David Fisher, d/b/a A-1 Power Tongs and Casing Crews, et al. v. The United States of America |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory. |
Quilton McGee v. Felder Services, LLC, et al. |
Oxford, Mississippi personal injury lawyer presented the Plaintiff who sued the defendants for wrongful termination. |
Robert Skelton v. United States of America |
Atlanta, Georgia personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure of a federal government employee to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Kilee Peteson v. United States of America |
Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Cliams Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered $150,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a federal government employee failing to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Alphonso F. Brown v. United States of America |
Norfolk, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims act negligence theory. |
Leonard W. Houston v. United States of America |
Wilmington, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory. |
Ubalda Arzate v. United States of America |
San Francisco, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory. |
James King v. United States of America |
Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Appellant who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act theory. |
Gashaw Bekele v. United States of America |
Seattle, Washington personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries. |
Linda Fleming, et al. v. United States of America |
East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence |
Barbara Sue Daniels v. United States of America |
Atlanta, Georgia personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries. |
Luis Martinez, at al. v. United States of America |
New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theories.... More... $1 (12-21-2023 - NY) |
Lori Pearl v. United Stats of America |
Tucson, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a car wreck caused by a government employee. |
Fernando Balderrama and Maria Balderrama v. United States of America |
Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory. |
Mark Miller v. Brianna T. Sibble, et al. |
Scranton, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the negligence of the Defendants. |
Shawn Martinelli v. Paris Christensen, et al. |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a result of their negligence. |
Charles Love, et aux. v. Independent Cold Enterprise, LLC, et al. |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle. |
Gladis Alvarado Martinez v. AC Transport, Ltd. |
Seattle, Washington personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure of Akbal Singh failing to exercise due care in the operation of his semi-tractor trailer rig. |
Dana Ganard v. Doordash, Inc., et al. |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered less than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result on the negligence operation of a motor vehicle. |
David Lau, et al. v. ZTE Coporation, et al. |
Brooklyn, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on tort law theories. |
Wayne Brown v. City of Tulsa |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
Robert R. Salazar v. United States of America |
New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory. |
David J. Doyaga v. United States of America |
New York City, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a federal tort claims act auto negligence theory. |
Annie R. McGhee v. United States of America |
Tuscaloosa, Alabama personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.... More... $1 (12-13-2023 - AL) |
Edson M. Olivia and Grace N. Oliva v. City of Tulsa |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries. |
Next Page |