| United States of America v. Quavon Hires |
|
Miami, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violation of supervised release. |
| United States of America v. Cristhian Ortega-Lopez |
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with alien in possession of a firearm and ammunition and conspiracy to tamper with evidence. |
| United States of America v. Hector Miranda-Mendoza |
|
Portland, Oregon criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Aiming a Laser at a Customs and Border Protection Helicopter. |
| Virgal DRM, LLC v. Ressler Motor Company |
|
Butte, Montana, intellectual property lawyers represented the parties in a trademark infringement dispute. |
| United States of America v. Jonathan Rinderknecht, a.k.a. “Jonathan Rinder,†and “Jon Rinder,†|
|
Los Angeles, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with destruction of property by means of fire. |
| United States of America v. Abdisatar Ahmed Hassan |
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Attempting to Provide Material Support and Resources to a Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Samuel Rayfael Burks and Sam J. Agree |
|
Bartlesville, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with robbery with a firearm. |
| United States of America v. Marimar Martinez, Anthony Ian Santos Ruiz |
|
Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Using Their Vehicles to Assault, Impede, and Interfere with the Work of Federal Agents in Chicago . |
| Craig Kimmel v. iHeartmedia, Inc. |
|
San Antonio, Texas, consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment violation theory. |
| Cayla Vick v. Credit One Bank, NA, et al. |
|
San Antonio, Texas consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation. $0 (10-03-2025 - TX) |
| State of Oklahoma v. D.M.T. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with using technology to engate in sexual communctions with a minor in violation of 21 O.S. 1040.13.a. |
| United States of America v. John C. Nivison |
|
Bangor, Maine criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with failing to report his arrival and present himself for inspection |
| State of New York v. Donald Ziebenhood |
|
New York City, New York, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of Burglary in the First Degree, two counts of Burglary in the Second Degree, one count of Assault in the Second Degree, two counts of Aggravated Criminal Contempt, eight counts of Criminal Contempt in the First Degree, and one count of Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree. |
| United States of America v. David Cornejo Fernandez |
|
Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Defrauding Spanish-Speaking US Consumers |
| United States of America v. Tochuwku Albert Nnebocha |
|
Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with operating a transnational inheritance fraud scheme. |
| Jennean Mason v. US Bank Trust Company, N.A. |
|
Concord, New Hampshire, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a bank fraud case. |
| Tom Daley, et al. v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. |
|
Burlington, Vermont consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a fraud theory. |
| John Conti, et al. v. Citizens Bank, N.A. |
|
Providence, Rhode Island, consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on banking law violations. |
| United States of America v. Jade Price |
|
South Bend, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud |
| United States of America v. Kamal Khalid, Fnu Shahrukh |
|
Baltimore, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy and conspiracy and securities fraud and odometer rollback scheme. |
| United States of America v. Gabriel Cowan Metcalf |
|
Billing, Montana, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violation of the Gun-Free School Zones Act, 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)(2)(A), |
| United States of America v. Crandall Speights |
|
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with filing false claims on government benefit programs |
| Judah Rosenwald, et al. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation |
|
San Francisco, California, consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on class action theory. |
| United States of America v. Joseph Osei, a/k/a/ “Kyngjo,†|
|
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with a fraudulent scheme to obtain COVID-19 pandemic-related unemployment insurance benefits using stolen identities. |
| Julie A. Tamm and Rosannea M. Przybylski v. Milan Nerad |
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued Count I—First Amendment Retaliation (42 U.S.C. § 1983) (official and personal capacity); Count II—Llewellyn Preemption (state-law claim); Count III— Reasonableness Challenge – Square Lake (state-law claim); Count IV—Selective Enforcement Equal Protection) (§ 1983) (official an $0 (09-25-2025 - MI) |
|
Next Page |