Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Nathan Miller represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury to property less than $1,000 in violation of f 21 O.S. 1760(A)(1), which provides:

A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is gu

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unauthorized use of a credit/dbit care in violation of 21 O.S. 1660.29, which provides:

A person who, with intent to defraud (a) the issuer, (b) a person or organization providing money, goods, services or anything else of value, or (c) any other person, uses for the purpose of obtaining money, goods, services

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: LMFR, LARCENY OF MERCHANDISE FROM RETAILER, in violation of 21 O.S. 1731
Date of Offense: 08/23/2023
PANNEBAKER, JONATHON WAYNE
Disposed: DEFERRED, 01/07/2025. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: LARCENY OF MERCHANDISE FROM RETAILER(LMFR)
Violation of 21 O.S. 1

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a stolen vehicle in violation of 47 O.S. 4-103, which provides:




A. A person not entitled to the possession of a vehicle who receives, possesses, conceals, sells, or disposes of it, knowing the vehicle to be stolen or converted under circumstances constituting a crime shall, upon co

Hastings, Minnesota civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a real property dispute.

The Sawyers and the Boland Trustees dispute ownership of an 8.5' by 117' strip of land on the east side of the Boland Trustees' property and the west side of the Sawyers' property (the Adverse Possession Parcel).

In 1966, the Boland family acquired property on Lake Marion (the Bolan

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, 2nd office, in violation of 47 O.S. 902, which provides:


A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, stree

Flemingsburg, Kentucky real property lawyers represented the parties in am adverse possession dispute.

The Wilkersons purchased property at 600 Helphenstine Road in Wallingford, Kentucky. The Wilkersons hired others to maintain the property (mowing and cutting hay) until they took up residence there in 2016.

The Babers live on an adjacent tract of one and one-half acres

Cincinnati, Ohio civil litigation lawyers represented the parties challenging net neutrality policies adopted by the FCC.

As Congress has said, the Internet has “flourished, to the benefit of all Americans, with a
minimum of government regulation.” 47 U.S.C. § 230(a)(4). The Federal Communications
Commission largely followed this command from the Telecommunications Act of 199

Peoria, IL criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit armed robbery and multiple robbery and firearms charges
Two Quad Cities Men Sentenced for Multiple Armed Robbery and Firearm Charges

Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with
Three Members of Violent National Gang Sentenced

Washington, DC criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Tax Evasion and Forcibly Retaking Property Seized Under Court Order
Former Utah Movie Producer Sentenced for Tax Evasion and Forcibly Retaking Property Seized Under Court Order

Tulsa, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

1. The phrase 'actual resident' and the word 'resident' as used in Title 12 O.S.1951, § 1272, as amended, contemplate an actual residence with substantially the same attributes as are intended when the word 'domicile' is used.

2. In determining a person's intentions as to his domicile, his acts and conduct

Peoria, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit armed robbery and multiple robbery and firearms charges
Two Quad Cities Men Sentenced for Multiple Armed Robbery and Firearm Charges

Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with RICO conspiracy, murder, drug trafficking, and weapons charges
Three Members of Violent National Gang Sentenced

New Orleans, LA criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Producing Child Sexual Abuse Videos
Jefferson Parish Man Sentenced to 25 Years Imprisonment for Producing Child Sexual Abuse Videos

Portland, Oregon real property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on wrongful taking and excessive fines theories.

Plaintiffs have ALLEGED viable takings and excessive fines claims under federal law and viable takings claims under Oregon law, and these claims are not barred by collateral estoppel or res judicata. As to the timeliness of these claims, this Court holds

New York City, New York civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiffs taking of private property without just compesnation theory.

In Tyler v. Hennepin County, 598 U.S. 631 (2023), the Supreme Court held that a county could be liable for taking private property without just compensation, in violation of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, where, after fore

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving while impaired in violation of 47 O.S. 761, which provides:


A. Any person who operates a motor vehicle while his ability to operate such motor vehicle is impaired by the consumption of alcohol, or any other substance, other than alcohol, which is capable of being ingested, inhaled, injected or abs

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with physical control of a vehicle while intoxicated in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A), which provides:
A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, streets, turn

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of meth in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402(A)(1), which provides:

A. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to possess a controlled dangerous substance unless such substance was obtained directly, or pursuant to a valid prescription or order from a practitioner, while acting in

Dallas, Texas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who contested the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act.

Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act provides “an individual shall not, on the ground[s] prohibited under” any of four civil rights statutes, “be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any health

Fayetteville, Arkansas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who challenged the constitutionality of an Arkansas law.

On June 2, 2023, a coalition of public libraries, library organizations, professional
librarians, library patrons, booksellers, patrons of bookstores, booksellers’ associations,
and authors’ associations challenged the constitutionality of Sections 1

Roanoke, Virginia employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a violation of Virginia's retaliatory discharged law, Va. Code Ann. §§ 40.1-27.3 and 40.1-51.2:1 (2023. . Cook alleged that RESCO terminated his employment based on his protected act of reporting a potential
safety violation in the workplace.


Virginia Code § 40.1-27.3, Virginia’s whistleblower sta