attorney represented Kevin Roberson with appealing the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court’s judgment overruling his 2020 “Motion to Vacate Void Judicial Sanction.”{¶2} In 2016, in the case numbered B-1505520, Roberson was convicted upon guilty pleas to attempted felonious assault a... More... $0 (05-01-2021 - OH) |
Next Page |