RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Bernard A. Orsi |
This is a breach of warranty action in the absence of a warranty. Plaintiff RSB |
In The Matter of Max Hopper, Decedent Dallas County Courthouse - Dallas, Texas |
Dallas, TX - Jury Awards Plaintiff Billions In Punitive Damages |
United States of America v. Richard Kent Harris United State District Courthouse - Houston, Texas |
Houston, TX - Montgomery County Couple Sentenced in Bankruptcy Fraud Conspiracy |
Mercury Inv. Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co. |
�1 The issue on certiorari is whether in a landlord's suit to terminate a shopping center lease for failure of consideration - based on the alleged breach of an implied covenant diligently to operate the business so as to trigger the percentage rental provisions - the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the tenant. We [706 P.2d 527] answer in the negative and vacate the Court of A $0 (05-07-1985 - OK) |
Wallace v. Smith |
¶0 1. CONTRACTS - When partial failure of performance ground for rescission of contract. A partial failure of performance is grounds for the rescission of a contract, when such failure defeats the object of the contract, or when it concerns a matter of such importance that the contract would not have been made if default in that particular had been expected or contemplated. |
Easterling v. Ferris |
¶1 On or about March 5, 1974, plaintiff below/Appellee, Audra Easterling (hereinafter designated "Grantor") and her now deceased husband, Walter Easterling, entered into an oral contract with Grantor's brother, Scott Spear Ferris, now also deceased, to convey approximately 4.85 acres in Johnston County in consideration of a note in the principal amount of $30,000.00 at an interest rate of 6% per a $0 (09-14-1982 - OK) |
Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Crop. |
¶1 The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Certified for this court's answer the following question posed pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S. 1991 §§ 1601 et seq.: |
Hart Industrial Supply Company v. Cleo Craig and Louis Yarmuk |
¶0 1. EVIDENCE -- Parol evidence rule -- Application. The rule which excludes parol evidence when offered to contradict or vary the terms, provisions, or legal effect of written instruments has no application to collateral undertakings or cases in which the written instrument was executed in part performance of an entire oral agreement. |
Hart Industrial Supply Company v. Craig |
¶0 1. EVIDENCE -- Parol evidence rule -- Application. The rule which excludes parol evidence when offered to contradict or vary the terms, provisions, or legal effect of written instruments has no application to collateral undertakings or cases in which the written instrument was executed in part performance of an entire oral agreement. |
Raymond Webster v. G.H. Webb and Ruth Webb |
¶0 In order to justify a reformation of a deed or contract the evidence must be full, clear, unequivocal and convincing as to mistake and its mutuality. Mere preponderance of the evidence is not enough. The proof must establish the facts to a moral certainty, and take the case out of the range of reasonable controversy. |
¶1 Harold and Barbara Uptegraft brought this action against Dome Petroleum Corporation and Atlas Oil, Inc., in the District Court of Oklahoma County. The petition alleged a single cause of action against each defendant. The cause of action against Atlas alleged plaintiffs were induced to give up their rights in two oil wells while uninformed of certain facts concerning established production they $0 (11-15-1988 - OK) |
David Hovannisian v. First American Title Insurance Company |
David and Linda Hovannisian purchased property from Wells Fargo Bank (Wells |
Daniel J. Ratajczak, Jr., et al. v. Beazley Solutions Limited and Land O'Lakes Inc v. Packerland Whey Products Inc et al. |
Between 2006 and 2012 |
Joseph Tomlinson v. Douglas Knight Construction, Inc. Utah Supreme Court of Utah - Salt Lake City, Utah |
¶ 1 Utah Code section 78B-4-513(1) provides that “an action for defective design or construction is limited to” an action for “breach of . . . contract, whether written or otherwise, including both express and implied warranties.” The statute also states that such a claim may be brought only by a person who is “in privity of contract with the original contractor” or by a person with a right to sue $0 (08-30-2017 - UT) |
G. T. Leach Builders, L. L. C-Residential, G. T. Leach Construction, L. P. and Gary T. Leach v. Sapphire Condominiums Association, Inc. |
Appellants G.T. Leach Builders, L.L.C.—Residential (G.T. Leach Builders), G.T. |
John Nelson v. Carlos Pasol and Jovita De Pasol |
Appellant John Nelson challenges the trial court’s judgment awarding title to and possession of certain South Padre Island real property to appellees Carlos Pasol and |
Caroline H. Martinez, Individually and Trustee of The Caroline H. Martinez Revocable Living Trust v. Robert Martinez |
This case involves a dispute between siblings, Appellant Caroline H. Martinez (“Caroline”) and Appellee Robert Martinez (“Bob”), over ownership of certain real property. After a bench trial, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of Bob. In five issues, Caroline appeals the trial court’s judgment. |
Howard Construction Company, Inc. v. Texas Association of Women's Clubs |
Appellant Howard Construction Company, Inc. sued appellee Texas Association |
Carol Paselk v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC |
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC (Bayview), purchased the property located at 330 County Road 1169, Brashear, Texas 75420 (the Property)1 at a public foreclosure sale. After acquiring a substitute trustee’s deed, Bayview sent a notice to Carol Paselk and all other occupants of the Property requesting that they vacate the premises. Because Paselk failed to timely vacate the premises, Bayview filed a sui $0 (08-10-2017 - TX) |
Lover Compton v. Lance Jue, D.D.S, and Lance Jue, D.D.S. d/b/a Beautifiul Smile at Lake Pointe |
Appellant, Lover Compton, challenges the trial court’s rendition of summary judgment in favor of appellees, Lance Jue, D.D.S. and Lance Jue, D.D.S. doing |
Levco Construction, Inc. v. Cleveland Construction, Inc., Whole Foods Market Rocky Mountain/Southwest, L.P. |
Levco Construction, Inc. (“Levco”) sued Cleveland Construction, Inc. (“CCI”) and Whole Foods Market Rocky Mountain/Southwest L.P. (“Whole Foods”) for claims arising out of its role as a subcontractor on a construction project to build a Whole Foods store in Houston, Texas (“the Project”). CCI and Whole Foods also asserted claims against each other and Levco. Following a bench trial, the trial cour $0 (08-10-2017 - TX) |
PGA West Residential Association, Inc. v. Hulven International, Inc. |
In its lawsuit against Hulven International, Inc. (Hulven) and various other |
Dow Roofing Systems, LLC v. Great Commission Baptist Church and Chamberlin Dallas, LLC f/k/a Chamberlin Dallas, Ltd. d/b/a Chamberlin Roofing and Waterproofing f/k/a Chamberlin Roofing & Waterproofing, Ltd. |
COURT OF APPEALS |
Dennis M. Rush v. White Corporation |
Spanish Peaks is a 3000-acre luxury resort in Big Sky Country, Montana, a |
The Estuary Owners Association v. Shell Oil Company |
In three cases consolidated in the trial court, the Estuary Owners Association |
Next Page |