Christopher Riegel and various entities affiliated with him––My Three Sons, Ltd., My
Three Sons Management, LLC, Prestonwood OB/GYN Associates, P.A., Christopher Riegel,
M.D., P.A.––appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their lawsuit against appellees for failing to
comply with an order compelling arbitration of the dispute. In five issues, appellants complain
the trial court erred

George Gregory appeals from a judgment rendered against him and in favor of Connecticut Shotgun Manufacturing Company, Inc. (CSM). He presents four issues on appeal. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Gregory is a competitive shotgun shooter. When the top and bottom ribs of his Winchester Model 21 became loose, he sent it to CSM for repairs. While CSM was working on the Model 21, Gregory contacted Lou

The heirs, devisees, and assigns of Robert Lindsay and June C. Harris1 (Appellants) filed a motion for rehearing. We grant the motion, withdraw our December 30, 2016 opinion and judgment, and substitute the following opinion and a corresponding judgment in their place.
This suit involved the construction of a 1906 instrument pertaining to the minerals under certain property and a 1908 release.

David Reyes and Sonia Valenzuela (“the Reyes Family”) thought they were buying a mobile home and a one-half acre lot from Annette Burris under an oral contract for deed. Burrus, on the other hand, contended the Reyes Family was only renting the property. After the Reyes Family had lived on the property for 17 years and had made numerous improvements to the property, Burrus sold the lot to a third

Appellant Nemoria Coria purchased a home from appellees Christopher Jide Ogidan and
Moses Gbolabo. She later sued appellees for breach of contract and DTPA violations. The trial
court entered a take-nothing judgment in favor of appellees. In four issues, appellant argues the
trial court erred by (1) entering a take nothing judgment when the undisputed evidence
established appellees

Rosanna Barrera, Jenesey Barrera, and Andrea Perez appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of Chererco, LLC, contending the trial court erred by: (1) concluding their claims relating to the title to certain real property were barred by limitations; (2) concluding they failed to raise a fact issue on their adverse possession claim; and (3) entering a final judgment in the absence of an intereste

Appellant Elness Swenson Graham Architects, Inc. (Elness) appeals from a final
judgment in favor of appellees RLJ II-C Austin Air, LP; RLJ II-C Austin Air Lessee, LP; and RLJ
Lodging Fund II Acquisitions, LLC (collectively, RLJ). RLJ also filed a cross-appeal against Elness.
Elness raises five issues on appeal, challenging RLJ’s right to bring suit for breach of contract, the
trial

Appellant Ty Howerton appeals from the trial court’s final judgment that confirmed an arbitration award entered in favor of appellees Dr. Michael N. Wood and Cindy Wood (the Woods). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2
I. BACKGROUND
This appeal arises from a home renovation that went horribly wrong. In
2010, the Woods bought a home in Mansfield, Te

This case involves a landlord-tenant dispute. In eight issues, Appellant
James Brand appeals the judgment rendered by the trial court in the suit brought
against him by his former tenant, Appellee Shaunte Degrate-Greer (Degrate-
Greer), for breach of contract and for violations of the property code. Because
we hold that Brand was legally entitled to withhold $129 of Degrate-Greer’s

Appellants Eugene and Mary McClain (the McClains) appeal the trial court’s orders granting appellee State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) judgment as a matter of law on the McClains’ claims that State Farm had a
1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2
duty to defend. Concluding that State Farm had no duty to defend the McClains
as a matter of law, we affirm the trial court’s summa

Benito Santibanez sued Alejandro Diron for Deceptive Trade Practices Act violations after a used vehicle Santibanez purchased “as is” from Diron encountered significant mechanical problems within days of the purchase. Diron filed a no-evidence and a traditional motion for summary judgment. Santibanez
2
filed a single response but did not include any summary-judgment evidence. The trial cou

