Austin, Texas pro se Plaintiff sued asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the
Americans with Disabilities Act, and Texas state law, and its imposition of a
pre-filing injunction.... More...   $0 (08-04-2025 - TX)

San Antonio, Texas pro se Plaintiff sued on a job discrimination theory.

42 U.S. Code § 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations.

Here's a breakdown of key aspects:
More...   $0 (08-04-2025 - TX)

Richmond, Virginia consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.

Parties sometimes agree to resolve disputes between them in private arbitration instead of litigating in state or federal court. The Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to honor such an agreement when a party seeks to enforce it, so long as a binding contract to arbitrate ... More...   $0 (08-04-2025 - VA)

Providence, Rhode Island personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory.

he Naval Undersea Warfare Center ("the Warfare Center"), a division of the U.S. Navy focused on the research and development of submersible weapons systems, asked Appellant Matthew Waleyko to resign at the end of his two-year term of probationary employment. After his ter... More...   $0 (07-31-2025 - MI)

Miami, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Helms-Burton Act.
See 22 U.S.C. § 6021 et seq. Title III of the Act created a private right of action for United States nationals to sue third parties who trafficked in confiscated property.

. For over 20 years,
Title III remained dormant because its right of action was sus-
pended b... More...   $0 (07-31-2025 - FL)

Las Vegas, Nevada consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.

The Act (Title VI of the Consumer Credit Protection Act) protects information collected by consumer reporting agencies such as credit bureaus, medical information companies and tenant screening services. Information in a consumer report cannot be provided to anyone... More...   $0 (07-29-2025 - NV)

Phoenix, Arizona real property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a quite title theory.

In 2006, Charley Johnson, on behalf of his trust, bought
about 21 acres bordering the Tonto National Forest in Gila
County, Arizona. The parcel came with a house, barn,
saddle house, well, corrals, and other ranch-related
improvements that the previous landowner built in the<... More...   $0 (07-28-2025 - AZ)

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sexual exploitation of minors.

(a) Any person who—

(1) knowingly transports or ships using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means including by computer or mails, any visual depiction, if—

(A) the producing ... More...   $0 (07-25-2025 - IA)

Urbana, Illinois employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

* * *

Federal civil rights laws prohibit employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity), national origin, age (40 and over), disability, and genetic information. These laws apply to various aspects ... More...   $1 (07-25-2025 - IL)

Indianapolis, Indiana employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who claiming job discrimination.

Timothy Upchurch is a Black Correctional Officer at CIF. First hired
in 1994 as an Officer, he was promoted to Sergeant in Novem-
ber 2007 and Lieutenant in September 2015. In January 2019,
Warden Wendy Knight demoted him two levels.

His demotion back to an Officer p... More...   $0 (07-25-2025 - IN)

Charlotte, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of possessing a firearm as an illegal alien. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5).

Solis-Rodriguez grew up in Honduras. Having unlawfully entered the United States, he was deported in 2018. He then reentered—again unlawfully.

In August 2020, Solis-Rodriguez entered a Charlotte, North Carol... More...   $0 (07-23-2025 - NC)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

STALKING, in violation of 21 O.S. 1173:

A. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person in a manner that:

1. Would cause a reasonable person or a member of the immediate family of that person as defined in subsection F of this section to feel fr... More...   $0 (07-22-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

FALSE DECLARATION OF OWNERSHIP IN PAWN, in violation of 59 O.S. 1512(C)(2):

2. Any person selling or pledging property to a pawnbroker who uses false or altered identification or a false declaration of ownership as related to the provisions of Section 1515 of this title shall, if the value of the pro... More...   $0 (07-21-2025 - OK)

New York, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged withconspiracy to distribute and to possess with he intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of Title 21, U.S. Code, Sections 959(c), 959(d), and 963.

This case arises from a multi-year international narcotics trafficking conspiracy in which Landji and Adamu used a private aircraft to t... More...   $0 (07-21-2025 - NY)

New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Transportation of Stolen Property and Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property
California Residents Guilty of Conspiracy to Commit Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property and Interstate Transporta... More...   $0 (07-18-2025 - LA)

Laguna Niguel and San Diego, California criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with exporting military equipment from the United States to Lybia including acquiring, transporting, and use of surface-to-air missiles in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g.

After undercover federal agents conducted a sting
operation in which Defendant Rami Ghanem sought to
export mili... More...   $0 (07-17-2025 - CA)

Little Rock, Arkansas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a First Amendment violation theory.

Two students alleged an Arkansas law violates their rights under the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause because they claim it prohibits their teachers from providing classroom materials and instruction about Critical Race Theory (CRT).
Concluding the law likely violated the ... More...   $0 (07-17-2025 - AR)

Omaha, Nebraska employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a sex discrimination theory.

In March 2019, Beran was hired to work as a certified nursing assistant at Linden Court, a
skilled nursing facility. Linden Court is owned by the defendant, VSL North Platte
Court, LLC, and we will refer to the appellant as Linden Court.

In December 2019... More...   $0 (07-17-2025 - NE)