KB Texas Investments, LLC, appellant, sued Roderick C. Spiller and Ann Marie McGill, appellees, to remove an encroaching fence, driveway, and concrete slab, formerly a garage, and to settle a boundary dispute between two lots in Harding Heights, Harris County, Texas. Following a jury verdict in favor of Roderick and
2
Ann Marie, the trial court signed a judgment, indicating appellees had a

In this case, we deal with the question of whether participation agreements in connection with a loan transaction transferred security interests in the underlying property or only a contractual right to the proceeds from the originating bank. For the reasons expressed below, we conclude that the participating agreements transferred security interests in the underlying property to the participating

Plaintiff Global Quest, LLC appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on all but one count of plaintiff’s amended complaint and to defendant Horizon Yachts, Inc. on its counterclaim for foreclosure of a promissory note. Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s entry of partial final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 We reve

¶1 We are asked to decide only one issue in this case: how and when does a party acquire title to property under the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence? Does title transfer by operation of law at the time the elements of boundary by acquiescence are met or by judicial decree at the time the trial court enters its order? This case arises out of a boundary dispute involving Wayne Hughes and Patric

¶ 1 Here, we consider whether Utah Code section 78B-2-206 bars a challenge to a tax title based on a tax sale effected without notice to an interested party. On May 25, 2000, Uintah County conducted a tax sale, yet failed to provide the record mineral interest owners notice of the sale. Now, over a decade later, the purchaser of the tax title and the individuals who were the record owners of the m

On July 16, 2014, the Defendant was indicted by the Robertson County Grand Jury for two counts of aggravated rape on alternative theories, two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping on alternative theories, one count of especially aggravated burglary, and one count of theft of property over the value of $1,000. The especially aggravated burglary charge was dismissed prior to trial on the Stat

In December 2013, the School Board issued an RFP seeking proposals from
vendors who could provide “Internet Provider Wide Area Network” services to its schools.
The new contract would replace the School Board’s existing contract (with AT&T) to
provide those services. The RFP required each proposer to provide sealed bids, which
would be ranked by a selection committee when ope

This matter comes before the court a second time. The facts and
circumstances giving rise to this litigation are set forth in our prior opinion and
need not be set forth in full herein. See N/S Corp. v. Car Wash Consultants, Inc.,
No. 11-0174, 2012 WL 1439084, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Apr. 25, 2012). In sum,
this litigation concerns a car wash manufactured by N/S Corporation and

Plaintiffs are contract customers of defendant or household members
of the homes defendant contracted with to provide service. Defendant,
Greater Ouachita Waterworks, Inc. (“Greater Ouachita”), provides water
service to plaintiffs at their homes and/or places of employment. On August
4, 2015, plaintiffs filed a petition for damages and an injunction related to
the water

Appellant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific) appeals from the
Faulkner County Circuit Court’s judgment and order filed on September 18, 2015, and
agreed final order filed on November 5, 2015, finding that the mineral rights in question
were owned in fee simple by separate appellees, individual members of the Tyus family
(collectively the Tyus family). On appeal, Un

Kirmuss operated an electronics business that specialized in radio-related products. In
2007, at a trade show in Hong Kong, he discovered a speaker microphone with a built-in global
positioning system (the GPS-Mic), manufactured by Wintectronics (Wintec). Kirmuss believed
the GPS-Mic could transform communications for first responders and military units, so he
arranged to mee

In this certified appeal, the plaintiff, WesternDermatologyConsultants,P.C.,claimsthatthe Appellate Court improperly reversed the judgment of the trial court, which found that the defendants, VitalWorks, Inc. (VitalWorks),1 and Cerner Physician Associates, Inc. (Cerner), had violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110aetseq.,2 bymakingmisrepresentationsi

This case arises from the unauthorized breaking into and entering of a Shelby County residence. For her role in these events, a Shelby County grand jury indicted the Defendant for theft of property valued over $250,000 and aggravated burglary. At a trial on these charges, the parties presented the following evidence: Jon Dickens, a MarxBensdorf Realtors agent, testified that he began his involv